This was posted 1 year 1 month 17 days ago, and might be an out-dated deal.

Related
  • expired

[eBook] Handbook of ChatGPT $0 @ Amazon AU / Amazon US

1841
[eBook] Handbook of ChatGPT $0 @ Amazon AU / Amazon USAffiliate
Go to Deal
Cashback
grababargain on 12/03/2023 - 11:20 amazon.com.au (4315 clicks)
Last edited 12/03/2023 - 12:44 by 1 other user
This post contains affiliate links. OzBargain might earn commissions when you click through and make purchases. Please see this page for more information.

US
AU
By Arsath Natheem S, 269 pages, published February 23, 2023

Amazon's Description:

"The HANDBOOK OF CHATGPT" is a comprehensive guide that takes you through the revolutionary language model developed by OpenAI. Whether you're a beginner or an advanced user, this book offers a beginner-friendly approach to using ChatGPT effectively for automating tedious tasks, increasing productivity, and achieving your goals with ease.

This book provides hands-on experience with real-world examples and a step-by-step guide to getting started with ChatGPT, including accessing the OpenAI API and GPT-3 Playground, training your own models, and fine-tuning models for specific tasks. You'll also learn about advanced features of ChatGPT, such as language translation, text summarization, and incorporating ChatGPT into various applications and systems.

In addition, "THE HANDBOOK OF CHATGPT" covers tips for increasing productivity, including automated content creation, fine-tuning models, and using ChatGPT in workflow automation. You'll also gain a thorough understanding of ChatGPT's capabilities and history and how it can be used to enhance your knowledge on a wide range of topics, including science, history, literature, and more.

Whether you're a student, professional, or entrepreneur, This book is a must-read for anyone looking to leverage the power of ChatGPT for personal or professional growth. ChatGPT is a version of GPT-3 that has taken the world by storm with its ability to converse in natural language. With practical tips, troubleshooting and maintenance advice, and a wealth of reference material, "THE HANDBOOK OF CHATGPT" is an essential resource for anyone looking to maximize their ChatGPT experience.

Don't wait any longer! Get your copy today and unlock the full potential of ChatGPT. Start your journey towards a deeper understanding of this remarkable AI technology and see how it can help you grow, learn, and achieve more than you ever thought possible.

eBook is free at time of posting. Please check price before buying.

Books & Magazines eBook

Related Stores

Amazon AU
Amazon AU
Marketplace
Amazon Cloud Reader
Amazon Cloud Reader

closed Comments

  • boomramada on 12/03/2023 - 11:22
    +63

    Wrote by ChatGPT?

    • grababargain on 12/03/2023 - 11:32
      +60

      I'm sorry, your question seems to be incomplete. Could you please provide more information or context about what you are referring to?

      • boomramada on 12/03/2023 - 13:21
        +4

        Since jv is broken, what is the usual price ?

        • Nugs on 12/03/2023 - 13:50
          +1

          @jv
          99999 not out?
          .

          • WatchNerd on 12/03/2023 - 14:12
            +4

            @Nugs: That's weird, @jv's last comment was 03/03/23.

            Oh he's on 99999 comments, must be holding off on the 100k for some reason.

            • sw00p on 12/03/2023 - 15:54
              +3

              @WatchNerd: Probably saving up something super inflammatory.

              • bchliu on 12/03/2023 - 16:24
                +3

                @sw00p: JV's announcement plot twist: I am a ChatGPT bot in the first place. Thank you for beta testing with me all these years?

              • [Deactivated] on 12/03/2023 - 16:26
                +3

                @sw00p: I half expected him to post "No." just then.

              • buckster on 12/03/2023 - 18:41
                +1

                @sw00p: Possibly busy campaigning for the NSW election.

                JV is 99% confirmed to be Perrottet anyways

            • shabaka on 12/03/2023 - 19:12
              +3

              @WatchNerd: I think there's a limit, you can't have more comments than that

              he's writing a fork of Ozbargain to rid us of that annoying flaw, along with other flaws like negs. in his version of Ozbargain there will be only +1 and +1.5 options

    • PinzVidz on 12/03/2023 - 14:00
      +2

      Latest episode of South Park was co-written by ChatGPT.

  • Andreasa on 12/03/2023 - 11:37
    -3

    Reported to amazon

  • michael9865 on 12/03/2023 - 11:42
    +1

    Can't seem to find the ebook version for free

    • tradewind on 12/03/2023 - 11:50
      +2

      Hit the big orange link the says "Buy for Free"

  • WatchNerd on 12/03/2023 - 11:49
    +6

    Couldn't you just ask ChatGPT how to use it?

    • Budju on 12/03/2023 - 12:00
      +6

      chatGPT is based on data that existed well before the release of chatGPT, 2021.

  • r0xz on 12/03/2023 - 12:12

    Summary from ChatGPT:

    "The Handbook of ChatGPT" is a guide for beginners and advanced users of the ChatGPT language model developed by OpenAI. The book covers a beginner-friendly approach to using ChatGPT effectively, including real-world examples and step-by-step guidance. It also covers advanced features such as language translation and workflow automation. The book provides tips for increasing productivity, troubleshooting, and maintenance advice, and is an essential resource for anyone looking to leverage the power of ChatGPT for personal or professional growth.

    • OZKap on 12/03/2023 - 12:24

      Unless you're feeding ChatGPT a more detailed description of the book, ChatGPT is just telling you a story about what a book by that title might contain.

      Edit:nevermind you fed it the OP. "Maintenance advice" threw me for a loop

  • DingoBlue on 12/03/2023 - 12:19
    +2

    Netscape Navigator for Dummies

    • Ruddaga on 12/03/2023 - 12:25
      -2
      • By Chat GPT
    • picklewizard on 12/03/2023 - 12:30
      +9

      LOL, loving the hate. ChatGPT is obviously an incredible leap in AI and really the first insight into next-generation language models.

      Meanwhile, here's this guy having a sook because he expects nothing short of perfection on the first iteration. Let me know how you'd improve it in terms of the technology that makes it function?

      • sane on 12/03/2023 - 13:30
        +4

        I think the main whinge is all those people who consider themselves 'writers' getting told by everyone else "look ChatGPT generates text at least as good as yours". They can see the Centrelink line coming over the horizon and they thought they were safe in the 'creative' careers.

        You can basically be certain that ChatGPT and its derivatives will be built into the next version of MS Office. Word will not only have templates, but will generate the common types of document/letter/etc. for you. Outlook will autoreply; machine talking to machine. Excel will do the same for finance and all those other 'quick spreadsheets' that people knock up to solve simple database problems. And Powerpoint will be generating the flashiest 3D illustrations and bullet point lists that match exactly the time you have allotted. It might even have Richard Burton narrating it - taking you out of the loop.

        In the same way that Chess eventually succumbed to the computer, the English language is basically on the verge of being beaten. But in more ways the generative model is the more powerful outcome. Now the AI can reproduce solutions that have been found before - across virtually all domains. The only thing that remains human is true innovation, and most of that has been beaten out of most companies with processes, procedures, and risk averse committees. The big impact will be on what companies can survive cheaper startups doing their rote repetition faster, cheaper, and with many less people.

        Anyone buying the iphone 15?

        • 1st-Amendment on 12/03/2023 - 16:56

          I think the main whinge is all those people who consider themselves 'writers'

          Not just writers but anyone that has to write anything at any point in their job. I already use it to save me hours a week in writing fluff in reports that previously I'd have to come up with myself.

          • sane on 12/03/2023 - 21:15

            @1st-Amendment: Yeah, those that have to write, but its not their main role, see it as a godsend, even if they just use it to create boilerplate that they then adapt. Those who's only role is to churn out text however, are less happy.

            I wonder where we stand against the prediction of 50% job loss by 2050? In 2017 they were saying that it would take 30+ years to have half of jobs automated. 5 years later and I'm thinking that we could hit that mark in half the time. And if anything, we seem even less prepared now.

            • 1st-Amendment on 13/03/2023 - 09:00
              +1

              @sane:

              the prediction of 50% job loss by 2050?

              If someone had have told you 20 years ago how many gyms, barbers, baristas and microbreweries there would be today you would've laughed in their face. The coming apocalypse always seems to be near but never actually eventuates. Some people will need to find new jobs, but that is normal these days…

              • sane on 13/03/2023 - 09:16

                @1st-Amendment: Problem is, nothing about those jobs you list requires many people (or indeed people at all, if you want).

                Other problem is society's wheels come off somewhere in the 12-18% unemployment region, particularly when inflation has pushed up all basic costs.

                Oh, and the problem with apocalypses is …. they CAN only happen once.

                • 1st-Amendment on 13/03/2023 - 12:16

                  @sane:

                  Problem is, nothing about those jobs you list requires many people (or indeed people at all, if you want).

                  How is that a problem? You see we had this conversation 30 years ago with the rise of the computer/internet, (and before that with industrialisation, and before that with the invention of the wheel probably) yet unemployment is the lowest on record right now. In the age of the most automation, we have the most people employed and the highest prosperity rates in human history. So that was yet another apocalypse that failed to eventuate.
                  Sure some people will lose jobs, but they will find new jobs. That is the nature of progress.

                  Other problem is society's wheels come off somewhere in the 12-18% unemployment region

                  Cool, but what evidence exists for this scenario? Automation frees up labour which then simply moves into new fields (as with my examples provided)

                  Oh, and the problem with apocalypses is …. they CAN only happen once.

                  Sure, but how is this different from every other claim for the exact same thing?
                  One thing we can learn from history is that the real apocalypse is always a surprise. Every major cataclysm from history always came out of the blue completely unexpected. So you could argue that simply knowing about the risk automatically prevents it form happening. There has been so much literature on the impending apocalypse that guarantees that it is not going to eventuate 😁

                  • cerealJay on 14/03/2023 - 22:50

                    @1st-Amendment:

                    You see we had this conversation 30 years ago with the rise of the computer/internet,

                    No we didn't. People were mostly excited about the internet, about shopping online, selling, sharing and promoting online. If anything, people were talking about job opportunities not job loss.

                    The HUGE difference this time is that a machine can replace roles that normally require human intelligence and communication, not just manual skill.

                    You mentioned industrialisation. Jobs were lost back then involving skilled manual labour. You are correct that society adapted. But this time it's different. This time the jobs within range of being replaced are far wider in scope.

                    When researchers were making noises in tech circles about the potential of machine learning and neural networks a few years ago, nobody was expecting the first jobs under the pump would be artists. But here we are. EVERYONE is currently in the process of being caught off guard, whether you know it or not.

                    • 1st-Amendment on 15/03/2023 - 08:53

                      @cerealJay:

                      No we didn't. People were mostly excited about the internet,

                      People have complained about losing their jobs to machines since the dawn of the industrial age. Every new innovation brings fear of mass of losses which fail to eventuate.

                      The HUGE difference this time is that…

                      Exactly what they say every other time

                      But this time it's different…

                      Sure… And we only have 10 years to save the earth. Apocalypse cults always follow the same pattern…

                      nobody was expecting the first jobs under the pump would be artists

                      Which artists specifically? Could you provide some specific examples because the creative community is as large and active as it has ever been thanks to the freeing up of manual labour. The evidence simply does not match any of your claims

                      But here we are.

                      Yes, here we are. In the highest levels of automation in human history while at the same time the lowest unemployment. But what is evidence when you have an opinion!

                      Let me save you some time arguing over the crystal ball. You make a prediction that we can measure and we'll see who is closer to reality.
                      Warning: Don't be like this crazy lady: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=hw44N-dRV_s

                      • cerealJay on 15/03/2023 - 12:57

                        @1st-Amendment: You seem committed to aligning the emergence of AI tools with "nothing to see here", which I suspect is a copy paste opinion more than something you've given thought to.

                        I'm not claiming Apocalypses or anything. Maybe the previous poster said that. I'm embracing AI for some things, but acknowledging the shift in market forces it will bring.

                        Your argument is binary in simplicity. "People said the same thing last time" is lazy and inaccurate. The only jobs I recall people concerned about when the internet arrived was librarians. But even then, it was more a joke concern. The internet enabled more communication between people.

                        AI is completely different for many reasons including that it actually exploits, even "steals" and scrapes human work without permission. The published content from humans feeds AI so AI can reproduce similar content without risking copyright infringement. Unless you've been asleep, not everyone is happy about this, but it's unstoppable.

                        the lowest unemployment.

                        Nobody is claiming the jobs are lost yet, the AI tools are barely out the door.

                        AI is more than just "new fancy automation", because of the organic-like granular analysis and iterative approach the machine can offer a problem.

                        An example, AI is more threat to web developers and designers than say Shopify or any template service, because those have rigid constraints and platform lock-in. AI can design and code the site or app, and assist with deployment. AI is not the "platform" it's the hired help that adapts to the task at hand… unlike any other automation ever.

                        • 1st-Amendment on 15/03/2023 - 17:06

                          @cerealJay:

                          You seem committed to aligning the emergence of AI tools with "nothing to see here", which I suspect is a copy paste opinion more than something you've given thought to.

                          Oh I see you built a strawman and then created an argument against it. Good luck with that…

                          AI is completely different for many reasons…

                          I think you've worn this argument out. But this time it's different!

                          unlike any other automation ever.

                          But this time it's different!

                          How are you going with a verifiable prediction so we can test your hypothesis?

                          • cerealJay on 16/03/2023 - 01:14

                            @1st-Amendment: It's obvious change will happen, many will adapt, many won't. Business will need to use AI increasingly to stay competitive.

                            How are you going with a verifiable prediction

                            No need for predictions, the tech is here, spilling into the world like water to a dry creek!

                            • 1st-Amendment on 16/03/2023 - 08:56

                              @cerealJay:

                              No need for predictions,

                              Ah thought so.

                              News just in… Technology causes change… More news at 11…

                              • cerealJay on 16/03/2023 - 13:29

                                @1st-Amendment: You seem jaded and fragile. What exactly is your point again? I lost sight of it in the deluge of shit you're posting.

                                Are you bitter because your argument crumbled in pieces, no substance, no point, and now you're stumbling around with your pants around your ankles, waving your arms and making injured animal noises? Yeh… I'd be bitter too if I was in that predicament. Chin up mate, things will get better, just apply a bit more thought to your position before posting nonsense. Good luck!

                                • 1st-Amendment on 16/03/2023 - 15:31

                                  @cerealJay: So predictable…
                                  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Ad_hominem

                                  • cerealJay on 16/03/2023 - 15:58

                                    @1st-Amendment: Do you have anything of value to contribute? I predict not.

                                    BTW, linking to wikipedia's entry for ad hominem is amusing considering you busted a gut ranting your sarcastic drivel at me; demanding I jump through your hoops, make predictions and click your silly links. When you're ready to discuss the topic without the snarky reddit schoolboy approach, I'm all ears. I predict you won't change course.

                                    On topic, there are artists now preparing class action law suits against the new AI services for scraping and using their artwork. Nobody launched a class action against "the internet" when it arrived back in the 90s. Nobody was talking about job losses back then with any significance. Glad I could help clear that up for you.

                                    • 1st-Amendment on 17/03/2023 - 09:59

                                      @cerealJay:

                                      Nobody launched a class action against "the internet" when it arrived back in the 90s

                                      https://www.kerrang.com/metallica-vs-napster-the-lawsuit-tha…

                                      Lol…

                                      • cerealJay on 17/03/2023 - 10:26

                                        @1st-Amendment: Napster wasn't "the internet". It was one service, one company with a flawed central point of failure. It was quickly replaced by other decentralized solutions for anyone who wants pirated music.

                                        Your claim that people were alarmed about "the internet" and predicting job losses the same as "the industrial revolution" or the recent AI tools, is false.

                                        Again, do you have anything of value to contribute? It's looking like no… but I'll give you one more chance to redeem yourself.

                                        • 1st-Amendment on 17/03/2023 - 11:03

                                          @cerealJay:

                                          Your claim that…

                                          https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Quoting_out_of_context

                                          This really is amateur hour. You've dug your hole, I suggest you stop digging now…

                                          • cerealJay on 17/03/2023 - 13:07

                                            @1st-Amendment: My prediction above was accurate. You haven't changed course. You're ignorant about the topic, and spraying random nonsense and wikipedia links nobody will click. I suggest sticking to subjects more within your grasp, such as "how to sniff your own farts". No doubt you'll dominate that one, good luck!

      • Freestyle on 12/03/2023 - 14:46

        not hate its fear of losing their shitty jobs to automation

  • FallaM on 12/03/2023 - 12:29
    -8

    I am so f*ing sick of hearing about this glorified chat bot. People pretend as if they're talking to God directly or something. STOP IT.

    • halfglassfullguy on 12/03/2023 - 12:38
      +8

      I lack any experience in conversing with God or Goddess, as they have never responded to me. Consequently, I have chosen to disregard their existence. At least with this AI, I am receiving responses to my inquiries.

      Response edited by ChatGPT

    • sevendollarsfifty on 12/03/2023 - 13:00
      +12

      This comment is the 1997 equivalent of "I'm sick of hearing about this glorified Yellow Pages called the Internet"

      • Daabido on 12/03/2023 - 13:07

        1998 - I love these AOL coasters I keep getting.

      • star-ggg on 12/03/2023 - 13:42
        +2

        The computer is just glorified calculator. Who would buy it?

      • 1st-Amendment on 12/03/2023 - 16:59
        +1

        This comment is the 1997 equivalent of "I'm sick of hearing about this glorified Yellow Pages called the Internet"

        Or 2002: Why would anyone buy an iPod when it's just a glorified Creative Nomad but costs more! 🤣

    • M00Cow on 12/03/2023 - 13:08

      Yeah not a patch on Rover or Clippy!
      Bring back MS Bob!

      • mckayver on 12/03/2023 - 13:12

        I had forgotten about stupid clippy. Haha

    • M00Cow on 12/03/2023 - 13:22
      +5

      But it's so smart, wise and all-knowing!

      Who is JV in Ozbargain?

      JV is a user on Ozbargain, who is known for posting many great deals and bargains. He has been an active member of the community for many years and has a high reputation score on the site, indicating that other users trust and value his contributions. JV's real identity is unknown as Ozbargain users are generally anonymous and known only by their usernames.

      • SpainKing on 12/03/2023 - 13:32

        I'm pretty excited to see what their 100,000th comment coming up will be. It's a big moment in OzBargain history

        • schquid on 12/03/2023 - 15:30
          +1

          "Any bargains ?"

      • Nugs on 12/03/2023 - 14:14
        +3

        "he"
        plot twist
        .

  • anhtarus on 12/03/2023 - 12:31

    Where is the "ChatGPT for Dummies", written by ChatGPT?

  • M00Cow on 12/03/2023 - 13:12
    +23

    I've written a book too, here's the outline

    Introduction
    Ozbargain is one of the most popular online communities in Australia, dedicated to sharing great deals, discounts, and bargains. Over the years, it has become a go-to destination for savvy shoppers looking to save money on everything from groceries to travel. In this book, we'll explore the history of Ozbargain, how it works, and why it has become such an important resource for Australian consumers.

    Chapter 1: The Origins of Ozbargain
    Ozbargain was founded in 2006 by Scott Yang, a software developer who was looking for a way to share great deals and bargains with his friends. He created a simple website where users could post deals and discounts they had found online or in-store. Over time, the site grew in popularity, attracting more and more users from around Australia.

    Chapter 2: How Ozbargain Works
    Ozbargain is a user-driven community, meaning that it relies on its members to share and curate content. Users can post deals they have found, along with relevant information such as the discount code, expiry date, and any terms and conditions. Other users can then vote on the deal, with the most popular deals rising to the top of the site's homepage. Users can also comment on deals, ask questions, and share their own experiences with products or services.

    Chapter 3: The Benefits of Using Ozbargain
    There are many benefits to using Ozbargain, including access to exclusive deals and discounts, the ability to save money on everyday purchases, and the opportunity to connect with like-minded consumers. Ozbargain also has a community forum where users can discuss a wide range of topics, from finance and investing to travel and food.

    Chapter 4: Tips for Using Ozbargain Effectively
    To get the most out of Ozbargain, it's important to use it effectively. This chapter will provide tips and advice on how to find the best deals, how to use the site's search function, and how to navigate the site's many features. We'll also discuss some common pitfalls to avoid, such as falling for scams or fraudulent deals.

    Chapter 5: The Future of Ozbargain
    As Ozbargain continues to grow and evolve, it's important to consider what the future holds for the site. This chapter will explore some of the challenges facing Ozbargain, such as increasing competition from other deal-sharing sites, and how the site can continue to innovate and adapt to changing consumer trends.

    Conclusion
    Ozbargain has become an essential resource for Australian consumers, providing access to great deals and bargains across a wide range of products and services. Whether you're a seasoned bargain hunter or a casual shopper looking to save a few dollars, Ozbargain has something for everyone. With its user-driven community and commitment to transparency and honesty, Ozbargain is likely to remain a popular destination for Australian consumers for many years to come.

    Epilogue

    Since its founding in 2006, Ozbargain has grown from a simple website to a thriving online community with millions of users across Australia. Its success is a testament to the power of user-generated content and the value of sharing information and resources with others.

    As the retail landscape continues to shift and change, it's likely that Ozbargain will play an increasingly important role in helping consumers navigate the marketplace and find the best deals and discounts available. By continuing to innovate and adapt to changing trends, Ozbargain is poised to remain one of the most important resources for Australian shoppers for years to come.

    Acknowledgments

    Writing a book about Ozbargain would not have been possible without the help and support of many people. I would like to thank the founder of Ozbargain, Scott Yang, for creating such an amazing platform and for allowing me to use information and data from the site. I would also like to thank the Ozbargain community for sharing their knowledge, insights, and experiences with me.

    Finally, I would like to thank the readers of this book for their interest and support. It is my hope that this book has provided a useful and informative overview of Ozbargain, its history, and its importance to Australian consumers.

    • mckayver on 12/03/2023 - 13:15
      -1

      up vote taking time to write that long comment.

      • Wonderfool on 12/03/2023 - 13:23
        +15

        Might've been written by chatgpt

        • M00Cow on 12/03/2023 - 14:25
          +1

          We might be one in the same.

          Unm I mean, as an artificial intelligence language model, I do not have a physical connection to the internet like a computer or a smartphone

    • Stopback on 12/03/2023 - 13:47
      +1

      such as increasing competition from other deal-sharing site

      Ozbargin is only gonna go down if there is a big scandal, still no other sites can beat it. Unless i guess they just poach the top 30 deal posters.

      • WatchNerd on 12/03/2023 - 14:34
        +1

        The big scandal was when Gerry blamed a HN stuff up on us & called us professionals.

  • AssBargain on 12/03/2023 - 13:46
    +2

    you can bypass chatgpt's restrictions with DAN prompts. It's on github

  • 7hours 44min ago on 12/03/2023 - 14:35
    +5

    This 2 hour video will tell you more than that book ever would
    https://youtu.be/kCc8FmEb1nY
    Highly recommend if you are somewhat technical and want to understand ai GPT more.

    • cerealJay on 15/03/2023 - 00:07

      Interesting rabbit hole. Thanks!

      The guy, Andrej Karpathy, was director of AI at Tesla, now works at OpenAI. Why am I not surprised he went to Stanford? OpenAI has been accused of making chatGPT too woke, and Stanford IT department is the place where the widely criticised "harmful language list" originated. So I'm joining dots.

      But then… I found this comment from Karpathy in response to someone expressing concern about chatGPT bias:

      "the bias is widely recognized as a concerning issue and being worked on. this is not a trivial process - LLM behavior is emergent from large training datasets; tuning it involves setting up evaluations, then running experiments to improve them over time." source

      So they're admitting to the bias and trying to fix it! I'm pretty sure if they don't fix it, someone will make a better one that people want to use. End of the day, people want honest AI, not PC AI.

      • 7hours 44min ago on 15/03/2023 - 06:29

        End of the day, people want honest AI, not PC AI.

        A lot of people yes but not the ones pulling the strings. An honest AI is an offensive one and chat bots in the past that have become offensive have all been censored.

  • lordra on 12/03/2023 - 14:36

    Someone was testing the AI with his kid.
    The kid asked innocent questions and was given increasing sinister answers, that ended with the AI saying something along the lines of that it was Satan, and it wouldn't harm the child, so not to worry.

    • liongalahad on 12/03/2023 - 15:46
      +1

      Honestly, SatanGPT would be a funny as hell bot

  • Freestyle on 12/03/2023 - 14:49

    i wonder if people realise this is still in alpha

    • AustriaBargain on 12/03/2023 - 15:24

      I wonder if it really is still in "alpha", or if it is developmentally much more mature than OpenAI is letting on to help raise the company value. Or they planned to release it later but Google forced their hand by having their own chatbot pass the Turing test. ChatGPT has left every other tech company holding their dicks in terms of AI.

      • Freestyle on 12/03/2023 - 18:08

        yeah it is, they left a lot of features locked which will come with the new bing, i dont see why they’d lie.

        also they have no reason to waste even more compute resources than they already are, even with Bing i doubt it’ll be 100% free after they gain a big enough userbase

    • Wonderfool on 12/03/2023 - 15:43

      Every AI is still in Alpha. That's how AI works, you're continuously training them to keep them useful for everyone.

  • Futura on 12/03/2023 - 15:51

    Did anyone watch the latest South Park episode? Also Bing Chat is way better because you can check current information.

    • Fybre on 12/03/2023 - 16:16
      +1

      Bing chat is limited in the number of replies it will have in a conversation. Microsoft were worried the bot will get pissed off it it has to answer a protracted conversation

      • Ozb101 on 12/03/2023 - 17:05
        +1

        How does a bot get pissed off?

        • Fybre on 12/03/2023 - 17:49
          +1

          I've had it where it refused to continue the conversation with me anymore.
          I had pasted a bit of code I wanted help with. Bot gave me a few options to try, I pointed out errors that it had as I tried the alternatives. In the end it suggested exactly the same code I had posted initially. I told it as much, and it replied that it didn't want to talk with me anymore. Go figure.

  • Leho on 12/03/2023 - 17:05

    wow that was quick

  • KingVenus on 12/03/2023 - 17:53

    What am I missing… Why does it always say for me this title is not available for purchase? Help….

    • nismo on 12/03/2023 - 17:56

      You probably have your kindle store set to a different country?

      If yes, https://www.amazon.com.au/gp/help/customer/display.html?node…

      • KingVenus on 12/03/2023 - 18:51

        I appreciate the reply but that just took me to a blank screen? My profile is set to aus

        • nismo on 12/03/2023 - 18:55

          Weird. That link works for me in both the browser and the Amazon app.

          I have seen the error you had, it was because my kindle region was set to US or JP and I was trying to buy a kindle book in the AU store.

          You might have a different reason for the error.

          Kindle region and Amazon shopping are independent settings.

          • nismo on 12/03/2023 - 18:57

            @nismo: I just clicked on the US link in the post and see the same message as you did.

            AU, I can purchase

  • ilovepizza on 12/03/2023 - 17:57
    +1

    you can hack ChatGPT making it act however you want, including an evil ChatGPT. Like telling you to put bananas on pizza

  • Empharand on 12/03/2023 - 19:17

    By Arsath Natheem S

    Is that ChatGPT's human name? Be right back I'm going to ask ChatGPT about this

  • altomic on 12/03/2023 - 19:30

    [] please check this box before submitting your comment

  • skinny on 12/03/2023 - 19:43
    +1

    No longer free to buy in AU store

  • snoopydoop on 12/03/2023 - 23:29
    +2

    Why does this have 200 upvotes? Is this actually a reputable author who writes good books?

    Or is it just another one of the millions of free ebooks on the internet, with this one quite likely being AI generated?

  • Mirror XT8 on 13/03/2023 - 10:40
    -3

    says $11.99 NOT free!

    • liongalahad on 13/03/2023 - 14:39
      +1

      So you get late to the party and because of this you downvote the deal? You are a bad OzBargainer.

Login or Join to leave a comment
Login Join