![[eBay Plus] LG OLED65C9PTA 65" 4K UHD OLED TV $2,668.50 Pick up or + Delivery @ Video Pro eBay](https://files.ozbargain.com.au/n/61/518461.jpg?h=7ce893fa)
Marketplace
PLUV10
I think this is the cheapest deal going for the LG OLED C9, you can get them to send stock to your closest videopro also or pick it up from eagle farm. Use code PLUV10 at checkout.
[eBay Plus] LG OLED65C9PTA 65" 4K UHD OLED TV $2,668.50 Pick up or + Delivery @ Video Pro eBay
850
david6509 on 13/02/2020 - 12:42 ebay.com.au (1721 clicks)
Last edited 13/02/2020 - 13:35 by 2 other users
Last edited 13/02/2020 - 13:35 by 2 other users
Related Stores
closed Comments
waiting for the sub $2500
Same
Appliance centre should match soon.
https://www.ebay.com.au/itm/OLED65C9PTA-LG-65INCH-OLED-AI-TH…
It got price jacked I think, no longer thata price…
your right jacked the price, same with 65", guess it was a flash sale
Only interested in 77”
65” pointless over 2.5mtr for UHD https://www.rtings.com/tv/reviews/by-size/size-to-distance-r…65” pointless over 2.5mtr for UHD https://www.rtings.com/tv/reviews/by-size/size-to-distance-r…
But terrible when watching 1080p live TV.
Who broadcasts 1080p?
1080i which almost the same.
Who watches free to air any more???
I sit 2m away from my 65 which is perfect, but I'm 3m away in the theatre room, so I'll be getting a projector for that as even 77" is too small. To be fair, rtings recommended distance is more generous than others.
Thanks for letting us know 👍
I sit ~3m away and 100 inch is very good. Could have gone 110 inch but was worried about it not completely fitting in your field of view and having to move your head
100" would be great for that. I find that just at the point where you move your head a tiny bit is ideal.
Make me think I should buy at least 75"
OLED 77" too expensive.
Same but no one ever posts deals on the 77-inch C9 OLED here. Cheapest I've ever seen it is for $6,500. Waiting for it to hit $5K and I'll definitely pull the trigger.
Never gonna happen unfortunately.
Finally bought it
Ok I really need someone to talk about why I need to wait for blah blah blah technology and yadda yadda yadda features so I don’t buy this…
Waiting for sub 2.5k
They will sell out before it reaches that. Even at this price they will sell out fast.
Looks like the price has increased now to AU $3,270.00 before discount.
I notice this doesn't seem to support HDR10+, just HDR10 and Dolby Vision, whereas the Panasonic GZ1000 posted the other day features all 3 major formats. Not knowing much about this stuff (though I do know the basic difference between them), do you think this is an issue? For anyone familiar with HDR content (blurays, streaming etc) is there usually a preferred format?
If you don't know much about it, I really don't think it will matter to you right? HDR kicks in while watching netflix/blurary/etc with the C9.
I wouldn't want to spend 2 and a half grand on a TV only to find it doesn't support a format which turns out to be the market leader, is all. I guess what I'm wondering is, going out my way to get a TV that supports all major HDR formats might be fruitless if the industry creating the media itself has already picked a side.
In 6 months time there will always be something new FYI. If you don't have a requirement for something, then why worry? It's like buying an SUV because you think you might take it on some dirt, but then never ever drive it on dirt. Overall the C9 is a better TV than the GZ1000, so if standard support matters to you over tv ability, then for sure you could get the pana.
@onlinepred: Gz1000 over the c9 all day everyday. C9 is great for gamers though as long as you are careful about leaving a static image for too long.
@77chewieboy: Why? Nearly all major comparisons and blind tests put the C9 ahead of the GZ1000. Software wise it's better also, and of course it's far better for gamers, Dolby Vision, also better for anyone using apps on the tv for streaming etc with eArc and general UI responsiveness, also has hdmi 2.1. The major reason you would pick the Pana over LG is if you watch FTA majority of the time, or require upscaling of content. That's the only reason and way the Pana is better. I would pick up the pana if it was hundreds cheaper than the C9 for sure though - currently it's more than the C9.
@onlinepred: Well the gz1000 supports all HDR formats which I believe the c9 does not. Out of the box picture accuracy is the gz1000’s best strong point, I don’t know about everyone else but that is much more important to me than the c9’s better gaming abilities. Peak brightness is virtually a draw between the gz’s,(not the gz2000) c9 and e9 lg’s and the Sony oleds. Colour gradation and life likeness is better on the gz1000 too. avforums and hdtvtest both rate the gz1000 better than the c9 in almost every aspect besides gaming. I will never use my gz1000 for gaming so I never considered buying the lg at all. If I was going to use an oled for gaming I would definitely have brought a c9 or e9 though.
@77chewieboy: Yea I always tune my TV's via hardware camera/software. Not sure of those who are picky about tuning but then don't tune it right? Once tuned they are basically the same. Going forward HDR10+ won't be used by the looks of it, so not a big deal. Dolby Vision is being picked up by most streaming services which C9 has. And software wise the Pana beats LG on upscaling, but LG beats pana on UI and software ability, they are light years ahead of SONY/Pana when it comes to UI and speed. Also want to make sure my TV is slightly more future proof for inputs like HDMI 2.1 at the least. I also connect my PC via HDMI to the TV, but run optical to my stereo system so having the large lag on Pana due to video processing also makes it a bit of a neg for me - not even taking into consideration gaming. All depends on use case.
@onlinepred: When they are calibrated they are pretty much neck and neck for colour accuracy, as far as video processing goes Panasonic is better and no amount of tuning can change that, it’s in the software. UI doesn’t really matter to me because I use Apple TV rather than the built in OS. HDMI 2.1 is really only for gaming so I can live without it, same goes for input lag, I’m not going to be gaming on my OLED so input lag doesn’t worry me. My living room tv is a Panasonic dx900 which has been calibrated and the picture quality is honestly amazing, it runs the first version of Panasonic’s HCX processor so knowing how good that is made it an easy choice to go with the GZ1000. As an all rounder the C9 and E9 are probably the better option but for purely watching tv and movies the Panasonic is the best option. It’s a real shame Panasonic is leaving the tv market in Australia once all current stock is sold, just like when Pioneer stopped making plasmas,😢 My lx508 Kuro is still going strong and hopefully my GZ lasts just as long.🤞🏻
BTW the Panasonic also runs Dolby vision and Dolby atmos, although I actually prefer HDR10+ anyway.@77chewieboy: Oh right, my c9 has Apple TV app on it, so no need to connect Apple TV. Sucks you don't play games or anything. Luckily you don't use audio out of your Apple TV otherwise you would have the input lag issues too. I came from plasma Pana, and honestly it's not till you use good software that you realise how great it is. Sold my Chromecast, sold my Apple TV. It's faster and another than either. Multitasks too! Anyway if you are just a super basic user I can see why c9 doesn't appeal. I use my TV for loads of things and game on the side. Oled hdr gaming is incredible
@onlinepred: I definitely play my share of Xbox and ps4, mostly FPS too which is why I won’t use the OLED. 99% of the games I play have HUD’S and other static images so I use my Panasonic dx900 for gaming and HDR games look brilliant on this tv btw. My GZ is strictly used for movies and tv shows, the GZ1000 is the best OLED for this type of usage hence why I brought it.
@77chewieboy: Oh right I don't play hardcore games all day everyday haha. Just a casual PS4 gamer with a few hours a day here and there. You must play a lot!
HDR10+ is a lesser version of Dolby Vision. Samsung has stopped supporting it as it's not profitable. There are still a few Blurays released with them but won't be for much longer. Only a handful of titles have been released with HDR10+ and not Dolby Vision. DV can show some subtle differences but HDR10+ you need to squint and you'll miss it as it was barely an improvement. You're not missing out on anything trust me, it's already dead. BTW picture quality is better on the Panasonic than the LG, not by much though.
BTW picture quality is better on the Panasonic than the LG
That seems unlikely. It's the same panel made by LG.
@Diji1: There are subtle differences in image processing.
HDTV Shootout 2019:
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=Vj_oR91s1BU@Diji1: There's lots of differences other than the panel. Brightness nits, colour accuracy, motion, colour gamut, upscaling, tone mapping, contrast modulation etc.
I'm not sure what these comments are all about but I get you and Panasonic did their best to cater to you as being the first TV to cater to both formats.
From all accounts, I have seen they are similar but DV seems to have won the war, the TV will still do HDR from my understanding so I don't think you're missing out on much if anything by going for this TV.
Most likely you will find next-gen you will miss out again because it is no longer supported as it does similar to HDDVD and Blu-Ray
I know I am not buying it, but still like to go through the comments of people buying this and sharing that this TV is awesome!
Good Guys 2970 before $200 discount if you missed this one
you mean instore discount ?
Sorry on eBay :)
This didnt last long
Just missed it I was in school :(
Any idea how much the 65" CX is expected to cost?
Can you use this price with 28 degrees price protection?
Yes I got max $1000 back last year.
What ever price is offered, I'm going to wait until it's $price minus 10% before I buy.
Insert this into every TV deal comments section and we're done.
some cracker deals coming up for the 65C9….waiting for the sub $2500