This was posted 11 months 17 days ago, and might be an out-dated deal.

Related
  • expired

Kingston A400 480GB 2.5" Internal SSD $29 + Delivery ($0 VIC, NSW, SA C&C/ in-Store) @ Centre Com

120

Surcharges: 1.2% Card & PayPal, 2% AmEx.

Specs:

Manufacturer Specifications
Form factor: 2.5"

Interface:
SATA Rev. 3.0 (6Gb/s) – with backwards compatibility to SATA Rev. 2.0 (3Gb/s)

Capacities: 480GB

Controller: 2Ch

NAND: TLC

Baseline Performance:
Data Transfer (ATTO):
480GB — up to 500MB/s Read and 450MB/s Write

Power Consumption:
0.195W Idle / 0.279W Avg / 0.642W (MAX) Read / 1.535W (MAX) Write

Storage temperature:
-40°C~85°C

Operating temperature:
0°C~70°C

Dimensions:
100.0mm x 69.9mm x 7.0mm

Weight: 41g

Vibration operating:
2.17G Peak (7–800Hz)

Vibration non-operating:
20G Peak (10–2000Hz)

Life expectancy: 1 million hours MTBF

Warranty/support:
Limited 3-year warranty with free technical support

Total Bytes Written (TBW):
480GB: 160TB

This is part of Click Frenzy deals for 2023

Related Stores

Centre Com
Centre Com

closed Comments

  • +1

    doesnt allow pickup from auburn for some reason

    has stock

  • email them

    • +1

      nah i worked it out

      they had one, which i bought

      now there's no stock

      tried to buy two

  • cheers bud! for the idea, bought another one :)

  • +1

    Thanks. Got one.

  • +1

    NAND: TLC

    Incorrect, it is QLC. I know it because I have one (and yes, from Centrecom, $29). I am going to tell you the issues I found so far:

    • This SSD comes with manufacturer pre-marked bad cell blocks. So, these have cells which are not 100% perfect.
    • The QLC folding write portion (basically, when SLC cache runs out, and you still keep on writing data) is horrible. It can go down to 30MB/s write.
    • If you insist on filling up this SSD in full in one go, it is much slower than an HDD.
    • The SSD health percentage drops quickly, after filling the SSD close to full and immediately format the SSD, CrystalDiskInfo drops its health from 100% to 99% due to the data write and cell health.

    Sure, you can use it for mostly reads (which is decent) and avoid writing last chucks of data (spread out the writes). However, just realise you get what you paid for.

    • @netsurfer

      If this is correct, I'd like the OP &/or Centrecom to reply here.

      I need at least a dozen reliable SSD's for laptop upgrades.

      Sick to death of the greedy scum lying their face off.

      • +1

        It's Kingston, on their cost effective range, they love swapping components. You will find reviews based on older batches.

        I doubt Centrecom will let me return it even if I showed them the flash utility report showing the NAND type is QLC. The worse part is that I bought one 2-3 months ago and didn't bother opening it. That one is also QLC (and just as rubbish as this newer one). Technically, this newer batch is tiny bit better. I really regret not trying the first one I bought before buying another one 2 weeks ago.

        • Thank you- pass.

          I was already shitted when reviews were posted with high marks and then they/others swapped controllers…sick of Kingston now.

          Are there ANY decent 2.5's around?

          • +1

            @Geekomatic: Maybe MX500, but there is a report that the 2TB and 4TB might be getting QLC treatment. One OZBer doesn't believe that and insists concrete proof must be provided before making such claim.

            Too many component swaps from SSD makers making it difficult to recommend SSDs.

Login or Join to leave a comment