• out of stock

Transcend MTE220S 2TB PCIe Gen 3 NVMe M.2 2280 SSD $208.02 Delivered @ Amazon UK via AU

530
This post contains affiliate links. OzBargain might earn commissions when you click through and make purchases. Please see this page for more information.

Bit of a sleeper drive similar to the Kioxia Exceria G2 with TLC, DRAM and ultra high 4400 TB endurance
Not widely reviewed, Amazon reviews are good along with benchmarks
Double sided PCB and runs hot so best used for desktops with a heatsink installed
Tier 1 usage

NVMe Tier Specs Recommended Usage
1 TLC + DRAM Main system drive for power users
1X TLC + DRAM + Gen 4 PS5 expansion drive (if heatsink not bundled, adding heatsink highly recommended)
2 TLC + no DRAM Main system drive for everyday users
3 QLC + DRAM Secondary storage, can be main system drive in very cheap build
4 QLC + no DRAM Secondary bulk storage only

TS2TMTE220S
Controller: SM2262EN
Memory: Unknown (Micron likely) TLC
DRAM Cache: DDR3
Sequential Read: 3,500 MB/s
Sequential Write: 2,900 MB/s
Random Read: 340,000 IOPS
Random Write: 360,000 IOPS
Endurance (TBW): 4400 TB
Warranty: 5 Years

Transcend specs page

Price History at C CamelCamelCamel.

Related Stores

Amazon AU
Amazon AU
Marketplace
Amazon UK Store
Amazon UK Store

closed Comments

  • Thoughts?

  • Anyone got one of these in the MacBook?

  • looks better than the p5 or nv2

    • P5 is high end Gen 3 NVMe (Tier 1)
      NV2 is a budget Gen 4 NVMe (Tier 2)

      Crucial is more reputable than Transcend so I’d rank the P5 above this

      • +1

        Sure if you can find a p5 at $200~ other than that, no deal.

        • Fair. Read your comment and thought you meant was better in quality/performance. This definitely wins in value

  • +5

    From AnandTech on the ssd controller:

    The SM2262EN's performance degrades severely when the drive is full, and this effect seems to be even stronger than for the SM2262 drives we've tested.

    If you want to skip all the cons, and want to make up tier levels on really basic parameters then….

    • It’s pretty big though ;)

    • +3

      I feel like you're overcorrecting too hard in the other direction. The quote continues:

      For a 2TB drive like our review sample, I'm not too worried about these performance hits: it's pretty hard in practice to fill a really large SLC cache, and this isn't the easiest drive to fill up to 100% with real data. Our toughest benchmarks are well beyond the range of normal usage patterns, so abysmal scores there don't necessarily mean the drive is bad or unsuitable for power users. (emphasis added; one line removed that is model-specific)

      • I also saw an youTube review which showed its performance when thermal throttled, it isn't pretty.

        Another youTube review played down the issue of its performance after SLC cache is depleted (claiming it has decent recovery time). I guess thanks to WD and Samsung both doing NAND swap to lower the cost for their mainstream gen 3 SSDs, when this SSD's SLC cache is depleted, it write performance is now competitive enough for gen 3 (assuming it is not thermal throttled).

        So far, all my 2TB NVMe SSDs are all PCIe gen 4 (decent ones - i.e. WD SN850X, Seagate Firecuda 530). It's just hard to get excited about this supposedly "tier 1" SSD, even though in a more up to date table from another site, my PCIe gen 4 SSDs are already being placed in tier 2, with PCIe gen 5 SSDs now being considered tier 1.

  • +2

    I need a motherboard with more m.2 slots.

    • Don’t we all!

    • Luckily add in cards exist.

      • Already have 1 of those :p.

    • Current gen motherboards have 4 or more nvme slots

      • +1

        Yeah but $800 for a mb ewwww

    • Both my Ryzen motherboards support PCIe Bifurcation. I have one of these to add 4 more m.2 slots.

      https://www.aliexpress.com/item/1005004638628231.html

      Note: I don't recommend that particular card because it arrives with a few screws unattached (basically lousy quality). Also, don't bother getting it if your motherboard doesn't support PCIe Bifurcation. My cheaper of the two boards is a B450 so it wasn't that expensive.

      • I can only use bifurcation if I run 8x with my GPU.

        • Then, you can only add 2 more m.2 SSDs.

  • +2

    Why does Amazon UK go hard on the storage deals?

  • +1

    I love the table. Certainly useful for explaining what it's suitable for. Did you create it?

    • +3

      He created that table. That's why PCIe gen 4 SSDs are mainly for PS5 expansion drive (I don't quite agree with that).

      LTT SSD tier list 2022 quick summary:

      Tier Info & Chipsets Description Usage
      S PCIe gen 5 (Phison E26) Ultra High Bragging, Ultra High End Server
      A PCIe gen 4 (Phison E18, InnoGrit IG5236, WD Proprietary, Samsung Elpis, Aries) Upper High Server, VMs, PS5, Pro Video Content Creation
      B PCIe gen 4 (Phison E16), PCIe gen 3 quality MLC (Samsung 970 Pro*) Lower High Low cost PS5, Secondary PCIe gen 4 SSD
      C PCIe gen 3 (Samsung Phoenix, WD Proprietary, Phison E12, SM2262EN etc…) Low cost PCIe gen 4 DRAMless (Phison E21, E19T) Upper Mid (PCIe gen 3) Balanced mainstream, (PCIe gen 4) Ultra low cost PS5, specialised low cost TLC SSDs
      D PCIe gen 3 DRAMless (SMI SM2262G, 2262, 2265, Phison E12S, Samsung Pablo (980), WD SN570)) Mid Cost effective mainstream, Some are suitable for laptops (lower power usage and good thermal)

      Note: * 970 Pro is not PCIe gen 4 (cannot be used for PS5). Also, too lazy to list tier E and lower.
      You can debate whether QLC with PCIe gen 4 + DRAM deserves to be in tier B. Technically, if you managed to run it within the SLC cache, it is still okay. Does get ugly once the SLC cache is exhausted.

      A QLC SSD can be used as a system SSD. It's all about knowing the SSD and use it properly. I have some junk class WD external SSDs which are DRAMless TLC. Write performance is worse than some DRAMless QLC SSDs.

      Use your SSDs any way you like. SSD tables are subject to change and don't mean much. It's more about knowing what you need and want (and knowing the strengths and weaknesses of the SSDs), rather than Crystal DiskMark results or finding some reviews raving the SSDs to numb your brain.

    • Yes, something simple that covers the basics

      The deal and the price are the most important, there's always more knowledgeable folks who will point out the intricacies in the comments

  • Just to show you guys how useless some CystalDiskMark tests can be:

    Kingston NV2 1TB - CrystalDiskMark 8 Zero Fill Test

    Read (MB/s) Write (MB/s) Mix (MB/s)
    SEQ1M Q8T1 7319.82 6604.37 8109.02
    SEQ1M Q1T1 5686.42 5482.85 5658.55

    All the other tests (zero fill) are also really high. Zero fill is pretty useless. Now, my SN850 1TB cannot beat that (in zero fill tests) so does that mean NV2 1TB is faster?

    Phison E16, E18 do cheat in all zero fill tests. E21 continues that trend. Newer controllers can have some additional optimisation to do well cheat in benchmark tests.

    NV2 is a subpar PCIe gen 4 SSD so it is more like a toy.

  • Back in stock for $205.39

Login or Join to leave a comment