This was posted 11 months 17 days ago, and might be an out-dated deal.

Related
  • expired

Western Digital Red Pro 22TB 3.5" NAS Internal Hard Drive - WD221KFGX $608.18 Delivered @ Amazon US via AU

740
Western Digital Red Pro 22TB 3.5" NAS Internal Hard Drive - WD221KFGX $608.18 Delivered @ Amazon US via AUAffiliate
Go to Deal
Cashback
LPOLSKA on 11/05/2023 - 21:41 amazon.com.au (1116 clicks)
Last edited 11/05/2023 - 22:43 by 2 other users
This post contains affiliate links. OzBargain might earn commissions when you click through and make purchases. Please see this page for more information.

Pretty decent deal so I bought one maybe someone else would be interested: Specs posted to fill If you don't like it meh so what but thought I would post one deal.

Digital storage capacity 22 TB
Hard disk interface Serial ATA-600
Connectivity technology SATA
Brand Western Digital
Special feature Data recovery service
Hard disk form factor 3.5 Inches
Hard disk description Mechanical Hard Disk
Compatible devices NAS Server
Installation type Internal Hard Drive
Colour Red

Price History at C CamelCamelCamel.
Computing 22TB Computer Component Hard Drive Western Digital

Related Stores

Amazon AU
Amazon AU
Marketplace
Amazon Global Store
Amazon Global Store

closed Comments

  • stephendt on 11/05/2023 - 22:12
    +2

    $27.3 per TB. Not bad for a large drive.

    • muncan on 11/05/2023 - 22:23
      +4

      Hard disk form factor 3.5 Inches

      Doesn't sound that large to me?

      • stephendt on 11/05/2023 - 22:27
        +13

        3.5" is plenty. Besides, it's all about how you use it

        • BinChicken69 on 11/05/2023 - 22:32
          +6

          Its dense 😉

        • Skramit on 11/05/2023 - 22:32
          +4

          3.5” is about doubt the size of my drive

          • youknow on 12/05/2023 - 08:08
            +2

            @Skramit: Works better if you mount sideways.

        • abctoz on 11/05/2023 - 22:36
          +6

          is storing pron the correct usage asking for a friend

          • Munki on 12/05/2023 - 00:17
            +4

            @abctoz: You'll need more than just the one drive.

            • abctoz on 12/05/2023 - 07:12
              +2

              @Munki: I’ll just have to wait for the 69tb version then

      • Mondorock on 12/05/2023 - 00:12
        +5

        Anyone remember Quantum Bigfoot 5.25" drives? If we still had huge drives like that today maybe they could increase capacity?

      • jastreb on 12/05/2023 - 09:23
        -2

        Must be made in ASIA somewhere

    • Whisper Quiet on 12/05/2023 - 10:28

      It is a good price especially for the largest drive available right now.

  • MelBorn on 11/05/2023 - 22:45
    +16

    Paying ~$15/TB in that insane deal last month ruined all HDD deals for me :(

    • BarneyKB on 11/05/2023 - 23:23
      +2

      This one? https://www.ozbargain.com.au/node/769555

      • ShinK0 on 11/05/2023 - 23:51
        +6

        (profanity)! I missed out.

    • Palamedes on 12/05/2023 - 06:34

      Yes, I got the 16TB from that, running nicely in my NAS now.

      • harro112 on 12/05/2023 - 09:13

        i will never forgive myself for only buying one 16 and not two

    • justtoreply on 12/05/2023 - 08:42
      +1

      One of mine was DoA. Reckon I need to have both replaced to be safe?

    • wellzi on 12/05/2023 - 09:19

      Same. Nabbed 2 x 20TB for $630. I can't fathom the idea of paying $600+ for a single 22TB.

    • Konradical on 12/05/2023 - 10:26

      Completely agreed. So happy I nabbed 12x 20TB :)

      • wellzi on 12/05/2023 - 11:05

        Holy! You got 12 of them?! … I was contemplating up to 8, but certainly didn't have the $4K to drop on them.

        • Zorlin on 13/05/2023 - 13:54
          +1

          glances at 55x 16TB drives

      • Scrobo on 12/05/2023 - 17:01

        I only got 6 x 20TB, wish I had gotten 6 more.

    • ForbiddenCouponJutsu on 13/05/2023 - 10:58

      I saw that and was very tempted but I didn't have the capital to pay for it at the time (had just brought a Sonos ARC in the recent Good Guys sale) amazing price but couldn't add an extra $300+ to it

    • jaxon on 29/05/2023 - 22:33

      Looks like Seagate dropped prices (temporarily) to match the Ironwolf sales [Seagate Launches 22TB HDD, Listed for $18 (USD) Per TB]

      Edit: Seagate has announced it's created 5TB platters, so, with 10 of those inside a 3.5" drive, we'll be at 50TB shortly, and aim for 100TB by 2025.

      Is also looking ato 30TB HAMR drives soon this year too : https://blocksandfiles.com/2023/04/21/seagate-30tb-hamr/

  • ContinuousCustomer on 11/05/2023 - 23:05

    Still waiting for my two 8TBs to die.

  • pointless martyr on 11/05/2023 - 23:22

    i have a mix of 8 & 4TB's in my plex sever….never bit the bullet on anything bigger coz worried of failure - i mean a 1TB is just as likely as a 22TB to fail, given time?

    its getting insane how large these platters add up to now….what a time to be alive!

    • skrep on 11/05/2023 - 23:30

      === START OF INFORMATION SECTION ===
      Model Family: Western Digital Red
      Device Model: WDC WD20EFRX-68EUZN0

      Power_On_Hours 0x0032 004 004 000 Old_age Always -
      70694

      70694 is ~8 yrs

      I'm not even scared.

      • jackspratt on 12/05/2023 - 00:46
        +7

        Did your illiterate parents never explain about paragraphing?

        • pointless martyr on 12/05/2023 - 01:18
          +1

          yes - the wall of text is a highly detailed answer built with bricks of technobabble and computer speak that few of us really, truly understand.

          yes - indeed it is a highly detailed answer …to a question no one asked.

          and yes - i do find myself keen to hear more about his illiterate parents goatfarm though…

      • gunslinger on 12/05/2023 - 09:29

        That is a lot of text.
        Look at Tailscale for a (Free) VPN option, a lot better than site-to-site IMO.

      • johnno07 on 12/05/2023 - 09:47
        +6

        I suggest using ChatGPT to translate:

        I possess a QNAP device with five bays, each housing a 4TB NAS drive. These drives are set up in a RAID 5 configuration to store my media. The NAS is equipped with a 10-gigabit network card that connects to a managed switch (MikroTik) with a 10-gigabit capability. The switch, in turn, is linked to a server I personally assembled. The server boasts 18 cores, 36 threads, 64GB of RAM, and is outfitted with six 2TB SSDs. Operating on a hypervisor (Proxmox), the server runs several virtual machines, including Plex, True NAS, a VPN host, and an ad block/DNS filter. The Plex virtual machine has a folder mounted from the QNAP NAS, while the True NAS utilizes the six SSDs in a RAID 0 configuration.

        To facilitate high-speed file transfers, all three of my PCs are connected to the network via 10-gigabit connections, with PCIe Gen 4 NVMe drives. Consequently, I can copy files from my PCs to the True NAS's SSD RAID at a rate of 1 gigabyte per second. Admittedly, this setup is somewhat excessive, but I find it immensely enjoyable to experiment with.

        For VPN functionality, I employ WireGuard, and I have the WireGuard client installed on my phone, enabling me to access my Plex server via Telstra's 5G network. The latency is tolerable, although my next challenge involves establishing a site-to-site VPN connection with my parents' residence. This would allow me to remotely access their PC, back up my NAS to their NAS, and oversee their IP camera security system. The distance between us is approximately 1,000 km, and the thought of wasting my precious vacation time to resolve technical issues for my tech-illiterate parents is quite frustrating.

        • Joker042 on 12/05/2023 - 14:41
          +1

          Sure, but can it tell me why I'd care?

    • incipient on 12/05/2023 - 01:00

      But 2x22tb is going to have a lot less failures than 8x4tb.

      Also. Age is a factor.

      • pointless martyr on 12/05/2023 - 01:12

        yes but every time one 4/8tb dies its only a fraction of the cost to replace - or a fraction of the data lost….its a head scratcher, no doubt!

        • incipient on 12/05/2023 - 01:20
          +2

          The 2x22 would be a mirror. Absolutely wouldn't be running without redundancy!

          But yeah 22tb is expensive. The 12tbs are pretty decent.

  • Flakuciernie63 on 12/05/2023 - 14:53

    Polak?
    Pozdrawiam

    • POLSKA on 12/05/2023 - 19:44

      Dzięki

      • polstralian on 13/05/2023 - 18:11

        I ja się zatem dołączam do tych pozdrowień

  • Scrobo on 12/05/2023 - 16:54

    The 20TB is a little cheaper per TB at $542.43 https://www.amazon.com.au/Western-Digital-20TB-Internal-Driv…
    and the 18TB is cheaper per TB than the 20TB at $460.24 + $20 shipping, but both of these get an extra 5% off if you buy 2 which brings the price down more. You can get 2 of the 18TB and stay under the $1000 GST cap. The 16TB is cheaper too.

    • POLSKA on 12/05/2023 - 19:45

      for me its more capacity per port with low price per gb (the two together) at this price I'm satisfied in current climate

  • jaxon on 29/05/2023 - 22:30

    Anyone's orders coming in as a crazy long ETA? ORdered few days ago and the ETA is not for another 2 months.. are they making my HDD by hand

    • POLSKA on 29/05/2023 - 22:31

      got mine a week ago

Login or Join to leave a comment
Login Join