![[NSW] 3kg Beef Eye Fillet Steak $99 (Was $180) + $20 Delivery ($0 with $195 Order) @ Tender Gourmet Butchery](https://files.ozbargain.com.au/n/21/840021.jpg?h=24afc679)
Excellent price for eye fillet.
Option to have it sliced into 200g or 330g (recommended) servings or leave as whole if you're doing a roast.
Delivery FOC for $195 otherwise $20. Pickup available in Hornsby store only.
Check Delivery areas.
[NSW] 3kg Beef Eye Fillet Steak $99 (Was $180) + $20 Delivery ($0 with $195 Order) @ Tender Gourmet Butchery
210
minty on 07/04/2024 - 10:24 tendergourmetbutchery.com.au (1706 clicks)
Last edited 08/04/2024 - 17:26 by 2 other users
Last edited 08/04/2024 - 17:26 by 2 other users
Related Stores
Comments
I was going to mention that however it states it's not applicable for sale item, hope it works :)
Worked for me :-)
scroll down and sign up to their newsletter for an extra $10 off
That's what the code is…
Tender Grommet Butchery 😂
any details on their beef? free of antibiotics, hormones, vaccinations?
Free of meat
Antibiotics and vaccines have saved millions of lives.
Grass fed cattle will receive antibiotics if they require it, the same as any sensible human would. Cattle in poor condition, in heavily crowded feedlots may require more antibiotics due to the increased levels of illness.Vaccines are regularly used to help prevent sickness and disease in livestock. They use vaccines for the same reason as we humans do, vaccinations provide better health outcomes.
https://www.mla.com.au/research-and-development/animal-healt…
Waiting for the vaccine sceptics to run out of shit to talk about and resort to, “You’re actually NOT meant to drink water”
Waiting for the vaccine sceptics to
Richard Feynman famously said: "Science is a culture of doubt; religion is a culture of faith"
We now live in an era of 'sciencism' where people who know nothing of science simply believe what the media tell them about 'science' then claim to be 'on the side of science'. Try not to be one of them.
@1st-Amendment: I doubt you know what you’re talking about, how scientific of me.
People being sceptic of proven vaccines and pushing that onto their children should lay on the tracks and doubt what the train will do.
I doubt you know what you’re talking about
Great! You have taken your first step to thinking critically!
Now the next step, produce some data to support your claim. Do you know what that is?People being sceptic of proven vaccines
Define 'proof'? Proof of what exactly? Be specific, science is about precision and accuracy, not hand wavy blanket statements like you heard the man on the TV telling you…
@1st-Amendment: Hahaha I’m not here to prove anything to a nut job on ozbargains.
We all know the script, the proof that I bring will be “disproven” by some “doctor” who lost their qualifications posting on a website that no one but a certain crowd sources because they’re “free thinkers” and not just sheep of a different herd.
Hahaha I’m not here to prove anything
I know… it is exactly how sciencism works… Who needs evidence and data when you can just say stuff then believe it!
We all know the script,
Yes we do. You make excuses for never being able to provide any evidence, exactly like you just did here…
@1st-Amendment: Just to be clear, you must use this method in every aspect of your life, right?
To buy a car you must obviously check the safety rating, but before that you obviously study what tests are done in the safety rating, who’s doing the safety rating, how many times they’re doing the safety rating, how are they recording the safety rating, are they the best ways to get a true outcome of a safety rating, what materials the manufacturer say each component is made of, what each component is actually made of, the statistics of fatalities in the at model and everything else that could possible come up in a 2 tonne vehicle you will potentially be travelling 110km/h in, right?
Say you want to buy a microwave safe plate. You obviously check what materials aren’t affected by microwaves, what material the manufacturer tells you it’s made of and test if it’s actually made of those materials. Can you use microwaves? Assuming you found one with enough data to fulfil your stringent requirements, have you studied electromagnetic radiation and the effects it can have on food? Do you have an EMF reader that lives by the microwave to make sure it isn’t emitting any radiation?
What tests do you run on each glass of water you drink?
Surely you don’t just hold these standards for one or few aspects of your life? That seems completely irrational, like a cult mentality.
It would be hypocritical to take any quality standards by anyone at face value.
you must use this method in every aspect of your life, right?
This is the reductio ad absurdum logical fallacy…
That seems completely irrational, like a cult mentality.
Sure, becasue you created a strawman then argued against it. That is irrational.
It would be hypocritical to take any quality standards by anyone at face value.
Only if you all things in your life carry the same risk weighting, which obviously they don't. It's not only zero or 100, there are levels in between.
Using the Covid vaccine as an example. If it's crazy to be sceptical about the first shot is it also crazy to be sceptical about the second? Why/why not?
What about the 3rd? 4th? 5th? 6th? Have you had all 6 shots? If not, does that make you a 'crazy anti-vaxxer' too since you have not had all vaccines?@1st-Amendment: These are things that could potentially kill or harm you every day of your life. Why would they not be as important? Because it’s inconvenient?
It’s not a strawman, it’s the same application of expectations with other potentially deadly things in your life.
All these could absolutely kill you if there wasn’t a standard they’re built to, you’re telling me that standard isn’t good enough but only when we’re talking about vaccines.
@NuttyGoodness: I see you avoided my questions. How many boosters have you had?
you’re telling me that standard isn’t good enough but only when we’re talking about vaccines.
And I already answered this one…
@1st-Amendment: How many boosters I’ve had isn’t important to any of this. You’ve drawn a convenient and arbitrary line that excludes vaccines from the things you need extensive research from.
I could draw my own convenient and arbitrary line that includes vaccines so none of this conversation matters.
How many boosters I’ve had isn’t important to any of this
Of course it matters. If questioning one vaccine is 'crazy', why is questioning two vaccines 'not crazy'? It's about hypocrisy.
You’ve drawn a convenient and arbitrary line that excludes vaccines from the things you need extensive research from.
I already answered this, and everyone does this based on risk. Experimental medicines that have no long term testing done are high risk. They have very real risks that can cause serious medical problems, in some rare cases death. I know someone personally that is suffering from the side-effects of the Covid vaccine. This does happen to some people.
When weighing that up risk with the risks of Covid which we know has very low impact on younger fitter healthy people, then the scepticism is valid. Having had Covid 3 times now I'm quite confident that the hype was overblown for low risk groups.In your given examples for cars, I do exactly the same thing with cars. I have an engineering background so am quite familiar with standards and test procedures.
For plates I put in the microwave not so much because the risk is much much lower. But yes having a science degree I have studied electromagnetic radiation so am quite confident that the risks are low.I could draw my own convenient and arbitrary line that includes vaccines so none of this conversation matters
Well it matters because you're not drawing the line just at 'vaccines', you've drawn the line at 1 vaccine vs 2. Or 2 vs 3.
At some point whatever logic you used to demand everyone be forced to have a vaccine or be run over by a train, you didn't consistently apply to yourself for the 2nd shot (or 3rd or wherever you decided that vaccines we're no longer worth worrying about).We can all have different standards, but you should at least be consistent with your own standard before wishing death on people with different standards than yours.
@1st-Amendment: Literally boosters have nothing to do with this conversation at all.
I will say again, because it seems as if you’re the one arguing against a straw man.
People being sceptic of proven vaccines and PUSHING THAT ONTO THEIR CHILDREN should lay on the tracks and doubt what the train will do. E.g parents refusing to get their child vaccinated against polio and whooping cough.
Get as many or as few of the boosters as you want, I couldn’t care less. Putting your scepticism above the health of your child with vaccines proven for decades is insane.
Literally boosters have nothing to do with this conversation at all.
Boosters are vaccines. You said people who don't taken vaccines should be run over by a train. This has absolutely everything to do with your comment on this.
If you haven't taken all 6 boosters then you are the very thing you are criticising others of.it seems as if you’re the one arguing against a straw man
It's not a strawman, your argument is that people who are sceptical of vaccines are crazy, and should be killed, and I have just shown that you are sceptical of vaccines because you haven't taken all 6 Covid vaccine boosters.
People being sceptic of proven vaccines
Back to the beginning, proof of what specifically?
Get as many or as few of the boosters as you want
Boosters are 'proven' according to you so why haven't you taken all 6 boosters? Are you a crazy anti-vaxxer? Should you be run over by a train?
vaccines proven for decades is insane.
The Covid Vaccine was released only a few months or after it was invented. There was no long term tests, no proof at all.
You might be too young to remember Thalidomide. Or if you want a more recent example, check out the last night's episode of Four Corners on Medical malpractice.
The experts said it was safe… trust the experts they said…@1st-Amendment: It’s literally not what I said, now you’re just lying. I wrote exactly the same sentence as before, ignoring convenient words in the sentence I wrote is literally a straw man. You’re just embarrassing yourself now.
I never once said I cared what people did with their own bodies that they themselves have control over. The amount of vaccines I have had is completely irrelevant unless I criticised the individuals deciding for themselves, which I did not.
If you don’t care to argue the ACTUAL sentence I wrote, then just admit you were wrong and we can all go about our day.
It’s literally not what I said, now you’re just lying
Here is what you literally said: "Waiting for the vaccine sceptics to run out of shit to talk about and resort to, “You’re actually NOT meant to drink water” https://www.ozbargain.com.au/comment/15142416/redir
Which you then literally said "People being sceptic of proven vaccines and pushing that onto their children should lay on the tracks and doubt what the train will do." https://www.ozbargain.com.au/comment/15145651/redir
so you are criticising vaccine 'sceptics' for being sceptical of the vaccine when you yourself are also sceptical. It's all there in balck and white.
I never once said I cared what people did with their own bodies
Yet your quotes above say otherwise.
The amount of vaccines I have had is completely irrelevant unless I criticised the individuals deciding for themselves, which I did not.
See quotes above.
If you don’t care to argue the ACTUAL sentence I wrote,
I just did.
then just admit you were wrong and we can all go about our day.
I wonder if you could do the same?
This is where a science education comes in handy. I've supported all my claims with evidence, you have only given me your opinion.When deciding who is likely to be right and who is wrong, evidence beats opinion every day of the week.
@1st-Amendment: I don’t know how a nuclear power station works but I still believe they exist and can generate electricity. I don’t understand how gravity works either, but I’m going to trust the boffins on that one too. Most people don’t have a deep understanding of anything, yet we trust the inherent knowledge of specialists.
We live in an era of “do your own research” where 15 minutes on YouTube makes you an expert in anything and that’s the real problem.
I don’t know how a nuclear power station works
I do know how they work. I have a physics degree to prove it.
But even if you don't know how they work are you at least able to see the inconsistency that we've had a Nuclear rector in our largest city for the last 65 years, but cannot use it to generate power? Why exactly? Do you ever ask yourself question like that?
Why is it ok to build new nuclear submarines to sail around the country and sit in our ports, but we can't build new nuclear power stations?I don’t understand how gravity works either, but I’m going to trust the boffins on that one too
No-one actually know how gravity works. We know how it behaves, but how it works is still one of the great mysteries of physics.
You can also validate how it behaves for yourself so you can be sure that the equations are correct.Most people don’t have a deep understanding of anything, yet we trust the inherent knowledge of specialists.
So how do you decide which specialist to trust?
Whoever the media puts on the TV that day? Trusting a media producer or editor doesn't seem to be a great way to determine truth.We live in an era of “do your own research” where 15 minutes on YouTube makes you an expert in anything and that’s the real problem.
Actually, the bigger problem is people who see an 'expert' on commercial TV and think that is the only possible truth. And even though an equally qualified expert has a different opinion, people ignore them because they aren't on commercial TV. Again how do you decide which expert to trust?
Did you trust the top Climate chief when he said the dams will never be full again, shortly before they were full?
Or more recently when BOM said this Autumn would be a dry one, right before we got higher than normal rain?
Did you trust the top RBA chief when he said interest rates wouldn't go up, shortly before they went up?
How about when the top Covid officer said that the vaccine stops the spread shortly before they turned around and said that it didn't?
@1st-Amendment: Feynman was right - and to a limited extent so are you regarding media headline "science" (best not to judge others by your own poor standards though) - but he'd have been rolling on the floor laughing at the irony of your comment had he read many of your posts on this website. This is an absolute classic case of oblivious hypocrisy; https://www.ozbargain.com.au/comment/15145892/redir
Had you (more accurately) written: "We now live in an era of anti'sciencism' where easily fooled people of a particular demographic who know nothing of science reject its knowledge and expertise - and its earned "authority" (that word again) - simply because it doesn't fit their blinkered narrative" I'd have upvoted you.
To be fair fos' reference to antibiotics has some validity, particularly wrt (US) feedlot cattle. Here's some - trigger alert - "media science" which summarises the issues well; https://www.une.edu.au/connect/news/2022/01/feedlots-may-be-…
Can you even buy American feedlot cattle in Australia? I've never seen it available. We have better beef with none of their issues.
@OzzyBrak: Australia has plenty of feedlots of its own.
https://www.goodmeat.com.au/animal-health-welfare/feedlot/
https://www.worldanimalprotection.org.au/news/beef-cattle-fe…
It should be a criminal offence to roast eye fillet, even a steak on this cut is borderline unless you're on weight watcher list.
You what now?
He’s an enlightened carnivorous gentleman who knows the REAL way to eat eye fillet is to grind it into sausage meat
In all seriousness, a padded van should come round to collect you if you get so worked up about the techniques people use to cook the meat they bought.
I’m going to reverse sear in a sous vide for instance. You could chop it into cubes and eat it out of a stainless steel bowl on the floor like a dog. I would say have fun lol
Proper chuckled out loud at that. Well played. I must say I was surprised because roasting a fillet of beef - including eye fillet - is commonplace, especially in Europe. It's only here & north america we tend to slice everything up and sear it on a grill because weather & climate.
@The Judge: Even in North America a lot of places will serve a roast prime rib. And it’s delicious, perfectly cooked medium rare without the huge cooked surface area of a steak.
Or do a beef Wellington with it. That’d be a nice use imo.
@The Judge: chateaubriand with bernaise sauce , classic, great way to use the butt piece of eye fillet , it’s a roast ….the butt is made of 3 muscles so not nice for grilling as a steak as the center cut which is used for fillet mignon.
Eye fillet, medium rare - medium, is my favourite steak, I pretty much don’t even eat steak unless it’s eye fillet. The less fat a steak has the better it tastes and I just can’t comprehend how people proclaim marbling and more fat is better. I guess everyone tastes differently.
I agree with you I prefer 0 fat in everything except romantic partners.
Chef prepared Tournedos Rossini - just wow.
I was just about to head out to pick up some eye fillet steaks to cook tonight and couldn't believe my eyes when I saw this deal.
Too bad I can't pick these up today. Earliest pick up date according to the website is tomorrow.I was wondering whether anyone buys this meat at full price. $60/kg — that's a lot of money.
I usually keep an eye out for something like this and buy a year's worth (5x 3kg in this instance), got 3kg last week to split with my parents and it was delicious, before pulling the trigger.
$60kg is expensive when buying a whole eye fillet $35 is more typical for a whole piece, $50-60 is price for by the slice for center cut / fillet mignonette and you select the best slice of course.
Wonder if this is economy grade? and nice and grey with oxidation. Harris farm have that for $35/kg all the time. 3star old steer. roast that.
Coles have cryo-vac eye fillet and rib eye which is decent and almost as good as meat emporium 4star. roast or pan fry.
Meat emporium has good stuff for about $90-130/kg. bbq/cast iron pan.
expensive these days
Damn, seems to only ship around Sydney. My parents live SNSW and their suburb is not on the list
30/kg is the regular price at aldi….
Use code 'W3lcom32024' for $10 off.