Plastic Straws $9.34/100pc | $22.99/500pc + Delivery ($0 with Prime/ $39 Spend) @ shopeeflagship via Amazon AU

31956

Plastic Straws $9.34/100pc | $22.99/500pc + Delivery ($0 with Prime/ $39 Spend) @ shopeeflagship via Amazon AU

Affiliate

Go to Deal

Cashback

USER DC on 22/03/2023 - 11:21 amazon.com.au (2479 clicks)
Last edited 22/03/2023 - 17:42 by 1 other user

This post contains affiliate links. OzBargain might earn commissions when you click through and make purchases. Please see this page for more information.

Here's one for all those paper straw haters
5mm diameter and 210mm length
found in their lightening deal section

About this item
Unique Design: These straws are beautifully designed with striped patterns and colorful colors to meet the needs of different groups of people. Can provide a better dining experience for your guests and add a variety of colors to your party.
Safety Material: plastic stripe can bend safety material straws, reusable straws. Adults, children and pregnant women can use it with confidence.
Easy to Use: The bendable option adds fun and convenience to your drinking experience, allowing you to always maintain the correct angle when drinking, a great tool for you to fully enjoy the nuances.
Comfortable Packaging:
Various colorful striped plastic flexible straws for all your hot and cold drinking needs.
Versatile: Suitable for restaurants, cafes, homes, schools, offices and gathering places. Perfect for drinks such as smoothies, milkshakes, smoothies, and smoothie coffee, to meet your every need.

Love their description LoL Haha, these seller boast so much

Price History at CamelCamelCamel.

Home & Garden Straw

22 Mar 2023 8:35pm

Related Stores

Amazon AU

Marketplace

shopeeflagship

closed Comments

- - DashCam AKA Rolts on 22/03/2023 - 14:17
    
    Giving you a +1 so your negative vote for this post doesn't get revoked like mine.
    - UncleRico on 22/03/2023 - 14:43
      
      Been invited to any good dinner parties lately?
- jinkerjinx on 22/03/2023 - 14:02
  
  +3
  
  tharlow..
  you troll the air purifier bargains..
  you also don't like pure waterways?
  love to wallow in crap eh?
Jessie Ryder on 22/03/2023 - 13:30

+2

Thanks I'm going to stock up.
Will also get some extra for family and friends.
quog on 22/03/2023 - 13:33

+1

Need to ban condoms for the same reasons all the anti plastic straw say.
- UncleRico on 22/03/2023 - 13:52
  
  +1
  
  You never hear about all the condoms that greenies jam up turtle's noses for photo ops. It's an outrage!
  
  Those slow bastards need to do Darwin a favour and practice safe sex.
  
  Greenies, not turtles…
DashCam AKA Rolts on 22/03/2023 - 13:33

Don't buy plastic straws!
- spaceflight on 22/03/2023 - 16:55
  
  +3
  
  I buy stainless steel straws and use them as disposable straws so I don't need to clean them.
  
  Somehow that's apparently better for the environment.
- quog on 22/03/2023 - 17:10
  
  +1
  
  Don't do drugs!
  - TheCandyMan2020 on 22/03/2023 - 21:14
    
    Don't smoke meth….
    - Yummy on 22/03/2023 - 23:46
      
      Don't eat lollies.
raiseyoursteaks on 22/03/2023 - 13:34

+7

While the elites jet around in private jets, we have to get paper straws. I'm buying some of these
- huu on 22/03/2023 - 13:58
  
  +1
  
  Number of airplanes in the sky at any given time…
  
  https://encrypted-tbn0.gstatic.com/images?q=tbn:ANd9GcQopozk…
  - spaceflight on 22/03/2023 - 21:51
    
    That's a very misleading photo as when shown to scale, each plane is much smaller than a single pixel on your screen (to the order of thousands of a pixel)
    
    Or the other way around, if it was to scale each of those planes would be hundreds to thousands of kilometres wide.
    - huu on 23/03/2023 - 03:48
      
      +1
      
      🤦🏻‍♂️ what is this? a center for ants?
      - spaceflight on 23/03/2023 - 08:01
        
        @huu: 🤦🏻‍♂️ you're the one who shared such a misleading image. Plus it's not even a "number of planes" it's a blur of planes and has no meaningful value or use.
        
        UncleRico on 23/03/2023 - 08:04
        
        @spaceflight: It amused me. That has great value.
        
        Besides, it’s a screengrab not a misleading photo or journaled dissertation. I hardly think he was trying to pass it off as a scientific analysis of plane to earth ratios…
        
        spaceflight on 23/03/2023 - 08:10
        
        @UncleRico:
        
        Besides, it’s a screengrab not a misleading photo or journaled dissertation.
        
        Screengrabs can be misleading too.
        
        Especially when said with
        
        Number of airplanes in the sky at any given time
        
        Looking at the image someone could be made to believe that all you can see in American skies is planes. That's misleading.
        
        UncleRico on 24/03/2023 - 08:08
        
        @spaceflight: Oh dear.
        
        Please don’t ever attempt to digest an image of a bar graph. You could be fooled into thinking the twin towers are under attack again…
        
        spaceflight on 24/03/2023 - 12:31
        
        @UncleRico: Ah see a bar graph would actually be meaningful because it would have numbers on it to actually show the
        "Number of airplanes in the sky at any given time."
        
        Unless you can somehow decipher that from the image?
        
        You could even have 2 bars
        Number of airplanes in the sky at any given time
        Number of airplanes not in the sky at any given time
        There would then be values on the axis to give you the number
        
        But that would still be misleading because it isn't even an image of the number of airplanes in the sky at any given time because it doesn't show all planes.
        
        Aircraft that don't have a transponder aren't tracked, and there are a lot of planes that don't use ADS-B. There's also a lot of planes that fly lower than MLAT coverage and plenty of other reasons planes aren't tracked.
        
        UncleRico on 24/03/2023 - 18:10
        
        @spaceflight: Isn't it time you stopped getting your knickers in a knot over this one?
        
        Present company aside, I don't think anyone over the age of three could be misled into actually believing that there's a plane hovering over Tasmania which is larger than the state itself…
        
        spaceflight on 24/03/2023 - 19:48
        
        @UncleRico:
        
        Isn't it time you stopped getting your knickers in a knot over this one?
        
        Isn't it about time you stopped getting your knickers in a knot?
        
        Present company aside
        
        So everyone except you and me… (And all of Ozbargain!)
        
        I don't think anyone over the age of three could be misled into actually believing that there's a plane hovering over Tasmania which is larger than the state itself…
        
        So you you present company or do you not know what that statement means?
        Or are you under the age of 3?
        
        UncleRico on 24/03/2023 - 21:03
        
        @spaceflight: Me me? LOL!
        
        You’ve got to let it go, sir. No matter how much it upsets you, it’s simply not a photo of giant planes above the earth…
        
        spaceflight on 24/03/2023 - 21:08
        
        @UncleRico:
        
        You’ve got to let it go, sir.
        
        Sir!?
        Are you assuming my identity?
        
        I'm not holding onto anything, I'm just feeding the trolls.
        
        No matter how much it upsets you,
        
        Are you assuming I'm upset too?
        
        it’s simply not a photo of giant planes above the earth…
        
        No, it's not. It's an accumulation of pixels that doesn't even represent the "Number of airplanes in the sky at any given time…"
        
        UncleRico on 24/03/2023 - 21:21
        
        @spaceflight: Some people get way too upset over Flightradar24 pics and planes…
        
        https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=B7qK5HOlMW4
        
        You’ve got to let it go…
        
        spaceflight on 24/03/2023 - 21:24
        
        @UncleRico:
        
        Some people get way too upset over Flightradar24 pics and planes…
        
        I'll not even upset.
        You on the other hand…
        
        You’ve got to let it go…
        
        https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=moSFlvxnbgk
        
        UncleRico on 24/03/2023 - 21:26
        
        @spaceflight: Ok. You’ve convinced me.
        
        You have every right to be really, really, really cranky that someone apparently tried to mislead and confuse you by posting a vaguely relevant image that didn’t include a scale photo of planes and turtles choking on straws…
        
        spaceflight on 24/03/2023 - 21:32
        
        @UncleRico:
        
        vaguely relevant
        
        Do you even know what those words mean?
        
        Number of airplanes in the sky at any given time…
        
        Is not vaguely associated with
        
        Plastic Straws $9.34/100pc | $22.99/500pc + Delivery ($0 with Prime/ $39 Spend) @ shopeeflagship via Amazon AU
        
        UncleRico on 24/03/2023 - 21:39
        
        @spaceflight: Thank you for reiterating what I just said. You’re getting terribly upset about something so trivial which is only vaguely relevant at best.
        
        I can keep explaining it to you, but I can’t understand it for you…
        
        spaceflight on 24/03/2023 - 21:45
        
        @UncleRico:
        
        You’re getting terribly upset
        
        You need to stop assuming how I feel. You keep getting it wrong and looking foolish.
        
        I can keep explaining it to you,
        
        You're not explaining anything.
        
        but I can’t understand it for you…
        
        No you can't, because that's not how understanding things works!
        
        UncleRico on 24/03/2023 - 21:49
        
        @spaceflight: You are right. I have a very limited insight into why you are so upset.
        
        Perhaps you can explain what has you so confused about an image that everyone agrees has virtually nothing to do with the deal being posted?
        
        Even if you feel silly for mistaking it for a photograph or being misled about the number of planes on earth, there’s just no reason to appear so agitated.
        
        You really, really need to let him go, sir…
        
        spaceflight on 24/03/2023 - 22:25
        
        @UncleRico:
        
        You are right. I have a very limited insight into why you are so upset.
        
        You have zero and I'm not upset. Only you think I am.
        
        How many times do I need to keep telling you I'm not upset before you understand what it means?
        
        Perhaps you can explain what has you so confused about an image that everyone agrees has virtually nothing to do with the deal being posted?
        
        I never said I was confused.
        Only you think I am.
        Just like you incorrectly think I'm upset.
        
        Even if you feel silly for mistaking it for a photograph or being misled about the number of planes on earth, there’s just no reason to appear so agitated.
        
        I never said I was mislead.
        Only you think I am.
        Just like you incorrectly think I'm upset and confused.
        You're doing a great job of incorrectly telling me how I think and feel.
        
        I'm not even agitated.
        Only you think I am.
        Just like you incorrectly think I'm upset, confused, mislead and agitated.
        One day you might get one of my feelings correct…
        
        You really, really need to let him go, sir…
        
        Now you're assuming their identity too!
        
        If you are trying to promote your side business of Australia's most inaccurate psychic you're doing a great job. Keep it up!
        I'm glad I can help you promote your business and help it gain popularity. What's it called?
        
        UncleRico on 25/03/2023 - 01:05
        
        @spaceflight: Make up your mind. Either you were confused and mislead by the photo, or you were lying and upset when you repeatedly wrote, “That's a very misleading photo.”
        
        What’s it gonna be, hotshot? What’s it gonna be?
        
        spaceflight on 25/03/2023 - 10:10
        
        @UncleRico: Geez your really are a terrible psychic!
        
        You clearly have no knowledge that it's possible to make a statement without any emotion or feelings behind it.
        
        Someone can say "That's a very misleading photo." without any feeling behind it, especially because factually and it is a misleading photo when used with the statement "Number of airplanes in the sky at any given time…"
        
        How do you interact with other people in the real world without making a fool of yourself?
        
        Do you run over with tissues everytime somebody says something like "that's wrong" because clearly according to you their feelings must be hurt and they are crying.
        
        when you repeatedly wrote, “That's a very misleading photo.”
        
        Wow, you don't even know what simple common words mean.
        
        I never repeatedly wrote “That's a very misleading photo.”
        I said it once in one comment.
        
        You on the other hand repeatedly and indirectly try to tell me how I feel despite me repeatedly telling you that you are incorrect.
        
        https://m.youtube.com/watch?v=moSFlvxnbgk
        
        UncleRico on 25/03/2023 - 19:46
        
        @spaceflight: You precisely wrote “That's a very misleading photo” on one occasion.
        
        On three other occasions you begrudged being “misled” by, or the existence of “misleading” images, photos or screen grabs.
        
        Clearly you were speaking on behalf of people who were confused or conflicted by things that led people to ann incorrect understanding. That’s what happens when you are misled, and I understand entirely why you feel upset and confused, and now quite angry and frenetic as well.
        
        Thank you for confirming my suspicions…
Andard on 22/03/2023 - 13:42

+2

CANT UPVOTE THIS ENOUGH

PAPER STRAWS ARE THE WORST
- Duckie2hh on 22/03/2023 - 13:48
  
  +1
  
  Suck harder.
  - Andard on 22/03/2023 - 13:49
    
    +6
    
    Like you obviously are?
    - Duckie2hh on 22/03/2023 - 14:48
      
      -1
      
      Hey you are the one complaining about paper straws. I am merely recommending you suck harder since you are obviously having difficulties operating a paper straws.
      - Andard on 22/03/2023 - 16:55
        
        +1
        
        @Duckie2hh: Oh thank you. You seem very proficient at sucking. We could all learn from your ways.
End3vour on 22/03/2023 - 13:47

Apart from the obvious, how is this even a deal? 100 for $10 i.e. 10 cents each? LOL, they probably cost 1-2 cents at most to make.
- UncleRico on 22/03/2023 - 13:53
  
  +2
  
  Your iphone costs around $100 to make…
- dav3 on 22/03/2023 - 14:09
  
  +9
  
  It's a deal because now we get to sit back and eat popcorn and read all the online justice warriors melt from their devices made in shitty Chinese/Taiwanese factories which they constantly replace, shipped here via boats which pollute the water, between smearing mass produced chemicals onto their faces and putting on their favourite artificial fabric activewear, to drive their large SUVs a minute down the road to buy a bunch of mass produced chemical-filled groceries, who probably then come home via some fast food joint to their house which has the A/C maintaining the temperature of the place 24/7…. over plastic straws sold online.
  
  PS: I have no issues with the banning of single use plastics, just the virtual-signaling from people who just have to tell the world how empathetic they are to the sea turtles because it's cool at the moment.
  - werdplaya58 on 22/03/2023 - 14:33
    
    +1
    
    Buying the straws just to make a point is just another kind of virtue signalling IMO.
    
    Let's be honest, it's only a handful who could be bothered or have the forethought to carry straws around 'just in case', and even then it would probably be more practical (ignoring environmental concerns entirely) for them to use reusable straws than to carry a bunch of these around.
  - LowRange on 22/03/2023 - 16:34
    
    It's not a deal, not when it's way cheaper on Ebay etc https://www.ebay.com.au/itm/175077550553
Velocita on 22/03/2023 - 13:47

+7

Stainless steel straw.

Single use plastics, just say no.
- PainToad on 22/03/2023 - 14:47
  
  +2
  
  Metal straws are a death trap. If we’re banning anything it should be them. Paper straws suck but at least they don’t kill people.
  
  https://www.livescience.com/65925-metal-straw-death.html
  - LowRange on 22/03/2023 - 16:47
    
    I've worried about the same thing, i've had a cup and metal straw on the bedside table and nearly caught myself with it. So i use the metal straws with a bend in them, it doesn't eliminate the problem completely but makes it hard to impale yourself on them.
Duckie2hh on 22/03/2023 - 13:48

+1

Shame on you for promoting plastic straws.
- quog on 22/03/2023 - 17:12
  
  Name change Greta?
  
  Shouldn't you not be at school.
nedski on 22/03/2023 - 13:49

+5

Plastic pollution. Not a deal
- spaceflight on 22/03/2023 - 22:12
  
  It's positive for the environment because manufacturing these removes toxic oil from the environment to turn it into plastic to make these straws.
I Smell Pennies on 22/03/2023 - 13:49

+1

Guys, they’re like half this price on eBay lmao. Just because it’s an Amazon deal doesn’t mean it’s a good deal lol

Oh and stop using plastic!
- tharlow on 22/03/2023 - 14:34
  
  +2
  
  Does eBay offer free returns if your straws don’t suck?
  - I Smell Pennies on 22/03/2023 - 14:46
    
    +1
    
    Money Back Guarantee still exists ;)
    - tharlow on 22/03/2023 - 15:07
      
      Just wait for your straws to be delivered, complain to Amazon that they are banned, and receive a full refund. You obviously can’t return your contraband, for legal reasons
ozbargain2019 on 22/03/2023 - 13:50

+4

Bad value
- tharlow on 22/03/2023 - 17:20
  
  Ever tried to use multiple straws at once? That might be the value you’re missing… increase your liquid bandwidth for free!
PurchaseAnxiety on 22/03/2023 - 13:53

+3

I think moving away from single use plastics generally is a good thing, but I do find it funny and a bit baffling how straws have been targeted so specifically.
- tharlow on 22/03/2023 - 14:12
  
  It’s the last straw fo’ sho’
BillyBlaze on 22/03/2023 - 13:56

+2

I came here for the comments, was not disappointed
- tharlow on 22/03/2023 - 14:14
  
  You sound like you enjoy a good straw man
Uncle Roger on 22/03/2023 - 14:00

+3

Someone send these to 7/11 for their slurpees haiyaaaa
- UncleRico on 22/03/2023 - 21:19
  
  Hey bro…
Jcimdroy on 22/03/2023 - 14:01

+4

Negging for single use plastic and bad value.
- spaceflight on 22/03/2023 - 21:56
  
  +3
  
  They are only single use plastic if you choose to throw them away after one use.
  
  They are actually reusable.
7effect on 22/03/2023 - 14:12

+4

Wasteful, so many more environmentally friendly, more affordable options out there. No offence intended to anyone.
PumaPuma on 22/03/2023 - 14:13

+5

Impact on the environment.
- spaceflight on 22/03/2023 - 21:58
  
  +1
  
  It's positive for the environment because manufacturing these removes toxic oil from the environment to turn it into plastic to make these straws.
GettingThePlus190s on 22/03/2023 - 14:18

Boo
- spaceflight on 22/03/2023 - 22:09
  
  +1
  
  Do you drive or catch public transport?
richmond12 on 22/03/2023 - 14:23

+8

I dont like paper straws. There i said it.
CL7 on 22/03/2023 - 14:25

I want this to make a laminar flow fountain, but they aren't available in my state :(
bananabendera on 22/03/2023 - 14:26

+3

Would be cheaper and a step closer to being sustainable just to get one or more reusable straws whether they're bamboo, metal, or silicone.
- UncleRico on 22/03/2023 - 14:31
  
  +3
  
  Not to mention the delight of discovering that piece of rancid meat that got jamped mid-straw during the last wash.
  
  Saving the planet and building resilience. Even Greta would be chuffed with that…
  - snoopydoop on 22/03/2023 - 15:49
    
    +1
    
    Glass straws are good for ensuring they're clean. Much more economical than this deal too.
    - richmond12 on 22/03/2023 - 16:01
      
      +3
      
      Also make a good weapon
seamonkey on 22/03/2023 - 14:27

This thread is so spicy.
airforce on 22/03/2023 - 14:30

Here for the comments.. 🍿🍿🍿🍿🍿
WasBargain on 22/03/2023 - 14:34

+6

How dare you!

Bought 15,000.
nokidsandthreemoney on 22/03/2023 - 14:35

+1

Me after reading the 40,000 comments in this thread…

https://youtu.be/CMNry4PE93Y
truongster on 22/03/2023 - 14:35

Love non-paper straws but this isn't a deal. Cheaper on eBay as listed above.
Ok computer on 22/03/2023 - 14:44

Pretty much banned for most in NSW.
- UncleRico on 22/03/2023 - 15:26
  
  +2
  
  Well that's just great.
  
  What are we supposed to use to roll up over our fingers so we can flick the bubble in the middle, now?
- loropy9 on 22/03/2023 - 20:19
  
  +3
  
  Lucky I proclaimed sovereignty in my house last year, so the ban doesn't have effect here. Seriously though, single use plastic is banned but the corporate supermarket can freely give me mini toys made of plastic with every $30 purchase. I'd rather have the same amount of plastic in plastic bags. At least I can use the bags as bin liners. Or I can even use one to put over my head and suffocate when I'm forced to watch the rich hypocrites flying on private jets to their planet-saving meetings.
- TheCandyMan2020 on 22/03/2023 - 21:01
  
  Not for private use at home, just in businesses….
whyisave on 22/03/2023 - 14:50

+3

People using toilet paper,
debating about plastic straws
nekro on 22/03/2023 - 15:00

+2

Straws kill us all.
ozhunter on 22/03/2023 - 15:03

+3

Thanks OP
poweredbysugar on 22/03/2023 - 15:03

+3

Oooo, we got any deals on plastic bags too?
- lostgoat on 22/03/2023 - 15:15
  
  +5
  
  I never look . For me the inconvenience of carrying around bags vs buying roughly 100 a year for $15 is a no brainer .
miztadave on 22/03/2023 - 15:25

-1

So Amazon, as well as mistreating their employees and dodging tax, are now promoting goods that violate environmental protection laws and can cause serious environmental damage? Awesome….
- UncleRico on 22/03/2023 - 15:27
  
  +2
  
  How dare you!
  
  If it's any consolation, at least they're going to mistreat 9,000 less employees from now on…
- quog on 22/03/2023 - 17:14
  
  +5
  
  Sent from your iPhone?
  
  With a battery with materials mined by children?
  - tharlow on 22/03/2023 - 17:22
    
    You forget — kids grow up quicker overseas. And I don’t think they mind that much
Ozymandias on 22/03/2023 - 15:34

+2

Bad value, bad impact, bad deal.
jasonlka on 22/03/2023 - 15:42

+1

I feel this deal is grasping at straws…
Aidan0098 on 22/03/2023 - 15:59

+1

Destruction of the environment.
- spaceflight on 22/03/2023 - 21:59
  
  It's positive for the environment because manufacturing these removes toxic oil from the environment to turn it into plastic to make these straws.
[Deactivated] on 22/03/2023 - 16:07

+1

Tesla's 'vegan' (plastic) leather, supermarkets giving away tonnes of virgin plastic toys in instead of shopping bags etc.

The scams are bought left and right by the masses and plastic straw alternatives are just another one.

Having said that, anyone over 2 years old that doesn't have an issue should drink like a human from a cup with their mouth.

This was posted 1 year 1 month 18 days ago, and might be an out-dated deal.

Plastic Straws $9.34/100pc | $22.99/500pc + Delivery ($0 with Prime/ $39 Spend) @ shopeeflagship via Amazon AU

Related Stores

closed Comments

Top Deals

New Deals