• expired

Crucial BX500 500GB 2.5" SATA SSD $39 + Delivery ($0 SYD/ADL/BNE C&C) @ PCByte

210

The best cheap boot drive, revive old laptops and servers

CT500BX500SSD1

Controller: Probably SMI
Memory: Probably Micron QLC
DRAM Cache: None
Sequential Read: 550 MB/s
Sequential Write: 500 MB/s
Random Read: N/A
Random Write: N/A
Endurance (TBW): 120 TB
Warranty: 3 Years

Related Stores

PCByte
PCByte

closed Comments

  • +3

    I’d highly recommend spending the extra for an MX500 if you’re going for a boot volume.

    If you’re using a last gen console any SSD will make a huge difference though, highly recommended for that purpose.

    • Size of games these days though 500gb wouldn't go far, probably would go minimum 1TB unless you mainly play 2 or 3 games a lot. But better than nothing!

    • Any recommendations on software to transfer a Windows boot drive to an SSD?

    • I’d highly recommend spending the extra for an MX500 if you’re going for a boot volume.

      I think the idea is you won't frequently need sustained read/writes for a boot drive.

  • I think this is better than Patriot P210 for same-ish price?

  • Crucial’s BX500 provides up to 540/500 MB/s of sequential read/write throughput, but that can drop to an average of just 100 MB/s during a sustained workload. https://www.tomshardware.com/reviews/crucial-bx500-ssd,5377.…

    For light workloads it is fine. I have been using it as boot drives on older computers.

  • Would this work on an old 2010 Asus laptop?

    • If it takes 2.5” Sata drives.

  • Can any victoria vendor offer the same price for c&c?

  • I bought 4 Silicon Power 512GB from MSY for $33 each and put them in a 1GB Array of AMD Raid 1+0 just for fun and to see how the technology is working these days.
    Read was predictable @ 1078MB/s but write was, understandably, a bit of a dog… I haven't had a chance to play too much with the caching options so it may get a bit faster. Problem is getting Linux to recognise the AMD controlled array as the support is lacking - probably because software raid seems to work better under Linux. But for $132 it was better value then buying 2x1TB in Raid 1 @ 1/2 the read speed.
    Redundancy isn't all that important these days with backup options, so I might end up setting all 4 in Raid 0 to get 2TB @ ~2GB/s read - theoretically.
    My boot drive is an NVME, this aray was just an experiment.

Login or Join to leave a comment