• out of stock

[Afterpay] EVGA GeForce RTX 3080 12GB FTW3 ULTRA $1139 Delivered @ BPC eBay

580
AFPAYDAY

Cheaper than buying directly from BPC. Can also use discounted gift card from Shopback.

Original Coupon Deal

This is part of Afterpay Day sale for 2022

Related Stores

eBay Australia
eBay Australia
Marketplace
BPC Technology
BPC Technology

closed Comments

  • +9

    Get ready for HODL comments below.

    • +5

      Could be 200$ below retail and people still be like HODL for half price

        • +15

          They still HODL, because they're not stupid enough to pay double or higher for this card 12 months ago, the only disgruntled people are those who pay such a high price for it.

      • +3

        Well if you can wait for 1 year… Why not another?

        1000+AUD is still a cracked price if you remember the good old 1000 series.

        Everyone has been brainwashed with last year's prices.

        • +2

          Life's too short

    • +13

      Get ready to see non-LHR putting a comment as "Get ready for HODL comments below"

  • dupe

  • Would love a hefty discount on one of these at some point
    https://www.mwave.com.au/product/asus-geforce-rtx-3080-rog-s…

    • That card is hella pretty. Love the purple on it. I'd be keen on a deal too.

  • -1

    Still need to use after pay isn't it. Sucks.

    • +1

      You can buy it directly from BPC Tech's website for $1,199 website. It's $60 more than eBay but no afterpay required. That is of course, if you think the price is reasonable

    • +1

      Also, you can use afterpay, then just pay off the full thing and you'll save $60, I guess you pay 25% then the other 75% you can just do in one go.

  • I really want one of these cards but i've been fence sitting for around 6 months ….. I keep reading articles (and comments) about prices falling further "later this month" or "next month" - come on crystal ball, correctly predict the right time to buy! https://www.tomshardware.com/news/nvidia-to-further-drop-pri…

    • Same, have a build sitting in pccg wishlist waiting for prices to drop and specific items i want in stock, by the time that happens new hardware will be out.

    • It should drop to a good price for you in 2026, after all the RTX 6000s have been released.

  • I waited two months and paid 1259$ to get the 10gb ver.

  • $210 more can get you the ASUS GeForce RTX 3080 Ti TUF Gaming OC 12GB Video Card.

    • +9

      I wouldn't bother, the 12GB is close enough to TI.

    • -6

      Ti is better for mining when crypto boom 2.0 coming next year. worth the investment.

  • +2

    Toms hardware has the 3080 12gb ahead of the Ti.

    https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/gpu-hierarchy,4388.html

    I've seen a few tier lists with the 12gb model slightly ahead of the Ti model. Having said that HODL….still overpriced by $200-$300 each.

    • +4

      1845MHz 3080 vs a 1665MHz 3080 ti doesnt seem like a fair test

      • Didn't notice that, thanks for pointing it out.

      • The mhz speed is an entirely pointless metric to focus on here, it'd be like saying the 2500k is faster than an r5 5600 because it can hit a 'higher speed'. You'd only focus on that if you were looking at different cards in the same sku ie. comparing an evga 3080ti to an asus tuf 3080ti. Even then sites will just list their manufacturer's 'base spec' which is very inaccurate since the cards themselves will always boost higher than that. My card for example is listed at 1830mhz but will always boost to 2k+ without any overclocking.

        Hardwareunboxed also has the 3080 12gb within 1-2% of the 3080ti. There will always be a small variance between different reviewers since they run different benchmarks through different configurations.

        • -1

          Funny how you people always read into info that is never there. Go off the information they give you, not what you "think" is the case with no proof to back up anything regarding boost.

          GA102, 8960 shaders, 1845MHz, 12GB GDDR6X@19Gbps, 912GB/s, 400W
          GA102, 10240 shaders, 1665MHz, 12GB GDDR6X@19Gbps, 912GB/s, 350W

          • @Willy Beamish: Yeah… so lower clock on the ti but effectively 15% more instructions per clock. Am I reading that right?

          • +1

            @Willy Beamish: Benchmarks are literal real world data, what are you on about? Again, you have a very surface level understanding of how specs come into factor.

            • -2

              @JerraJones: Yet you still ignore the actual data in front of you for imaginary boost numbers that you think happened….. provide some numbers regarding anything they tested, I have, I'll wait.

              • +2

                @Willy Beamish: You are being delusional, the performance of the two cards is literally and factually proven to be within 2% of each other through real world use based off reputable reviewers. You're walking around in circles because you were proven wrong. Literally no one compares gpu performance based off clock speeds lol, are you new to pc hardware?

                • -1

                  @JerraJones: You still provide no numbers and your logic doesn't hold up, no wonder you resort to ad homs when you get called out.

                  Waiting for that data that you've yet to provide, I ask for data and you keep deflecting and projecting, keep malding kid.

                  No one uses clock speed, I guess it's the shaders doing the work in the number one spot then eh.

                  Navi 21, 5120 shaders, 2310MHz, 16GB GDDR6@18Gbps, 576GB/s, 335W

                  • +2

                    @Willy Beamish: The tomshardware article is literally linked to the comment you replied to stating performance numbers and the test methodology…

                    • -1

                      @JerraJones: Then why is it so hard for you to provide any numbers whatsoever, oh wait, because they never gave any regarding your imaginary boosts lol. Keep deflecting.

                      • +1

                        @Willy Beamish: https://i.imgur.com/gfDP1N6.png

                        https://i.imgur.com/rC7d4L4.png

                        It's also pointless to compare specs between amd and nvidia because they use entirely different architectures from each other. 1 shader unit from amd is not equivalent to 1 shader unit from nvidia, same with the amount of cores. Not only that, they are also on entirely different nodes…

                        Look, you don't know what you're talking about, I was similar when I first got into pc hardware. Bigger numbers on specs must always mean it's better right? The real answer is always more complex.

                        • -1

                          @JerraJones: You are doing a hell of a lot of work to avoid providing actual numbers like you actually know you're wrong but too scared to admit it.

                          • @Willy Beamish: Nah you're just trolling now or wilfully ignorant. Spreading misinformation isn't nice.

                            • -1

                              @JerraJones: Still deflecting instead of providing actual data, pretty sure you're the only one trolling here.

                              • @Willy Beamish: Flognuts linked data above, I linked data 2 comments ago. What more do you want?

                                • -1

                                  @JerraJones: You actually linked nothing relevant to the actual point, which is what people like you do when you're wrong. Still you haven't provided any info on these boosts you claim exist in their tests, where are these numbers? hmm? you gonna keep deflecting with the ad homs all day or are you gonna show your work?

                                  • @Willy Beamish: https://i.imgur.com/twd2gj7.png

                                    https://youtu.be/Vtkk-_0jrPU?t=448

                                    Wow, the 3080ti has a sustained clockspeed of ~1880 mhz. But it can't be, it says on the paper that 3080ti has a speed of 1665mhz!!!

                                    • -1

                                      @JerraJones: Waiting for the guy that claimed "The mhz speed is an entirely pointless metric to focus on here" when comparing the same gpu but different clock speeds to actually show something relevant…. hasn't happened in 7 posts following that idiotic claim.

                                      • @Willy Beamish: Almost like they aren't the same gpu? Are you being obtuse?

                                        • -1

                                          @JerraJones: Gonna let you actually think on that one for a bit, won't be surprised if you delete that comment shortly

                                          • +1

                                            @Willy Beamish: You do realise that the benchmarks show that the cards are very close together right? Literally nothing else matters. It's like comparing the speeds of two cars, one can reach 188kph, the other gets to 190kph. (Assume the power and acceleration is similar.) Your argument is similar to saying one is better because it uses a particular type of engine vs the other one.

                                            • -1

                                              @dealhunt3r: Maybe you should actually read the posts, they are the same actual GPU clocked differently.

                                              • @Willy Beamish: They aren't manually clocked differently by the reviewers. Those are just the clock speeds advertised by the manufacturer (Nvidia), in the real world they'll also automatically boost their clocks higher than that. All reviewers use stock settings unless stated otherwise, for example Hardwareunboxed and Gamersnexus both have it stated in their graphs if they have overclocked a gpu.

                                                • @JerraJones: No shit they aren't clocked that way by the reviewers… that's got to be one of the dumbest captain obvious statements you could make. They are using different cards which use the same GPU and they are both clocked differently, duh. Which is why I posted the clock speeds and GPU being used… I'm actually not sure if you're retarded or you just stated what everyone knew already and no one actually asked for….

      • +1

        By that metric, an overclocked 7GHz Celeron is better than a 5GHz i9-12900k.

  • Current thinking is you probably only want to pay tier down prices for current gen GPUs.

  • +2

    Serious question is $1139 a good price for a 12gb 3080 ?

    I don't plan on getting a 4000 series card anytime soon so I'm looking for a good price on a 3080 card

  • I might hold out for a good deal on the ASUS Strix 3080 12gb OC card

    • EVGA FTW3 is better than ASUS, this the best deal.

      • Yeah your probably right and I don't think the strix cards would drop this low. Also I'll hafto upgrade my 750w psu

  • +1

    $1139 hahahahahahahahahahahahahahah

  • +1

    Don’t hold if you’re looking for a sub 2.5slot GPU anytime in the future. Ive built a few Sub 10L cases and none of them fit anything aside from the 2 Slot reference or this 2.2 slot card. Lovelace are all going to be chonkers so you’re not going to fit them in your SFF case or run a 750W PSU with it.

    • +1

      I think HODL until ETH merge expected on mid Sep is the proper strategy. New gen is coming and AIB will try to clear their stock and miners will offload their GPUs. Perfect storm.

    • Do you mean that this EVGA FTW card fits SFF cases? I have an NZXT H210 and my current 1080 Strix is a tight fit.

  • They are out of stock, and afterpay has a $600 limit for new customers… so missed it.

Login or Join to leave a comment