This was posted 3 months 6 days ago, and might be an out-dated deal.

Related
  • expired

Galax GeForce RTX 4070 Ti EX Gamer 1-Click OC V2 12GB GDDR6X Graphics Card $1069 Delivered + Surcharge @ Centre Com

441
Galax GeForce RTX 4070 Ti EX Gamer 1-Click OC V2 12GB GDDR6X Graphics Card $1069 Delivered + Surcharge @ Centre Com
Go to Deal
RobBoss on 21/01/2024 - 22:26 centrecom.com.au (1855 clicks)
Last edited 22/01/2024 - 17:00 by 2 other users

Slightly cheaper now, anyone who paid the previous price of $1099 can request to cancel the order and re-order or don't it's up to you :)

I know what you guys are going to say, the 4070 Super is here and the 4070 Ti Super is around the corner.

But given that the 4070 Super is or was $1036.67 at its lowest AND 5 to 10% slower than the Ti, this price is a rather decent deal.

Sure, you can wait and hope that retailers are going to try their best to get rid of a discounted product, but for those who want something slightly better than 4070 Super, I don't see why not.

Here are some things to consider:

  1. @ $1099 it is around $725 USD which is similar to the price of the card in the US market (note that they have after-sales tax). It is now $1069

  2. The 12-game average according to Techspot between the 4070 Ti and 4070 Super is 112FPS and 105FPS respectively. Divide this by whatever price you find for each card, you can calculate the frame per cost

  3. Give it enough time, 4070 Supers are likely to move towards sub-$1000 which would make it a better-valued card. I highly doubt 4070s will ever reach its US MSRP of USD$599 or AUD$900 (maybe towards the end of the current gen cycle) as we will always have to pay for the Australian premium (GST, ACL, logistics, etc.)

  4. This is currently the cheapest 4070 Ti you can find atm in the Australian market. Feel free to prove me wrong.

Surcharges: 1.2% Card & PayPal, 2% AmEx. Free shipping excludes WA, NT & remote areas.

Computing Computer Component GALAX Nvidia Video Card

Related Stores

Centre Com
Centre Com

closed Comments

  • Jordan Stewart on 21/01/2024 - 22:32
    +37

    tempting, but as its 12GB its a pass

    • XeKayeM on 22/01/2024 - 07:31
      +1

      Aren't all 4070ti's 12GB? Why are people surprised by this?

      • Namidairo on 22/01/2024 - 07:58
        +14

        The 4070 Ti Super is out soon with 16GB vram.

        12GB feels almost decided by greed rather than a technical choice, driven by a company that's going around cleaning up and making a motza out of the demand for AI/ML, a vram heavy activity.

        That and it's too damn incremental for me coming from 8GB. :P

        • Commodore64 on 22/01/2024 - 08:02
          +1

          It feels that way… but I buy it anyway

          • bio on 22/01/2024 - 14:45

            @Commodore64: Why? Aren't you happy with your VIC-II?

        • XeKayeM on 22/01/2024 - 08:23
          +4

          I understand this, but people are talking about it like its a lower tiered 4070ti because its 12GB but they are all 12GB… there are no 16GB 4070ti's.
          Eg. @Hornpub below saying they should be 14GB??? then someone replying saying NVidia are taking the piss now???
          They haven't changed anything, its always been 12GB.

        • Iamdan on 22/01/2024 - 09:00
          +5

          The 4070 ti super is a 4K card.

          I think the meme about 12gb is overblown - if you are using it for 1440p or below the card will be too slow and outdated before 12gb ram becomes a problem.

          If you have a 4K monitor then 16gb+ is not required but probably a good idea. If you are only on 1080p or 1440p (and 1440p still looks crisp and incredible, with the benefit of higher FPS, and 1080p is still very popular for competitive games for the increased FPS) then the 4070 super (or the 4070 ti at a good price) are good buys.

          • Namidairo on 22/01/2024 - 09:12
            +1

            @Iamdan: I'd argue it's a blow for gamers that are AI hobbyists on the side, but there's also the 16GB 4060 Ti.

            It's mostly just negative sentiment towards nvidia because of the harsh pricing over the last few years.

            • Iamdan on 22/01/2024 - 11:37

              @Namidairo: Fair. I can’t comment on other gpu uses, I’m talking purely about gaming about 12gb being perfectly fine.

              If people wanna dunk on nvidia for prices they should, it just seems weird to get upset about vram when it’s really an appropriate amount of vram paired with that card.

              Unless you play on 4K, buying a 4070ti super is a big mistake if the main reason is the extra vram.

          • Micsmit on 22/01/2024 - 11:39
            -3

            @Iamdan: Alot of expert commentators(Radeon fan boys) forget that 90% of AAA will be designed from the ground up to work on consoles which has 16gb total memory ram/vram for the next 4 years at least.
            12gb with mild upscaling is perfectly usable for 1440p and 4k on alot of games.

            • Iamdan on 22/01/2024 - 11:40
              +1

              @Micsmit: 100%

            • Jordan Stewart on 22/01/2024 - 13:03
              +4

              @Micsmit: "90% of AAA will be designed from the ground up to work on consoles which has 16gb total memory ram/vram for the next 4 years at least."
              this is the true answer

          • freefall101 on 22/01/2024 - 16:10
            +2

            @Iamdan: I’ve been playing 4K games on a 10gb 3080 for a couple of years now, memory isn’t an issue at all right now.

            DDR6x makes it a little better too, the super will just be DDR6 (but a wider bus and more ram, so not really an issue). IMO the only real problem is nvidia makes their cards to expensive. The super models are where they should have been to begin with

        • Freddies on 29/01/2024 - 18:32

          4070Ti Super is "super overpriced" and have you checked its RRP in Australia?
          Will you pay $1500+ for the 4G VRAM and like 5%-10% performance increase at most

    • stevelo on 22/01/2024 - 19:23
      +1

      I agree, for $700 or below I can accept 12gb VRAM. $1000+ GPU I expect 16gb VRAM. There isn’t difference now, but who knows games in 2-3 years. In 2022, I was choosing between 3070 and 6800. I bought 6800 because it was slightly cheaper and faster without considering the VRAM, 8gb VRAM was fine.

    • RobBoss on 21/01/2024 - 22:49
      +5

      True, it is a second-tier brand but still owned by Palit.

      The thing with brands is that, the last time when I bought a GPU, they (not Galax btw) decided to stop making GPUs altogether which is sad after a couple of months. So as long as I get the 2-year ACL warranty, I don't mind that much. It is also not uncommon to hear bad experiences with brands like Asus or MSI.

      As for 12GB, can't argue with that

    • rainbowunicorn on 21/01/2024 - 22:50
      +25

      Why the hate on Galax? they've proven themselves worthy with so many Nvidia launches. Cards have to be to Nvidias spec as well.

    • KARMAAA on 22/01/2024 - 01:05
      +5

      You'd be surprised but the brand behind GALAX also makes Gainward, KFA and Palit cards, they're not that bad really. Sure they're not putting out premium stuff like ASUS is with the Strix lineup, but GALAX SG cards are basically equivalent to MSI Gaming X, ASUS TUF/DUAL, Gigabyte Gaming OC and ZOTAC AMP Extreme, they all meet NVIDIA's minimum spec anyway.

      • Pusheencat on 22/01/2024 - 01:29

        What makes a Strix more "premium"?

        • KARMAAA on 22/01/2024 - 02:00
          +6

          They use higher end parts or more quality parts. For example, the cold plate (the part contacting the GPU die) will be copper instead of aluminium. More heat pipes to aid faster heat transfer to the heatsinlk. They use more metal on the heatsink. They put higher quality fans on the product instead of ball bearing fans etc.

          • TsunamiInTheHouse on 22/01/2024 - 05:45
            +9

            @KARMAAA: You are paying for an advertising budget.
            Strix cards are ojectively the best.
            But they are not so good that justifies the premium pricetag when it rivals the next tier product.

            Aka, would you buy a 4070 strix or a 4070ti windforce

            Theres only one non-batshit insane answer

          • slam on 22/01/2024 - 11:12

            @KARMAAA: Its not only that, but the VRMs and power phases of the cards as well as the quality of the capacitors.

          • cille745 on 22/01/2024 - 12:59
            +4

            @KARMAAA: For the average consumer though, these mean nothing.

            They will play the same games, at the same frame rates, for a similar lifespan anyway. Asus ROG fans aren’t higher tier either, you’re just paying for aesthetics

      • MagnamoniousRex on 24/01/2024 - 20:02

        I never understood not just buying the cheapest card unless it was EVGA whose cards were actually premium quality for your money.

        Anyone else just but the cheapest card, the performance benefit of a more expensive card is never more than a few percent.

  • Hornpub on 21/01/2024 - 23:20
    +8

    12g a solid pass.
    Reasonable for xx60 but not 70 the main stream med budget level . At least 14 show some respect for us

    • bobalot on 22/01/2024 - 07:58
      +4

      Nvidia are really taking the piss now.

      • GandalfTheCheap on 22/01/2024 - 08:54
        +7

        Now?

        They weren't really taking the piss charging 3k for a video card, or making a card that wasn't faster than it's last-gen counterpart, or charging scalper prices on their whole range, or deceptive naming (planned 4070 renamed "4080" and so on down their whole lineup), or still not reducing prices on cards over a year old?

  • AppVisionAus on 21/01/2024 - 23:27
    +2

    Wow, finally saw the 4070ti below $1100.
    The 4070Ti Super will be unlocked next week.
    Will see what happen then.

    • RobBoss on 21/01/2024 - 23:38
      +6

      4070Ti Super MSRP is $1499 so I don't think it will affect the price of 4070Ti too much at least not at the start. I anticipate 4070 Ti's to go as low as $999 or maybe even $949 at some point. Anything lower than that would not make much sense since 4070 will still be sold.

      • Mondorock on 21/01/2024 - 23:47
        +2

        Hmm, how does a US$799 MSRP equate to an Australian MSRP of $1499??

        • nelladream on 21/01/2024 - 23:50
          +13

          Welcome to Australia - a place where u need to pay premium for everything

        • RobBoss on 21/01/2024 - 23:56
          +3

          Because our AUD value sucks atm, businesses will often use a rate that is far worse than market rate as well

        • TsunamiInTheHouse on 22/01/2024 - 05:42
          -6

          Australia isnt filled with impoverished exploited citizens with zero purchasing power. See…we only exploit immigants.

          $800 usd = $1250 aud

          $1250 x 1.10 = $1375

          If your with a $1000+ object is a grievance of an $125 'australian tax' for an item that should last 2 years, aka 750 odd days, aka 16c a day

          Reevaluate your life decisions.

          • Iamdan on 22/01/2024 - 09:05
            +2

            @TsunamiInTheHouse: 2 years? Man I’m still using my 2060 which I’ve had probably nearly 5 years.

        • jonneh on 23/01/2024 - 09:15

          Some of the descrepancy is because advertised prices don't include taxes in the US

      • reader64 on 22/01/2024 - 00:40
        +2

        it's not that it impact's the price

        It's an EOL product

        so if it sits on shelves for a while,it will get knocked down to clear,they will mark it down as a loss.

  • TsundereGuy on 21/01/2024 - 23:38
    -2

    Not a good deal. The 4070 Super replaces the MSRP of the 4070, the best 4070 deals have averaged $869 or so for quite some time. Given that the 4070 Ti is a sub 10% lead over the Super, $939 should be a reasonable deal and no more than $999 on a bad day.

    • RobBoss on 21/01/2024 - 23:46
      +10

      Mate, as I have mentioned, 4070 Supers are likely to reach sub-$1000 at some point and this deal is for someone who is buying 4070 Supers now. Like cannot wait any longer.

      Also if you compare the MSRP of 4070 Super which is $1199 with the stabilised price of a 4070 which is around $869-$889, then you will find that 4070 has definitely not replaced the MSRP of 4070s yet

      Also, MSRP of 4070s was $1109 last year and MSRP of 4070 Supers is $1199. Thank inflation, weak AUD, or whatever for that.

      • TsundereGuy on 22/01/2024 - 00:37
        -2

        No fair enough, I didn't read your description. I know some people can't wait, I'd just find it odd myself given just how transitory this period is right now.

        However I did check the Australian MSRP again on Nvidia's website to verify it is indeed around the mark of the base 4070 at $1119. Strangely enough inflation hasn't played a role in this sector recently which surprised me.

        • [Deactivated] on 22/01/2024 - 00:42
          +1

          The 4070S are struggling to sell, this means that if this continues, nVidia may do a few diff things.
          Further reduce pricing of the 4070Ti to make way for the 4070Ti S. Keep pricing as it is to make the EOL products shift, or just stick with what they're doing which is RRP.

        • TsundereGuy on 22/01/2024 - 14:23
          +1

          Any of you want to clarify what I said wrong? This is one of the most bizarre cases of downvoting I've ever seen. I said nothing that hasn't been said by other people before me in other threads, in a similar vein and yet somehow I've come off as problematic?

          I've seen people genuinely come off as obnoxious before and they're not given downvotes. Particularly what I could've said wrong in the second comment I can't hazard a guess at all. Really does wonders for one's paranoia, thanks.

          • xyron on 24/01/2024 - 10:27
            +1

            @TsundereGuy: You're getting negged because you admitted to writing your original post without even bothering to read the OP's description.

            • TsundereGuy on 24/01/2024 - 16:33
              +1

              @xyron: And I apologize for that. It was a simple oversight, nothing more. I just have little time for forum culture where every slight is seemingly treated as a cardinal sin. Now I can't say confidently that's what is going on, though it feels like it sometimes. I acknowledge I was wrong within the context of the deal. I'll be more diligent in the future.

    • Gamer Dad Reviews on 21/01/2024 - 23:49

      I got to agree - there’s some real doomers on this site who seem to be taking Nvidia’s ridiculous Aussie MSRPs on the Super cards seriously.

      Bro - you’ll be able to get a 4070 Ti Super for <$1200 easy soon enough, and it will spank this non-Super Ti

      • [Deactivated] on 21/01/2024 - 23:59
        +4

        Bro - you’ll be able to get a 4070 Ti Super for <$1200 easy soon enough, and it will spank this non-Super Ti

        Few hours ago it was $1300, how much bs do you actually make up?

        You getting this from Japan too?

    • [Deactivated] on 22/01/2024 - 00:01
      -2

      I agree with you 100%, everything you've said it spot on.
      Do you know how much we are paying more for when other companies that are world wide (I am into synths) give us parity, and we are either paying the same or less than US or UK?

  • Edyolo on 22/01/2024 - 01:01
    +11

    Centrecom rats… I had a broken keyboard I bought on a sale (quality issue), they offered to replace it with the brand new one if I pay the difference of current non-discounted price minus the discounted price I paid?

    For the exact same model WTF?

    Centrecom never fail to amaze. Also they don’t refund surcharge if you purchase with a credit card if you return the item unopened.

    • Lonewolf1983 on 22/01/2024 - 01:17
      +11

      you have rights to a replacement or refund, whichever you prefer - hit them with the ACL if you have to

    • jonneh on 23/01/2024 - 09:19

      I don't go go near CentreCom or recommend them to family/friends.
      The fan on my GPU started rattling within the warranty period on the box and they straight up ignored my support ticket.
      After that found out that they have a reputation for not honouring warranties or the Australian Consumer Laws.

  • abctoz on 22/01/2024 - 06:59

    on this website comparison is not allowed sorry, it’s only a deal if it is x% off

  • Flying Ace on 22/01/2024 - 07:42

    Wow, so glad I didn't hold - I bought my 4070Ti for this price months ago, I'm glad they haven't dropped further.

  • botchie on 22/01/2024 - 08:17
    +5

    have to love cashvidia and its followers that give their money to them so easily.
    re release a product a year later - slap extra price tag on it and watch monkeys buy it all up
    they could/should have released 4070ti super in its current form last year but no, they are cashvidia and ppl wont mind and will defend them anyway.

    I would rather buy a sub performing AMD card any day then give in to these crocks

    • John Doh on 22/01/2024 - 10:05
      +3

      Even AMD has become CashMD if you havent looked at the price/features/performance comparision. BTW i did not neg you as I consider both companies to have become greedy.

      • botchie on 22/01/2024 - 10:27
        +2

        yes true but AMD released a card with 24gb with similar performance to Nvidia, they also gave ppl freesync when Nvidia had g sync that cost $200, they don't re release cards half way and charge more, they gave FSR which you can use on an Nvidia card instead of DLSS which is locked and locked on new cards only.
        everything Nvidia does sucks and its anti consumer

        • John Doh on 22/01/2024 - 10:36
          +2

          Absolutely agree with you on all that. But, at the end of the day, nvidia gives slightly better drivers, DLSS thats usable and almost on par with default rendering, cuda cores, better overall RT performance, Frame gen etc. I mean if you switch on RT and DLSS, you get better visual quality than XTX on a last gen 3080Ti (Not including Framegen). So they charge a premium. Its upto the user to decide what they want at the end. Yes 12GB sucks. So get the Ti Super or a 4080. Or leave all the features and get an XT.

          https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Not1qro4dHg&ab_channel=Terra…

          • botchie on 22/01/2024 - 10:42
            +2

            @John Doh: yes Nvidia has better higher end cards - but in the mid range and possibly lower end you get a better deal on AMD
            most used card is a 3060 - you can get a better AMD card for less $$

            in the end - as you say consumer decides , and consumer likes to be dic$ed about

            • John Doh on 22/01/2024 - 11:00

              @botchie: I gave up on both and got an used last gen high end nvidia card with warranty remaining.

              • botchie on 22/01/2024 - 11:57

                @John Doh: yeah, there is talk of Intel getting out something but their last offering was well below garbage level

                • John Doh on 22/01/2024 - 12:12

                  @botchie: For a first gen card (ignoring previous igpu releases), I wouldnt call it garbage though. 3060/Ti level performance with good amount of VRAM and less hit on FPS with RT on compared to AMD and ever improving drivers, its not a small feat to just enter 20 years late compared to competition and be as good as they got today considering intel is losing sales on all fronts including server CPUs. Hopefully battlemage would make it better, but it would still be a mid end card when nvidia 5xxx comes out . But then rumours also say that there wont be a high en AMD card next gen as they are concentrating on getting the MCM GPUs working.

                  • botchie on 22/01/2024 - 12:44

                    @John Doh: Yeah, Nvidia will be hard to move from their throne for a while yet , unfortunately

  • solidussnake on 22/01/2024 - 10:36

    I got a 4070ti MSI for $1100 new last year from the eBay CA deal also sold the Diablo code for $60 bringing it to $1040 crazy they haven't moved much

    • botchie on 22/01/2024 - 10:44
      +3

      last year USD to AUD was 1.4, its now 1.52 , even thought AUD fell you can get the card cheaper now, so it has moved a bit in reality

  • Budju on 22/01/2024 - 10:47
    +2

    12gb

  • choory on 22/01/2024 - 10:48
    +1

    Yeah~ keep going down!
    I'm waiting RTX 4070 Ti Super.

  • Phreebee on 22/01/2024 - 11:43
    -5

    12GB is enough for most if not all games for some time to come. Devs won't be requiring 16GB VRAM as it's not in their commercial interest to do so given only a very small percentage of their target market of PC gamers have video cards with more than 12GB VRAM. In fact most PC gamers still have cards with only 8GB (or less) VRAM according to the latest Steam Hardware Survey. However 8GB is now becoming a limiting factor as they need to play at medium or low graphics settings to play many of the latest graphically demanding games. 8GB cards have been around since 2017 and still for sale in the latest generation of cards today, disappointingly. 12GB should be regarded as the new minimum standard. Games like Hogwarts Legacy, The Last Of Us Part 1 and Star Wars Jedi Survivor all use most of the available 12GB VRAM. Allocated vs used VRAM argument always comes up, but when games stutter like crazy or constantly remove then redraw the textures during gameplay (which can happen when using cards with less than 12GB VRAM) that's the sign they've really run out of VRAM for that game and it's time to get a better card or lower your graphical settings.

    • Austrian Oak on 22/01/2024 - 13:06

      Flight sim and VR users enter chat.

      • povogamer on 22/01/2024 - 13:24
        +3

        … and a small niche does not represent the wider population

        • Austrian Oak on 22/01/2024 - 13:30
          -1

          A Top 100 selling game with 10 million users a small niche. Aha.
          Also people spending $1000+ on a graphics card is not indicative of the wider population either. So what's your point?

          • povogamer on 22/01/2024 - 13:50
            +3

            @Austrian Oak:

            A Top 100 selling game with 10 million users a small niche. Aha.

            lmao
            mfers who got gamepass and opened the menu is a "user" of the game apparently, right?

          • povogamer on 22/01/2024 - 13:52
            +1

            @Austrian Oak:

            Also people spending $1000+ on a graphics card is not indicative of the wider population either. So what's your point?

            Except that is the population we are talking about. PC builders who either spend >$1k on a GPU or wishes they could do so.

            • Austrian Oak on 22/01/2024 - 14:06
              -4

              @povogamer: You initially referred to the group buying $1000+ GPUs as a small niche. Later, you stated that this is the population under discussion – PC builders spending more than $1k on a GPU or wishing they could. This seems contradictory. Can you clarify whether you believe high-spending PC builders are indicative of the wider population or not?

              • povogamer on 22/01/2024 - 17:33
                +1

                @Austrian Oak:

                You initially referred to the group buying $1000+ GPUs as a small niche

                No I did not, and you understood as such when you said "A Top 100 selling game with 10 million users a small niche. Aha." Why twist words at this point?

  • micsway on 22/01/2024 - 20:04

    Better yet the 4080 is 1559 from them.

    • 0x20 on 23/01/2024 - 13:00
      +1

      45% more cost for 17-20% more performance? Depends on your needs maybe

  • Edyolo on 24/01/2024 - 02:19
    +4

    4070 ti super is a joke. 3% faster in 1440p: https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=ePbKc6THvCM

    • xyron on 24/01/2024 - 10:29
      +1

      10% faster in 4K than 4070 Ti…not a joke to 4K players.

      I agree though if playing at 1440p may as well save your dollars and go for regular Ti. I'm torn as I game at 4K (Currently on 6900 XT, dont really need to upgrade as it is, and not stoked about losing VRAM if going for the regular Ti).

      • Edyolo on 24/01/2024 - 14:19
        +2

        Still 10% faster = waiting for 1 year, and only if you are gamming in 4K is pretty trash value. Given the weak Australian exchange right now, we might even see 10-15% increase in price for 10% faster only in 4K.

        Honestly I have a 4090, and that struggles with path tracing in 4K.

        • xyron on 24/01/2024 - 14:41

          True, if you want ray tracing at 4k this aint the card. im happy with just plain old rasterised frames.

      • Freddies on 29/01/2024 - 18:42

        I mean if you really care about the performance under 4k, you should look at 4080 or higher GPUs

  • Edyolo on 25/01/2024 - 01:57
    +3

    And 4070 ti super is available in store for $1500. 50% more $$$ for 3% faster in 1440p: https://www.centrecom.com.au/geforce-rtx-4070-ti-super?sc_sr…

  • lagur on 30/01/2024 - 02:47

    Mind if I ask someone what's the width of the card?

Login or Join to leave a comment
Login Join