This was posted 1 year 10 months 1 day ago, and might be an out-dated deal.

Related
  • expired

Dailywire+ Insider Plus Annual Subscription US$93.60 (~A$137, Was US$144) @ Dailywire

12354
PLUS

Awesome deal for very lovely ozbargainers. This is not a subscription to any podcast stuff this is subscription to enlightenment, entertainment and education of top quality standards. Listen, watch and enjoy. Don't thank me. Your welcome

Related Stores

The Daily Wire
The Daily Wire

closed Comments

  • +8

    OzBoomer.com

    • Your school teacher lied to u

      • My teachers taught me how to critically think and find credible evidence.
        Your teacher is Google "what I want to be true" queries.

  • +21

    Spoilers:

    A woman is an adult human female.

    • +10

      How darezz you!!!!!

    • +6

      Bigot

    • +2

      What is a woman?

    • This is an interesting definition - can you define a female?

      • A female is when a male has excess Fe that they must release some from their body.

  • +14

    In this day and age, with multiple degrees of left, right and center bias ingrained (and not necessarily advertised) into our news media, a well rounded view of the world requires us to consume our news from multiple sources; at the very least a daily bit from each end of the spectrum.

    Love em or hate em, these guys are intelligent, well read, polished and professional. Could do worse for your feed from the right.

    • https://youtu.be/X9FGRkqUdf8

      The intelligent bit is questionable

    • +1

      Yeah, I signed even though I don't like or agree with a fair bit of their content (their objection to helping the Ukraine especially) - I figure that's the case with all the other media I consume and pay for, so it's worth a shot for a year to support some competition for still-very-well-funded mainstream channels.

      Doubt I'll watch any of the YouTube stuff as I really don't care that much about US politics, but there are some interesting articles there. The Gina Carano movie was pretty good too - getting into entertainment seems to have been a smart move as their movies seem quite well reviewed, even by left leaning film sites.

  • +18

    haha. no thanks

    • +8

      What is your reason for downvoting based on the guidelines? How is this not a deal?
      Or are you abusing the downvote system based on ideology?

      • +11

        Dont want to pay for propaganda. Already paying through taxes for so much propaganda. Which i can not avoid. I hope it did not trigger you based on your ideology.

        • +2

          Or you can just not buy it
          No one’s thrusting it upon you.

          The fella asked you for a reason for downvoting this when it’s clearly a deal, maybe not for you.
          But some people - sure

          And you couldn’t even give a straight answer. For someone like that, you should be more humble with your world views.

          • @Gervais fanboy: I voted on my view on a public forum . For some people it's a deal and they up voted. Not sure what got you triggered? You could have just moved on rather being a snow flake

            • +2

              @Numbfeeling: ‘ I voted on my view on a public forum’

              That’s exactly what I and that other fella said. You acted based on your ideology when you don’t have an actual reason to question whether this is a ‘deal or not’.

              ‘Triggered’
              You have said it twice now, in the same thread.
              Projecting ?

              Btw I’d be a snowflake if I reported/disliked your comment and then sneak away. Something your side is quite rampant at.
              I just asked you a straight question that you still haven’t answered. ‘Triggered Snowflakes’ don’t do that

              • @Gervais fanboy: Not happy to pay for a propaganda. Not a good enough reason to be deal breaker for you. Was it that hard?

                • +1

                  @Numbfeeling: You are confusing facts with opinions ?

                  Daily Wire is propaganda - Your opinion (All good, your fundamental right)

                  You can only downvote a ‘deal’ if it’s like a scam or if there is no actual deal(savings) and not if you just disagree with someone’s opinions (ideology) — FACT

                  Surely, you are bright enough to understand it this time.

                  • +1

                    @Gervais fanboy: Daily wire and facts? Will rest my case. And if I want to bang my head against a brick will come back and have a chat. Peace.

                    • +2

                      @Numbfeeling: I never made a connection of DailyWire with facts
                      You just lied right now

                      And for the third time, you failed to answer by basic question.

                      • +2

                        @Gervais fanboy: Not sure if you had a bad fall when you were young? I will try to explain it one more time. Hopefully you will be able to to pick up. Shapiro tweeted something like

                        "Israelis like to build. Arabs like to bomb crap and live in open sewage. This is not a difficult issue. #settlementsrock".

                        He is always siding with occupational force which is deemed to be illegal by most of the international community. Recently a journalist was killed by Israel. And Shapiro was silent. So when you pick a side and blatantly support that regardless of what they are doing it becomes a propaganda. CNN always published negativity about Trump. But does that mean there was no good in Trump? No it means CNN is a propaganda machine. That's not an opinion that's a fact. Based on that, paying for propaganda is a bad idea. And I down voted.

                        • +3

                          @Numbfeeling: I never contested/defended the legitimacy around Ben Shapiro…. I never made a point about him being good or bad.
                          I never said DailyWire is a propaganda machine or otherwise.

                          Now with your most recent strawman you have quite deceitfully shifted goal posts and changed the subject.
                          I made a point about you disliking this post based on your beliefs (ideological grounds). Right or wrong in your opinions, you have breached the guidelines.
                          As there’s only a few listed reasons that allows you to downvote such ‘deals’. Your reason isn’t one of them.

                          Btw with this flow of personal insults from your end, It seems like theres something that’s got you quite ‘TRIGGERED’
                          As I haven’t at any point gotten insulting towards you.

                        • +3

                          @Numbfeeling: Btw did you report this fella https://www.ozbargain.com.au/comment/12346110/redir

                          Coz his comment got taken down unusually quickly.
                          Well, whoever reported him was just as disingenuous as your arguments are. As you have just personally insulted me with your most recent comment and clearly it wasn’t reported.
                          Double standards ?

          • +3

            @Gervais fanboy: Negative vote: Issue with product; Issues with retailer

            The way the product should work: "this is [a] subscription to enlightenment, entertainment[,] and education of top quality standards"

            The way the product does work: Deliberately creates discourse

            Issues with retailer: Retailer actively promotes hate speech and divisive statements and shouldn't be given money

            • +1

              @Jec: Please explain to me this ‘hate speech’ that you refer to…
              There’s a load of libs that have stated just that and wouldn’t elaborate upon questioning..

              • +1

                @Gervais fanboy: Ben Shapiro repeatedly makes homophobic and outright false comments as seen on twitter
                There's a list that I found at GLAAD (the Gay and Lesbian Alliance Against Discrimination) that I'll link here of various things he's said that are either transphobic, homophobic, or both.

                Both of these links were found literally just by google searching "Ben Shapiro homophobia" and "Ben Shapiro transphobia" respectively, I'm absolutely certain you could get similar results for most of the Daily Wire commentators (more likely for the more infamous names like Jordan Peterson, for example).

  • +12

    Obviously if you prefer your news left leaning, this isn't a deal for you. If you're centre-right, it may be worth a shot given most outlets here like that are behind a paywall (Sky, The Oz, DT etc). But keep in mind it's a US site with a strong US politics focus, especially Shapiro himself, so if you don't want to hear a blow by blow of every legislative tussle or critique of the White House Press Sec, may not be for you.

    I am kinda curious about the movies they're doing though, including the new Gina Carano one after Disney booted her out. Most of the deals I've heard for DW are 20% off so I guess if you're going to try our DW, might as well be this deal. Will give it a shot and then prob come back and complain in a couple of months.

    • +1

      It’ll be d-grade and very bizarre no doubt

      • +3

        Thank you Roger Ebert

      • -1

        Obviously they can't match the budgets of Hollywood. But they're smart to make the movies action focused as the actors aren't exactly Pacino and Streep. I'll see. Hopefully better than the B grade stuff on Prime Video

        • Haha it won’t come close to even crap tier on Plex let’s be real

  • +3

    Thank you for sharing OP.

  • +16

    There is a lot of stuff I can agree with Ben Shapiro on. On the other hand, there is a lot I don't.
    Same with Jordan Peterson.

    At least they are willing to challenge a lot of the nonsense going on in the world.

    • +1

      Jordan Peterson seems to have gone off the rails lately. Cries all the time, spends his time on culture war twitter nonsense, flirts with antivax conspiracies, writes non-sense about climate change etc. He does not seem well. He should make more effort to follow his own rules and just stick to providing practial psychology advice. He is just truning into some sort of preacher-guru

      • I guess the downvoters must be oblivious to these obvious issues with the man. Well, what can i say. If you need a preacher in your life then at least JP is better than many others

      • I am a big fan of a lot of what he has said and done. But it's hard to deny since coming back from rehab he has taken on a less intellectual, angrier streak. Perhaps because he's off the stabilising meds he was on. That said, going by his recent podcasts he still has plenty of intellectual capacity. It's just now offset by some Twitter tantrums that should be beyond him.

        • Likewise I think he has said some interesting things. However he seems to not be the same and is just going down the culture war rabbit hole

    • challenge a lot of the nonsense

      Specifically what?

  • +6

    Username checks out etc. etc.
    You can watch made-up nonsense for free on YouTube or a variety of "Alternative" sites. One dollar to this pile of cretins is a dollar wasted.

    • +1

      The movies are good. Only a few so far though.

  • +11

    The people that are false reporting this post should be penalised.

    What’s the crime here ?
    God forbid, someone has different opinions than you ?

    • +3

      They won’t even reply or respond to me but just sneakily dislike and F OFF…
      Because they don’t have anything to backup their deceitful ways…

      This is the real ‘Tolerant Left’ people. Take a bow.

      • Sorry that's a strawman.
        There really is ALOT of good people in Australia and generally they are against right-wing and left-wing rhetoric. If you changed nothing and published a deal for CNN+ (yes i know), you would see the backlash is very similar. We don't like services like the mentioned, hence why a lot people abhor "The Project".

        Downvoting?
        I am for it. The upvote function can be abused, so it needs something to counter-balance. And someone having an opinion against this, is not a thing that should be false reported on. It is 100% inline with community guidelines to downvote this.

        That is entirely the OP fault. His description said it was "enlightenment, education, and entertainment" so these criteria can be not-met, and justified according to the guidelines by the user for downvoting. And even if there was some truth to the claim, he followed up with "of top quality" which can also be argued against. I haven't downvoted this, but would you want me to?

        … personally, I rather people take this money and spend it on another subscription service like Brilliant, SkillShare, Khan Academy, or Patreon for the likes of Kurzgesagt.

        • +1

          Wow

          So ‘enlightenment, education, and entertainment’ are non-physical measures and differ from one person to another.
          Would you not agree with the fact there is a considerable number of DW subscribers that do feel enlightened and entertained from their content.
          You can’t thrust your opinions on the rest of the population.
          And as the post goes, the op was able to mention the promotional price and the savings one could make, the hyperlink to DW website. Now as the posting guidelines goes, op was able to accomplish the basics.
          Hence, he was reported out of spite rather than based on merit.

          And if you wanna justify this childish behaviour by saying that people on the other spectrum would also false report if it were a CNN deal, then how about you and I call out bad behaviour on both sides rather you over here, somehow trying to defend the indefensible.
          People false reported this - Fact

          • @Gervais fanboy: I'm going to regret continuing this discourse, but…

            "defend the indefensible" - funny coming from your position.
            "Childish Behaviour" - is your opinion.
            "Would I not agree there is a considerable number of DW subscribers that do feel enlightened, educated, entertained ?" - depends, if you're talking about 95% of their subscribers who are USA based. Or are you talking their Aussie subscribers? Remember this is a Bargain website for Australians and not a political discourse forum.

            I absolutely did not thrust my opinions onto the actions of anyone else here, and my comment history will corroborate this. You should probably redact that. My explanation above could be taken to show that I was defending people's freedom and right to downvote this.
            Are you against people's rights and freedom?

            If someone finds DW+ as "top quality" when it comes to enlightening, educating, and entertaining. Have at it. Upvote it, pay your money, subscribe. And even comment about it, we're here for free-speech*. But if this deal did not satisfy the description as "top quality" in any one or more of those fields, then the deal is open to be downvoted, and people are free to Not-pay, Not-subscribe, and report their objections in comment form. If things look wrong there is also the Report button. Lastly, you can even do a "No Vote" and simply comment or send message to members.

            You should be HAPPY about the Negative Votes. If you feel so strongly about this service, getting 60 Neg Votes should not deter you personally. If anything you should be expecting 120 Up Votes, so a 2:1 ratio. So there isn't much to complain as you are achieving what you set out to do, which is to spread awareness of this subscription and price.

            Now, if you have further questions you should contact:
            scotty, scrimshaw, neil, or hamza23.

            *free-speech does not include certain conduct, which are already covered under the community guidelines here.

  • +6

    If you want to get completely and predictably partisan takes on all American news designed to perpetuate culture war outrage then sign up.
    Sadly there aren't many non-ideological news sources around these days. However Daily Wire is even more ideological than many mainstream media sources. The only difference is in the ideology - religious conservative rather than woke liberal

    • +3

      I'm puzzled why anyone would want to get their news from any US media outlet, from PBS, NYT, CNN to Foxnews, DailyWire, etc it's just hyper-partisan opinion dressed up as factual news. Sure some of it's actually quality journalism, but you have to wade thru so much crap to find it.

      Unfortunately it's getting that way here too. Then there's the fragile-ego narcissistic journos that seem to think everyone wants their opinion & must lap it up.

      The best thing I ever did was subscribe to INKL, sure there's a fair bit of left leaning articles chosen, but the filtering of the 99% of BS is awesome. It's a pity the Murdoch press doesn't let their articles get republished.

      • +4

        One answer is that the culture of the west spreads throughout western nations - cultural phenomenon that originate in the united states are often exported to Australia and start appearing here, albeit with some delay. In this respect, following U.S culture can give us a heads up on what to expect.

        • +2

          Very accurate. Partisans here desperately latch onto US politics when our own is a bit (perhaps thankfully) boring

      • +1

        Yes it is a sad situation. I just want to read news with a netural, rational and scientiic approach. That seems to be getting rarer. American left leaning new sources perpetuate woke talking points unchallenged by rational though, obsess over identity politics and allow themselves to be bullied by left-wing activists. Similarly, right leaning sources promote religious ideas, deny climate change causes or seriousness, venerate the consitution and oppose its evolution, and think the free market and privatisation are the solution to all problems.
        It would be nice to have a scientific take applied to the news where the conclusion is not predictably predetermined by the ideaology of the outlet.

        Haven't heard of INKL, will check it out.

        • +1

          Haven't heard of INKL, will check it out.

          Here's the list of news outlets where they republish articles from. Your subs goto paying the original publishers.

          https://www.inkl.com/our-content-partners

          The Good News section is where I start my day, a fair bit of science in there.

          Did you know that Chinese spacecraft acquires images of entire planet of Mars - Reuters via @inkl https://inkl.com/a/wGrdNAFybWp

    • +1

      Another observation about Ben Shaprio. He is a skilled in advocating for a specific view point but he is bad at being impartial and at honestly searching for the truth. I think this is due to his training as a lawyer where you are taught to argue in favour of a viewpoint regardless of if it is true or not. The key is to select just the facts to support your argument. He would make a good lawyer but a bad scientist.
      I would much rather get my news from a scientist than a lawyer

    • +1

      The only difference is in the ideology - religious conservative rather than woke liberal

      No the real difference is the Daily Wire fully admit and celebrate their conservative ideological positions, the MSM would have you believe they are non partisan, fair and balanced.

      So who exactly is guilty of misinformation here?

      • +1

        Both

  • +3

    Get us a code for Jeremy’s razors!!!

  • +10

    "what is a woman" is a great documentary, highly recommend

    • +6

      My favourite part was when Matt Walsh tried to explain gender ideology to a tribe in Africa and they thought it was the silliest thing they have ever heard

      • +1

        I had totally forgotten that this was exclusive to them (well, outside BitTorrent I guess). Definitely curious to see. Matt Walsh can be pretty aggressive but based on his interview with Megyn Kelly on her pod, it seems like he was restrained. Personally I don't like confrontational journalism, though I liked Moore's Bowling for Columbine including his interview with Heston.

  • +2

    Just scrolling through their homepage, every mention of the GOP or the right is positive, every mention of the DEMs is negative.

    BUT, no mention of January 6th hearings and no mention of Roe V Wade being overturned (unless you count AOC saying without any context, "Just do away with the whole {supreme court}")

    • +1

      So literally the inverse of MSM?

      • +1

        yes, the Main Stream Media is generally… correct?

        Daily Wire is "Alternative Facts"

        • +1

          Yes mate. Big media is correct, small media incorrect. Head down and keep consooming. Attaboy!

    • +2

      You identified the bias. It's not difficult. He has, however, talked about both of those extensively on his show.

    • +1

      They are just selling a tribal product to make you feel satified that you are on "team good" and outraged that "team bad" is crazy and wants to destroy your way of life. Their business incentive is to fan the intesity of the culture war as that is what engages their customers

    • -1

      Kangaroo court

    • +1

      Not true on every point,

      Ben Shapiro and others there have often criticised the Jan 6th participants, they have criticised Trump on many occasions such as his election non acceptance. They support the revoking of RvW.

      Ben Shapiro didn’t vote for a Trump in 2016. He later warmed to him because of his policies.

      If you want to see blanket one eyed partisanship check out MSNBC or CNN.

  • +8

    Appropriate uses of negative vote:
    Issue with product-
    It does not work the way it should - It's a shoddy news source that's inaccurate and full of misinformation. Copying their bad behaviour from Wikipedia, downvoting and moving on because I don't want to engage with people arguing in bad faith.

    According to Snopes, "DailyWire.com has a tendency to share stories that are taken out of context or not verified", including an incorrect report on baby names in the Netherlands, a misdated, exaggerated story that protesters were digging up Confederate graves, a false allegation that Democratic congresspeople had refused to stand for a fallen Navy SEAL's widow, and a report that Harvard University was segregating commencement ceremonies (because black students had planned an optional event).The credibility checker NewsGuard assessed in 2021 that The Daily Wire "has sometimes misstated facts, especially about COVID-19" and "generally maintains basic standards of credibility and transparency — with significant exceptions".

    Various articles by The Daily Wire have engaged in climate change denial by making false or misleading claims when they dispute the scientific consensus on climate change. In 2017, when scientists writing in Climate Feedback described several Daily Wire articles as inaccurate or lacking evidence, The Daily Wire published corrections in two articles, after which the scientists assessed that the updated articles were still misleading. In November 2021, a study by the Center for Countering Digital Hate described The Daily Wire as being among "ten fringe publishers" that together were responsible for nearly 70 percent of Facebook user interactions with content that denied climate change. Facebook said the percentage was overstated and called the study misleading.

    The "Coronavirus Misinformation Weekly Briefing" by academics of the Oxford Internet Institute described The Daily Wire's coverage of COVID-19 lockdowns and the World Health Organization as examples of "junk health news" narratives in 2020.

    The Daily Wire incorrectly credited the Housing and Urban Development secretary, Ben Carson, with finding over $500 billion in accounting errors made by the Obama administration. FactCheck.org reported that the errors were discovered and published by HUD's independent inspector general before Carson became secretary.

    • -3

      Fact checked by Snopes. Wow! Very credible! Get of your bubble friend, it's a big world out there and you don't have to be terrified of things that are different.

  • -4

    Hmmm…I've noticed this thread is as of yet lacking the politically correct, though infinitely annoying 'can't we all just get along' post. Allow me to rectify.

    • Guys, let's all get along and respect everyone's right to have a different point of view.

    Now, having said that, I strongly believe that if your point of view holds little respect, knowledge of or care for the lives and experiences of those who don't look like you, or speak with the same accent as you, or come from the same place as you, then you're pretty much garbage.

    There. Thread stabilised.

    • +2

      Do we need all of those three strikes to qualify as garbage?

    • +1

      Wait a second

      Are you suggesting that Daily Wire is bigoted or hateful towards a certain group ?
      Coz to me, it seems like that you have suggested just that.
      I genuinely want to know why you say that ?

        • -4

          Hi
          Thanks for sharing that but it would have been better for this conversation if you would have also shared the breakdown by Ben Shapiro to backup his claims.

          https://youtu.be/g7TAAw3oQvg
          Here you go

          He does a systematic breakdown of why he labelled the majority as ‘radicals’. He didn’t call them ‘terrorists or ‘murderers’. Something your fact checked disingenuously implied.

          I hope you give me the same respect that I just gave you and review the content that I have just shared. And Hopefully, give me your honest take on the whole thing.

          Thanks

        • Nothing but silence ??

          • +2

            @Gervais fanboy: Sorry. To be fair to you, I didn't read it and I'm not going to cause I don't care. I don't think either of us are going to change anyone's minds today and I was an idiot for going anywhere near this thread in the first place.

            • @jonathonsunshine: "I didn't read it and I'm not going to cause I don't care"

              Well there you go

            • @jonathonsunshine: But you cared enough to share something without first fact-checking it,

              Mate, no one asked you to disingenuously post that link. You did it on your own accord and now you have flat out denied any responsibility to it.

              Whatever man

              • @Gervais fanboy:

                no one asked you to disingenuously post that link

                I posted it in reply to you asking why someone would think that Ben Shapiro's website, "The Daily Wire" was bigoted.

                But you cared enough to share something without first fact-checking it.

                It's a fact checking website run by a non profit set up to do exactly one thing and that is fact check stuff. It's also a widely respected source that's cited by many other reputable and real news organizations.

                it would have been better for this conversation if you would have also shared the breakdown by Ben Shapiro to backup his claims.
                https://youtu.be/g7TAAw3oQvg

                That is the exact same video Politifact was examining and it's linked in the article' introduction.

                Ben Shapiro posted a video cherry picking statistics to claim that the majority of muslims are radicals. Politifact writes an article saying it's bunkus and you've posted the exact same video, saying, "well, it's important to consider both sides."

  • American partisan bollocks. A bunch of middle aged red pillers that see the world in black and white that say to heck with anything that differs from their world view.

    • +1

      Just roughly (no references required), would you mind sharing the reason why you believe that ?

  • +9

    No interest in this let alone giving them any of my hard earned coin, but i'll up-vote just to balance the hypocrisy & intolerance being shown for differing views. What have we become to act so different to what we supposedly aspire to. Let people and ideas battle it out openly, anything less does not bode well for our future in my opinion.

  • +2

    I'm no Ben Shapiro fan, but anyone who has a huge issue with this is almost definitely an idiot. Sad to see so many on OzBargain, although can't say I'm surprised. Maybe get out of your fragile liberal bubbles, they're getting smaller every year!

    • +2

      Spot on. I wouldn't pay for these subs either. But people are so offended by it? lol

      Highly likely the reddit crowd on ozb, it's quite easy to brigde on this site just like reddit.

  • +3

    I wouldn't watch this trash even if they paid me Such horrible individuals and equally vile views

  • +9

    I saw that you mentioned Ben Shapiro. In case some of you don't know, Ben Shapiro is a grifter and a hack. If you find anything he's said compelling, you should keep in mind he also says things like this:

    Israelis like to build. Arabs like to bomb crap and live in open sewage. This is not a difficult issue.

    /R/authoritarianmoment for more

    • He's obviously Jewish, so will never look at that issue objectively.
      He's also "Pro life". Sigh.

      I get a laugh at him fighting with people regarding gender identity though.

    • -3

      Well, he isn’t that wrong on that is he ?

      Btw I also do recognise the fact that US did heavily contribute to the mass extremism amongst Arabs/Muslims.
      I’d be very happy to see Bush, Cheney and heads of the military industrial complex be trialled and hung for their involvements.

  • +1

    I find the OzBargain comment sections to be more enlightening.

    • +1

      much much more enlightening

  • +1

    Grifters be gifting.

  • What is this garbage.

  • +1

    this deal belongs far far far away from OzB, fake news isn't a deal

  • +2

    I'm negging this, not because I don't like their content or I have a problem with conservative viewpoints, but because for one simple reason: this is not a good deal. Most of the dailywire stuff you can simply watch on youtube. Exactly how can anyone justify paying 8 USD a month?

    For that money I can subscribe to crunchyroll or any other streaming service with vastly more content to go through with actual production value. And it's not like you are getting access to tons of other different contents and service.

    The OP claim that you are paying to get "enlightenment, entertainment and education of top quality standards." Like what? Is it just MORE of the same stuff they talk about on their youtube channel?

    I'm sorry but that's just not gonna cut it. How exactly are the subscription content any different from what you can get on their youtube channels? What exactly makes this a value buy? Is it because it used to cost 144 USD but now cost 96 USD?

    Sell me a pen.

Login or Join to leave a comment