This was posted 6 years 3 months 25 days ago, and might be an out-dated deal.

Related
  • expired

Lenovo Tab 10 16GB Tablet $148 @ Harvey Norman

50
Lenovo Tab 10 16GB Tablet $148 @ Harvey Norman
Go to Deal
finbar on 31/12/2017 - 20:59 harveynorman.com.au (630 clicks)

Key Features

The Lenovo Tab 10 X103F 16GB Tablet has a Snapdragon 210 processor and 1GB RAM to easily handle basic productivity tasks and run various apps.

Made with 16GB internal storage, the Lenovo Tab 10 has the capacity to hold important apps and files. For more storage space, it also has a microSD card slot (up to 64GB).

For shooting adaptability, the Lenovo Tab 10 X103F has a 5MP rear camera for group shots of landscape photos and a 2MP front camera for selfies.

The Tab 10 X103F Tablet has a 10.1" (1280 x 800 resolution) touchscreen for crisp visuals and easy touch controls.

Pre-loaded with Android 6.0 Marshmallow, this Lenovo tablet has convenient access to different apps from the Google Play Store.

Computing Lenovo Lenovo Tab 10 Tablet Android

Related Stores

Harvey Norman
Harvey Norman

closed Comments

  • Taegukgi on 31/12/2017 - 21:08
    +5

    Had one and sold it within one week.

      • redcreek200 on 31/12/2017 - 21:28
        +18

        This is a $148 tablet. Trying to compare specs with an ipad is nuts.

        • Axelstrife on 31/12/2017 - 21:31
          +1

          Im not sure you read my comment correctly, i did not compare any specs or anything to this specific tablet.

      • p1 ama on 31/12/2017 - 23:25

        I disagree, lacking USB OTG is a major flaw on the iPad. I love copying stuff to a USB drive (movies, PDFs…etc.) and just being able to view them on the go quickly and seamlessly. Not having file system access is another huge flaw on the iPad. It depends on how you use your devices. The iPad is more like an appliance, Android devices are more like computers.

  • Kaboda on 31/12/2017 - 21:10
    +9

    Wouldn't bother with 1Gb of ram.

    • b2dz on 31/12/2017 - 21:41
      +1

      I was about to post this comment.

      • stonkered on 01/01/2018 - 07:11
        +1

        I concur with this comment

      • Steptoe on 01/01/2018 - 13:04
        +2

        I was about to reply to your comment….but I waited.

    • PainToad on 31/12/2017 - 22:08
      -1

      Yep. No bargain here.

    • OrangeBJ on 31/12/2017 - 22:29

      absolutely!

  • Darry71 on 31/12/2017 - 21:14

    Not really a bargain for an old model.

    • terrys on 31/12/2017 - 21:18
      +1

      Surprisingly, it's a June 2016 release. I'm still using a Nexus 10 which is a lot older.
      Then again, it's comparing a Statesman to a Daewoo Lanos …

      • Consumer Sheep on 01/01/2018 - 06:29
        +2

        So the Nexus is for a bogan and the Lenovo for a hairdresser.

      • b2dz on 01/01/2018 - 08:33

        That's a very odd analogy.

        • terrys on 01/01/2018 - 09:15

          They both do the same job, but one does so in style and relative luxury. My 11/2012 Nexus is still going strong, has quite adequate sound for the class of device, HDMI port, wireless N. GPS and a 2560 x 1600 resolution. Its Dual-core 1.7 GHz Cortex-A15 was one of the fastest around at the time, and sufferers only a little in comparison with today's mid-ranged units.

          This unit, not the 2016 Tab 3 I thought it was, has a 1280 x 800 display that is not really that great, a slow processor and looks like something maimed at the market that wants something the kids can use in the back of the car.

        • b2dz on 01/01/2018 - 09:16

          @terrys:

          I think we have different tastes in cars.

        • terrys on 01/01/2018 - 09:17
          +1

          @b2dz: LOL. I've had both. One is a car I would look after, the other is a disposable toy.

    • chyawala on 31/12/2017 - 23:02

      Agreed, in technology terms this is a fossil, most likely useful as an expensive paper weight.

  • terrys on 31/12/2017 - 21:15
    +1

    " 1GB RAM to easily handle basic"

    For very small values of easy and very large ones of basic.

  • Selenium on 31/12/2017 - 21:30
    +2

    One of many tablets I've been looking at over the last week. All let down by that measly amount of RAM. If 1 GB ain't enough for a phone to run decently it sure as heck ain't gonna for a tablet.

    can't find any decent deals for a tablet with 1.5GB of RAM or more that isn't some random Chinese one from eBay/other dodgy places. Kinda sucks.

  • [Deactivated] on 31/12/2017 - 21:35
    +3

    1GB RAM

    Hahahahahahahahahahhaa

  • The Magic Pudding on 31/12/2017 - 21:57

    Usually when comments like these are made about a 1GB laptop it's going for $50

  • CarnivalMonkey on 31/12/2017 - 21:59
    +2

    if you only use it for non demanding things, it wouldn't be that bad. i have gone back to using my xoom (similar specs… from 2011) as a comic book reader while i look for a replacement of the sp3 i dropped….

  • jelko on 31/12/2017 - 23:37
    +1

    Yikes. Please don't give this to anybody. If you're stupid enough to buy this then you deserve suffer the pain of using it yourself. Don't inflict it on anybody else. They will hate technology and probably you too.

  • kingmoron on 01/01/2018 - 00:20

    basic productivity apps*:
    calculator
    google keep

    *not simultaneously

  • AMLagonda on 01/01/2018 - 03:09
    -1

    1 gig of ram… "LMFAO" "falls off chair"

    This is 2018! not 1998

    • jackspratt on 01/01/2018 - 04:08
      +1

      Which tablets in 1998 had any RAM, let alone 1Gb?

      • Steptoe on 01/01/2018 - 13:09

        In 1998 you only swallowed Tablets

  • drwau on 01/01/2018 - 07:47
    +1

    Guys what a load of idiotic comments, 1gb is more than enough to run basic apps and simultaneously. Its not pc, its not running windows 10, its running a o/s that was conceived for devices like these, some of you just have v6/8 envy. these run fine web browsing, etc. Just don't be dicks "oh 1 gb got to be rubbish" attitudes. Its not a cinema screen so why is display not adequate. It will display clearly the rubbish you watch online, does not have to be full hd. good you see people squinting looking at their mobiles on the train 5 cms from their noses.

    • terrys on 01/01/2018 - 09:22

      "the rubbish you watch online, does not have to be full hd"

      Most of what I watch on my devices is FHD and higher, even on-line. Given that this will most likely be bought for younger children and adolescents, they will clearly be able to see a difference between a HD screen and this one, which doesn't even meet that low bar.

      • hollykryten on 09/01/2018 - 23:37

        And these children might actually know the difference between what is HD and what is full HD. 1280x800 resolution is HD (720p). 1920 x 1080 is full HD (1080p). So this is a 720p HD display tablet. So this meets HD screen specification. Not talking about full HD specification.

        • terrys on 10/01/2018 - 08:18

          My missing out one letter is a distraction, not a cause for refutation. The clarification was needed tho :-}

  • TilacVIP on 01/01/2018 - 16:53

    Got one of these, they are crap, don't bother

  • cozmo on 01/01/2018 - 19:34

    I know most comments say this is no good, but im just looking for a cheap ~10" android tab i can wall mount for controller for my media centre i.e Kore with Kodi.

    Any recommendations ?

Login or Join to leave a comment
Login Join