• long running

[Android] Grindr XTRA/Unlimited - Monthly TRY₺109.99 (~A$9), Yearly TRY₺569.99 (~A$47), VPN To Turkey Required @ Grindr

2840

Well I expect this deal to be the greatest upvoted of the century but only time will tell! Ill let all the comments speak for themselves. But….if you have nothing better to do tonight. :D

Keep the trash talk out of here - after people cant honestly keep it out of here for a deal - I feel I need to show an edit at the lack of moderation going on here and possible discrepancies at other deals and this. Providing an explanation or understanding (at a minimum) as to why moderators are letting personal opinions of sex, religion etc into a deal is extremely poor on my observation. I have also sent a PM to the mods who have not responded.

Comments like:
BiG BoY on 20/08/2022 - 15:08 "Disgusting"
jonathonsunshine "all men are beasts that crave young flesh"
grasstown on 20/08/2022 - 13:43 " The lifestyle is not glamorous… It is just misery", "What does the lifestyle do for their self worth?"

This is extremely inappropriate and discriminatory and being left up on the boards attempts to justify people being ostracised for their sexual orientation.
Do better mods.

Similar to the other deals with a VPN required.

EDIT: A request for a description of the app: "The worlds largest social networking App for gay, bi, trans and queer people."
EDIT 2: I have put the main page as grindr.com this leads to a yellow face page and hopefully the flag which should then not be censored. Mods can review that.

Grindr 1month 3 months 12 months
Normal Price AUD$29.99 AUD$56.99 AUD$139.99
Discounted Price TRY₺109.99 / AUD$9 TRY₺234.99 / AUD$19 TRY₺569.99 / AUD$46

Step 1: Change your Google payment profile to Turkey. If needed, use a fake address simulator like this one (bestrandoms.com)

Step 2: VPN (fly) to Turkey and log into the Grindr app (I used the free Windscribe Chrome extension, or use a different VPN) if the currency is shown in Turkish Lira, you've hit the jackpot

Step 3: Subscribe to the plan of your choice. Use a credit/debit card (preferably with no international fees)

Step 4: Fly back home

Related Stores

Grindr
Grindr

Comments

  • +59

    Ghey

      • Which bit?

      • +24

        Suck it up, you're a big boy.

          • +6

            @BiG BoY: Too bad many of the organisations have been infiltrated by men that will have sex with young boys

            • @Caped Baldy: Also disgusting and should carry a fitting punishment

            • -5

              @Caped Baldy: all men are beasts that crave young flesh.

              • @jonathonsunshine:

                jonathonsunshine "all men are beasts that crave young flesh"
                This is extremely inappropriate and discriminatory

                Perhaps inappropriate but not discriminatory and you left out my emphasis on ALL men.

                It was a response to a comment about many organisations being infiltrated by men praying on young boys and I don't think that's a gay thing.

          • +9

            @BiG BoY: The only real disease is ignorance and close mindedness.

          • +9

            @BiG BoY: Australia voted 62% in favor of gay marriage.

            Could it be that those past religions and civilizations were backwards?

            • -6

              @happydude: Does this 62% of Australians in favour include the 60% who abstained from voting? Or was it just 62% of the ones who bothered voting? That might make the number smaller than you think. Last I heard Australia was a free country and people are free to have their own opinions. Just like you choose your own morals, other people get to decide what they believe is moral or not. Great, isn't it? That's how the world works. We all have our own thoughts and opinions and we tolerate each other and get along. Everyone is free to do their own flag waving and nobody should be forced to wave the flag for someone else's cause. It's Australia, the free country.

              • +2

                @Misplaced: Nope see my other comments. "Older" views are outdated and not as widely accepted anymore - re your view. People are people.

                • -1

                  @XCelR8: As mentioned before, you're perfectly free to choose your own lifestyle, or what you feel is morally acceptable. So are other people. It's not a popularity contest. Whether gay, simp or "overly conservative / old fashioned", we each have a right to our own views on morals. Our choice of values is personal to each one of us. What you see as "widely accepted" is relative to YOUR worldview and there might be some factors that contribute to how you personally see the world. Maybe your uncle Dave or whatever. But as far as I'm concerned, as long as it's kept to the over-18's you can do whatever you bleeding like.

                  • -2

                    @Misplaced: "What you see as "widely accepted" is relative to YOUR worldview…" Incorrect. Its not just my view.

                    • +1

                      @XCelR8: I can't believe the bigotry of you telling other people what morals to have and what to think.

                      • @Misplaced: "What you see as "widely accepted" is relative to YOUR worldview…" Incorrect. Its not just my view.

                        And…P.S I'm not even a subscriber… The fact that people like you are ignoring nearly every fact out there is beyond me.

                        Higher rates for EVERY LGTBI+ sector of mental illness, depression, suicide and yet you are still on your high horse about it being morally wrong….

                        Why are you even posting in this bargain? Let me guess, a vegan walks into a cafe…How does everyone know? Just stop and leave this bargain for people who are here for it.

                        • +1

                          @XCelR8: I never mentioned it being morally wrong. I simply said it is a moral issue that people are free to have their own opinions on. I don't have an issue with people making moral choices for themselves. What I do have an issue with is people trying to force their moral views on everyone else. Kind of like what you seem to be doing right now. Btw, what does "not a subscriber" mean in the context of this thread?

                      • @Misplaced: I'm with you. Absolutely hilarious this person can't see they are being a bigot by trying to force how they see the world on other people.

              • +5

                @Misplaced:

                own opinions

                I have no problem with opinions. If someone doesn't morally agree with homosexuality that is fine. They can express that.

                However, referring to homosexuality as a "disease" and that all civilizations/religions have rejected homosexuality is factually wrong. There can be a fine line between 'misinformation' and 'opinion' but the now deleted comments went over that line.

                There is more bullshit in your post as the turnout for the postal survey was 79%. How you think that 60% abstained is beyond me. The result was in line other surveys and reflected the views of the nation.

                Wave your morals flag loud and proud, go right ahead. That is your right. But making up facts to support your prejudiced conclusions will be challenged.

                • @happydude: I'm speaking ONLY for people's right to an opinion. Commonly attributed to Voltaire is the saying “I may disagree with you, but I defend to the death your right to say it.” A person who tries to force an extremely one-sided view onto other people is a bigot. People who try to force their personal moral choices on homosexuals are also a bigot. We don't need any invented words or phobias to describe them. I don't know why societal disaproval is such an issue for certain segments of society, if there's such a minority of dissenters causing all these suicides and what not, then that's pretty messed up. I personally choose to be civil and respectful to ALL people, and that includes people who are conservative / old fashioned. Does it make me a bad person if I choose to be a simp for everyone, not just noisy minorities? I don't demand that everyone else approve of whatever I do, and I don't understand why anyone else feels the need to demand this either. What I do expect is that people will extend the simple courtesy to others of having their own personal opinions.

                  Mod edit: Removed name-calling

                • -3

                  @happydude: Unfortunately you aren't correct either. The original post was actually the closest.

                  12,727,920 people voted.
                  7,817,247 voted yes.
                  Population of Australia in 2017 =
                  24,598,900.

                  So if you round the result up it is
                  32%.

                  Only 32% of Australians wanted gay marriage.

                  Let's actually take it further.
                  About 80% of Australians were 15 years old or over at the time. Let's include the number of people over 15, yet under 18 who couldn't vote.
                  19,679,120.
                  Remember 7,817,247 voted yes.
                  So the % of that rounded up is 40%.

                  I voted yes btw. Cause I just don't care what people do with their life and don't want to tell anyone what opinion or morals to have. (I also expect the same respect back.)But I'm just showing that the result was far from close.

                  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australian_Marriage_Law_Postal…

                  • +1

                    @NemesRhadamanth: So children and immigrants who aren't citizens were allowed to vote in the plebiscite? Is that what you're saying? I think you need to do a fact check on yourself, because your stats are totally incorrect.

              • +5

                @Misplaced: Close to 80% of eligible Australians made their views known in the Australian Marriage Law Postal Survey, so your claim that there's "60% who abstained" is clearly inaccurate.

                https://www.abs.gov.au/ausstats/[email protected]/mf/1800.0

                If you're going to make an argument, at least make it based on facts.

                • -5

                  @barcer: Unfortunately you aren't correct either. The original post was actually the closest.

                  12,727,920 people voted.
                  7,817,247 voted yes.
                  Population of Australia in 2017 =
                  24,598,900.

                  So if you round the result up it is
                  32%.

                  Only 32% of Australians wanted gay marriage.

                  Let's actually take it further.
                  About 80% of Australians were 15 years old or over at the time. Let's include the number of people over 15, yet under 18 who couldn't vote.
                  19,679,120.
                  Remember 7,817,247 voted yes.
                  So the % of that rounded up is 40%.

                  I voted yes btw. Cause I just don't care what people do with their life and don't want to tell anyone what opinion or morals to have. (I also expect the same respect back.)But I'm just showing that the result was far from close.

                  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Australian_Marriage_Law_Postal…

                  • +8

                    @NemesRhadamanth: That is an amazing shithouse assessment of how statistics work.

                    • +4

                      @happydude: I know, right? I read that twice and I'm dumber for it. Not sure how they got 32% from 7.8mil/12.7mil

                      • +8

                        @Caped Baldy: They are saying because newborns weren't consulted the postal survey was not a true reflection of the nation's views.

                        • +1

                          @happydude: Oh yup, I understand that but not how their mind is devoid of logic.

                          The poll also shows that 0% of Australians approve of voluntary assisted death. /s

                          Amazing that a five year old account only has three comments, all in this post.

                  • +4

                    @NemesRhadamanth: You might want to read my comment again, because you clearly haven't comprehended it.

                    Misplaced claimed that there were "60% [of Australians] who abstained from voting." The arguments was never about the total percentage of the population who voted a certain way, but you've twisted it to suit your own agenda.

                    You can't abstain if you're not eligible. Ergo, my earlier post remains correct; roughly 80% of eligible Australians completed the survey.

                    As for your claim that only 32% wanted "gay marriage" (words that were never used in the survey btw), you seem to know an awful lot about the views of people who abstained, or were not yet of legal age at the time of the survey. Where did you glean this information from? Particularly in the younger group, I'd be very surprised if they weren't very largely in favour of marriage equality.

              • +2

                @Misplaced: The turnout for the plebiscite was 79.52%. That means less than 21%, or one in five Australians eligible to vote, abstained. Not 60% like you claim.

              • @Misplaced: Are you so ignorant that numbers don't even matter to you and you just pull it out of your arse?

                There were only ~16.45 million eligible voters, that includes the 3% not enrolled, at 2017 election Your claim: 60% abstained?

                So you are saying less than 6.58 million voted, yet 7.817 million voted yes.

                118.6% voted yes, amazing.

          • +2

            @BiG BoY: I have reported this comment and your other one saying disgusting. The fact mods are leaving it whilst deleting other comments is a strong factor in my comment. https://www.ozbargain.com.au/comment/12567676/redir

            But…just to humour you: Lets start with if you believe in your religion and creationism, as straight people why did you "create this disease" ?????
            and then, more and more people in Australia identify as no religion than Christian - so you are becoming outdated. I can't even be bothered typing anymore. You are not worth the time. https://www.abs.gov.au/articles/religious-affiliation-austra…

            • +2

              @XCelR8:

              I have reported this comment and your other one saying disgusting. The fact mods are leaving it whilst deleting other comments is a strong factor in my comment. https://www.ozbargain.com.au/comment/12567676/redir

              Lol, then why did they delete the other comments? Should people not be able to think something is disgusting?

              • +1

                @ozhunter: No, because that would be making a value judgment, and that's "not allowed".

              • -2

                @ozhunter: Yes, you are disgusting

  • +98

    The irony of Grindr being purchased from Turkey is a good one.

    • +11

      Gobble gobble

      • In the pine forest?

      • -1
      • +4

        …something something Turkey Slap

        • +2

          Something something the Turkey challenges the Cock 🐓

    • Oi you need to call the country the new name "Türkiye" 🤣😂

      • Where's the joke here?

  • +38

    How does this compare to other streaming sites

    • +11

      Can you research for us and let us know?

    • It's a bit more fleshy???

    • +3

      Quite a few more dicks than usual

      • +6

        So like chatroullette

    • +8

      Streams straight to your back door!

      • Only if you specify watersports.

    • This shows more men going skiing.

    • +2

      A lot more swordfights

    • +2

      great if you're into golden showers…

      • Why do you say that?

  • +38

    Definitely a lot of coffee related deals recently.

    • I think the two people who already reported the post must have thought that too!

  • Protest deal/post on that church?

  • +4

    I thought the rule is that adult themed deals were prohibited…
    Surely this fits into that category?

    • +11

      I did check the rules before posting: https://www.ozbargain.com.au/wiki/help:banned_items
      And its not really 18+…but the mods can do as they please :) This is their site.

      • +3

        AGE RESTRICTIONS AND SAFETY.
        NO USE BY UNDERAGE PERSONS. The Grindr Services are intended ONLY for legal adults. NO PERSONS UNDER THE AGE OF EIGHTEEN (18) YEARS (OR TWENTY-ONE (21) YEARS IN PLACES WHERE EIGHTEEN (18) YEARS IS NOT THE AGE OF MAJORITY) SHOULD ATTEMPT, DIRECTLY OR INDIRECTLY, TO VIEW, DOWNLOAD, POSSESS, OR OTHERWISE USE THE GRINDR SERVICES.

        https://www.grindr.com/terms-of-service/

        • Should.

          • +1

            @Awoke: *Should attempt

            NO USE BY UNDERAGE PERSONS.

            YOU MUST BE A LEGAL ADULT. BY ACCEPTING THIS AGREEMENT, CREATING A USER ACCOUNT (AS DEFINED BELOW), AND ENTERING A DATE OF BIRTH FOR AGE VERIFICATION PURPOSES, YOU AFFIRMATIVELY REPRESENT AND WARRANT THAT:
            YOU ARE CURRENTLY EIGHTEEN (18) YEARS OF AGE OR OVER (OR TWENTY-ONE (21) YEARS IN PLACES WHERE EIGHTEEN (18) YEARS IS NOT THE AGE OF MAJORITY);

        • +9

          No different to an alcohol post

      • +4

        For future reference, all dating sites are likely to be for 18+, so don't set your kids up on them.

    • +6

      Well they're are condom deals posted….

      • +3

        Ummm, who wants to tell him?

        • +1

          Its … not ….

      • -1

        And?….

    • +31

      Like BWS, First Choice, Liquorland, Boozebud? All prohibited now? Most credit cards are only available to customers 18+, deals prohibited?

      • +3

        Are you saying that 'adult themed' is the same as 'only available to adults'?
        Because I don't think that's what it means.

        • Of course it's not the same, there's just a fairly big overlap. The fact that several comments in this sub-thread discussed whether the product is 18+ or not shows that this has some relevance in the given context.
          I leave it up to the readers to decide for themselves whether 'dating' or 'drinking' or 'taking out loans' requires more maturity. Neither in itself is offensive to me, although some people will always go over the top…

          • @team teri: But you suggested that the prohibition on 'adult themed' deals somehow was relevant to alcohol or credit card deals.
            So, in fact, you were suggesting that 'available only to adults' should also fall under the 'adult themed' exclusion.
            And even more concerning, 16 people seemed to agree with your specious argument that you now admit was entirely irrelevant. If we needed evidence that confirmation bias plays a part in Ozbargain comment votes - there it is.

            • @Almost Banned: 20 now. And don't jump from 'not the same' to 'irrelevant'.

              I still don't think that a dating app is by definition any more 'adult themed' than websites selling alcohol.

              In both cases it comes down to the implementation.

              To illustrate this idea, have a look at some of these ads.

              • @team teri: 21 now - and the point remains.
                You explicitly queried whether alcohol and credit card deals might be prohibited by the 'adult themed' exclusion. And then you admitted that adult themed and 'available only to adults' are not the same thing - meaning your original point was entirely specious.
                And yet stupid people keep upvoting.

                • +2

                  @Almost Banned: Your comment suggested that this deal should be banned for being 'adult themed'.

                  My point, that I tried to illustrate in a humorous way, was and still is, that not every deal that is only available to 18+ is 'adult themed'. Something you apparently agree with, since you think age restrictions on who can use a deal are not relevant.

                  How then does this deal end up in your 'adult themed' category when it clearly doesn't for many others? Do you put all dating apps in the same category? If so, why? If not, what makes this particular one different to others?

    • +2

      You'd be okay with a Tinder Gold sale.

  • +72

    Can finally have a one-on-one convo with JV 🥰🥰

  • +8

    Wheres SlavOz

    • +2

      He's already a paid subscriber?

  • +9

    Thanks op
    Bought 5

  • +43

    I was gonna say anyone going for this deal is a tightarse, but I don’t think that’s true

  • +7

    I thought this was for coffee drinkers and their love for manually ground coffee beans

  • Free delivery?

    • +17

      Only if you're a bottom lol

      • -2

        I think I saw someone matching your description on there in Bankstown when I went through earlier today 😉

  • What about Tinder/Bumble?

  • Sign up and get free meals everyday.

    • +7

      Protein shakes aren't really meal replacements.

    • At the bunnings sausage sizzle

Login or Join to leave a comment