This was posted 7 months 1 day ago, and might be an out-dated deal.

Related
  • expired

Up to $3500 off Tesla Model 3 Inventory (from $54,600 + ORC) @ Tesla

22830
Up to $3500 off Tesla Model 3 Inventory (from $54,600 + ORC) @ Tesla
Go to Deal
tempting on 04/04/2025 - 23:13 tesla.com (6073 clicks)
Last edited 11/04/2025 - 14:38

Reduced Pricing Available Until 30 June 2025
Available for Select Model 3 Inventory.

Reduced Pricing Available Until 30 June 2025

Order and take delivery of a new or demonstrator Model 3 inventory vehicle by 30 June 2025 to be eligible. Purchases of used vehicles are not eligible for this offer. Available while stock lasts. Tesla does not guarantee inventory vehicle stock availability or delivery of vehicles by 30 June 2025 and may make changes to the terms of this offer. Offer valid until 30 June 2025 unless extended, modified or terminated at Tesla's discretion.

Referee Gets $350 off a Model 3 or Y (Excl Model Y Launch Series) Purchase, Referrer Gets $150 Tesla Credit

—-

Update 11 April: Few new inventory now reduced up to $3500 off (from $54,600 + ORC). Updated title.

Tesla Referrals

Referral: random (711)

Referee gets $350 off Model Y & 3 purchase.

Referrer gets $150 credit toward Supercharging, software upgrades, merchandise, service payments or a new vehicle. Limit of 10 referral benefits per calendar year.

Automotive Car Tesla Inc Electric Vehicle

Related Stores

Tesla
Tesla

closed Comments

Search through all the comments in this post.
      • dealhunter52 on 04/04/2025 - 23:31
        +70

        Some idiots here are more loyal to Trump/Musk than Australia.

        • hcl on 05/04/2025 - 01:03
          +12

          Some here are loyal to 2020s Australia, some to 1920s White Australia.

          • garage sale on 05/04/2025 - 10:07
            -1

            @hcl: 1990 australia when houses were cheaper, roads less congested and there was no gig economy.

        • Fuzor on 05/04/2025 - 01:12
          -3

          Did you say that when we followed Bush Jr to find weapons of mass destruction in our Iraq invasion? If not, why even mention it now with Trump?

            • wtfisgoingon on 05/04/2025 - 08:11
              +4

              @belongsinforums: Wot? People don't like Trump because he's a moronic egomaniac who is burning the world economy to the ground. It's got nothing to do with Christian nationalism…

              • belongsinforums on 05/04/2025 - 08:17
                +3

                @wtfisgoingon: Trump is just doing what he said he'd do. And the majority of Americans voted for him

                • wtfisgoingon on 05/04/2025 - 08:22
                  +7

                  @belongsinforums: Sure. That doesn't affect whether I, as an Australian, am allowed to say I dislike him?

                • wtfisgoingon on 05/04/2025 - 08:25
                  +8

                  @belongsinforums: Also Obama and Scomo both talked about their Christianity in wildly different terms. Scomo literally said he was on a mission from god. Obama talked about his Christianity as a connection to community. Why do you think these things would be treated like they're the same by people?

                • saltypete on 05/04/2025 - 09:23
                  +5

                  @belongsinforums: Correct.
                  USA has a disease and Trump is the weeping boil that shows it. He's disgusting, but there is a big problem underneath - shades of which are affecting other Western countries - including dear old OZ.

                • Shaun Ross on 05/04/2025 - 09:43
                  +2

                  @belongsinforums: Actually only 71 million did in a country of 377 million people the majority did not vote .
                  And pH hot nearly 70 million and he has so far done the opposite to what he run for he hasn't done one thing to help the American people apart from his billionaire friends. If you was to have the election today 67% would not vote for him again. If this was Australia he would have been out of a job well he wouldn't have had it in the 1st place

                  • belongsinforums on 05/04/2025 - 11:27

                    @Shaun Ross: Not voting is the same as voting for Trump, effectively. He ran on the promise of tarrifs and tried implementing them last time too. He also ran big on anti immigration and has fulfilled that. Nothing he's doing is a surprise. To say otherwise is ignorant

                • Randolph Duke on 05/04/2025 - 13:09

                  @belongsinforums: Got 1.5% more votes than Harris of the people who bothered turning out, and didn’t clear 50%. Sure, there is a majority, but it’s hardly the overwhelming mandate the White House and his sycophant supporters portray it as.

                  Wonder how many registered voters who didn’t bother leaving the house are feeling now about their choices.

              • gasman70 on 05/04/2025 - 09:34
                -5

                @wtfisgoingon: I agree, the man is a buffoon, and a dangerous one at that. And the court jester Musk is on a power trip that money alone cannot buy.

                But Tesla's are great cars. People need to be able to separate the two

                • wtfisgoingon on 05/04/2025 - 09:57
                  +4

                  @gasman70: What separation?

                  Musk is using the money from the purchase of Tesla cars to empower Trump. He literally bought votes in Wisconsin by handing out cheques. By buying Tesla cars you are enabling further empowerment of Trump.

                  There is no separation. Buying Musk's products directly empowers Trump.

                  • gasman70 on 05/04/2025 - 10:14
                    -1

                    @wtfisgoingon: Do you realise how much Musk is worth? You think that not buying a Tesla today will change anything?

                    What if they got rid of him as CEO….would you still consider Tesla to be 'toxic'?

                    • wtfisgoingon on 05/04/2025 - 10:20
                      +2

                      @gasman70: This is the problem with Australians. We long ago gave up any sense of our political power and are completely incapable of thinking about things through the lens of collective action. It's why unions are struggling with membership and why workers keep getting taken for a ride.

                      My individual decision would not, no. The collective decisions of every person around the world who is in the market would. It would crater the value of Tesla and inflict personal economic pain on Musk, which in turn may make him step back.

                      By choosing to ignore that, and think solely about yourself and what is best for you, you cede all power and participate in a system that is enabling and powering Trump. Solely because you want a specific brand of car.

                      If Tesla got rid of Musk as CEO and he divested from the brand, I would not judge people who bought one. As it is, I consider it a morally indefensible decision.

                      • gasman70 on 05/04/2025 - 14:11
                        -3

                        @wtfisgoingon: The moral angle can be directed at almost everthing we buy, whether it's milk, Nike's, Apple products, almost all clothing manufacturers, Chinese made product, petroleum products, etc.

                        We either buy what is right for us, or what's right for humanity. There is very little inbetween.

                        Let he without sin……..

                        • wtfisgoingon on 05/04/2025 - 14:33
                          +5

                          @gasman70: There is a huge moral difference among all those things. It's immensely shortsighted to say that just because everything can have a moral consequence there is no need to question the morality of anything.

                          The moral difference between me buying a chicken from a local free range farmer who has raised it in a low impact way is wildly different from buying it from a factory farm. The moral difference between me buying milk is wildly different from me buying shares in a weapons company.

                          My EV is a Hyundai. While Hyundai are far from perfect, I made a moral assessment of them as a company versus Tesla and decided they were a company I preferred to support.

                          Just because everything has moral consequences does not mean those moral consequences are equal and does not mean we can abstain from the moral consequences of our actions.

                          • gasman70 on 06/04/2025 - 09:27
                            -4

                            @wtfisgoingon: My examples were deliberately wide ranging, but buying a pair of Nike's or an iPhone made in a Bangladeshi sweatshop, or a Chinese prison is OK for you? How about buying a General Motors, Tesla, BYD, Toyota, or Volkswagen? All of these are directly linked to the forced imprisonment and labour or the Uyghurs. Is this morally OK? Is buying a Tesla really so bad? Of course Musk is an imbecile, and driven by power. He's making some awful decisions, both politically and business wise, and I've no doubt they will come back to haunt him, but Trump is not in power purely because of him. Let's be honest here, winning an election with Trump as your opponent should be an easy victory.

                            Anyway, you do you, and let everyone else do them.

                      • gasman70 on 05/04/2025 - 14:12
                        -1

                        @wtfisgoingon: …and I fully support your decision to choose, either way.

                        ……and agree with the lack of collective thinking these days. I am a big, big supporter of unions.

                • garage sale on 05/04/2025 - 10:12
                  +2

                  @gasman70: they are still making cars, people are still buying and enjoying them, why would you buy an inferior car to make a point they don’t care about. bigger problem for tesla is china makes batteries, cheaper labour and it’s created more options for EV buyers, people buy based on price and features.

          • ripprind on 05/04/2025 - 07:12

            @Fuzor: This is stupid, almost sounds like you are trying to make a joke.

            Iven it it was a fair comparison - there are plenty of users at OB who weren't alive of politically active at the time of the start of that war. That doesn't mean they can't have, or voice their opinions now or that it's inconsistent to do that.
            Even if he was old enough, and engaged, 20 years is plenty of time to fundamentally change ones political views.

          • wtfisgoingon on 05/04/2025 - 08:11
            +1

            @Fuzor: You may recall that our decision to follow Bush Jr to Iraq resulted in some of the largest protests in Australia's history. So yes, people did say that.

            • Fuzor on 05/04/2025 - 17:06

              @wtfisgoingon: At least Trump admits the Iraq invasion was wrong and stupid. Have anyone here said anything along that line? All we did was put out ads about being alert but not alarmed at these Iraqi terrorists

              • gmatht on 05/04/2025 - 17:16
                +1

                @Fuzor: Great that he is willing to admit that invading a dictatorship like Iraq was wrong, similar with Afghanistan and so on. Has he admitted that invading a democracy like Canada, Denmark, or Panama would be even worse?

              • wtfisgoingon on 05/04/2025 - 19:07

                @Fuzor: Ummm… Obama beat Hilary Clinton in the primary in no small part because he opposed the Iraq war. The Labor party at the time opposed Australia's participation in the Iraq war. I'm really not sure where you're getting this weird idea that everyone in Australia supported it?

                I personally marched against the Iraq war. Although granted I was a young teenager and heavily influenced by my parents.

                By contrast, Trump only vocally opposed the war after public sentiment turned against it:https://www.factcheck.org/2016/02/donald-trump-and-the-iraq-war/

                Why are you pushing this dated political issue? Do you want a reason to support Trump?

        • rooster7777 on 05/04/2025 - 01:51
          +29

          That's a ridiculous assessment. A tariff is a CUSTOMS DUTY levied on imports to increase the cost relative to domestically produced goods.

          Previously imports less than $1K value avoided paying ANY APPROPRIATE customs duty, as well as the 10% GST that applies to all australian goods (ignoring minor categories like raw foodstuffs) Most classifications of goods imported to australia don't face any customs duty (ie tariff)
          …..meaning that imported goods had at tax ADVANTAGE over local goods because GST wasn't paid on them.

          Removing that $1K import threshold exemption means that imported goods pay the same GST as australian goods. That's not protection, and it's not a tariff.

          • 50cent on 06/04/2025 - 17:43

            @rooster7777: Actually, from an Australian perspective, Trump’s trade policy—particularly his use of tariffs as a negotiating tool—deserves more credit than it often gets. While the common narrative frames tariffs as purely protectionist, what Trump has done is shift the global conversation from a passive acceptance of asymmetrical trade deals to one where fairness, reciprocity, and strategic leverage are front and centre. That shift doesn’t just benefit the U.S.—it benefits partners like Australia too, in ways that are often overlooked.

            Let’s start with the basics: yes, under AUSFTA, many American goods enter Australia duty-free, but the picture isn’t as black-and-white as it seems. Vehicles from the U.S. still attract a 5% import duty, and if they’re priced over the luxury threshold (currently $76,950 for fuel-efficient vehicles and $71,849 for others), they’re subject to up to 33% in Luxury Car Tax—a tax that has long been criticised for being both outdated and economically distortionary. U.S.-made spirits such as bourbon face a complex cocktail of import tariffs, excise duties, and GST, often pushing the total tax burden well above 50% of the product’s retail value. Tobacco imports are even more extreme, with combined levies reaching over 70%, effectively locking U.S. producers out of the Australian market.

            From this angle, Trump’s imposition of tariffs on foreign goods—particularly from countries that maintain non-tariff barriers, currency manipulation, or state-backed subsidies—isn’t just a nationalist move. It’s a long-overdue push for reciprocal treatment. And this helps Australia in two key ways.

            First, it raises the global standard for trade negotiations. If the U.S. succeeds in securing fairer terms with trading partners—especially large economies like China, the EU, and India—it sets a precedent. It strengthens the position of smaller economies like Australia, which often lack the sheer market power to force change unilaterally. Trump’s use of tariffs in the USMCA negotiations (the NAFTA replacement) resulted in tighter rules of origin, more equitable labour provisions, and improved market access for U.S. farmers. Australia stands to gain from this precedent when negotiating our own trade deals, particularly in Asia-Pacific, where market access is often conditional and opaque.

            Second, a more balanced global trading system helps protect Australia’s competitive exporters—in sectors like agriculture, mining, education, and services. When countries like China flood global markets with state-subsidised goods, it undercuts both U.S. and Australian producers. Trump’s aggressive stance against these distortions has already led to the WTO reform debate gaining momentum, which is vital for smaller export-oriented economies like ours. Australia relies heavily on rules-based trade—we don’t have the scale to engage in trade wars, but we benefit immensely when larger players challenge those who undermine the system.

            There’s also a domestic benefit. Trump’s actions have reignited discussion in Australia around our own trade vulnerabilities—such as our dependence on a handful of markets, our exposure to supply chain shocks, and our over-reliance on foreign manufacturing. The COVID-19 pandemic exposed many of these gaps, and Trump’s America First framework has become, ironically, a blueprint for economic resilience that many in Canberra are now emulating. We’ve seen increased investment in local manufacturing, energy independence initiatives, and a broader push to diversify trade relationships—moves that align with the strategic rebalancing Trump championed.

            Finally, it’s worth noting that trade policy isn’t just about economics—it’s about sovereignty. By using tariffs as leverage, Trump has challenged the notion that free trade must always be unconditional. In doing so, he’s encouraged nations like ours to think more critically about who we trade with, under what terms, and to what end. That’s a good thing. It’s made trade a matter of national interest, not just economic theory.

            In summary, Trump’s approach to tariffs and trade policy—far from being a reckless or isolationist strategy—has forced a much-needed reset of the global trade landscape. It’s reasserted the importance of fairness, strategic independence, and reciprocal access. And for Australia, a country that thrives when global markets are stable, transparent, and rules-based, that’s not just good news—it’s a significant opportunity.

            • rooster7777 on 06/04/2025 - 19:04
              +1

              @50cent: A whole lot of words this time, but nonsense.

              Vehicles from the US- face exactly the same customs duty and gst/ luxury car tax as all other vehicles sold in the australian market. There is no protection at all for australian motor cars because australia makes no cars…. ie there is no trade barrier targetting america.

              Alcohol - all alcohol products face the same combination of taxes as applied to australian made alcohol products. … ie there is no trade barrier targetting america

              Tobacco- all alcohol products imported into australia face the same customs duty and gst…. there is no protection at all for australian products, because australia doesn't make tobacco products….. ie there is no trade barrier targetting america

              Trump's imposition of "reciprocal tariffs" is a farce. The calculations are a primary school intelligence calculation of a country's exports to the US divided by imports from the US, with a 10% jacking if that amount if negative. There is no calculation of import protections or non trade barriers. Hence the 10% import duty on australian products other than steel or aluminium… despite australia having a trade deficit with the US.

              "When countries like China flood global markets with state-subsidised goods, it undercuts both U.S. and Australian producers" it now becomes glaringly obvious you didn't write this garbage… you just hoovered it up from some propaganda site. What exactly do you think australia competes with china as an exporter?

              So much of this paste of garbage words are just that… words that have no actual meaning. No mainstream economic analysis in the world says this rubbish… I presume you got if off a maga/ trumpian website.

        • John Doh on 05/04/2025 - 07:24

          Ah now I get it. No wonder Ali express adds tax even for small orders. But iHerb does not, is it included in the RRP they display?

          • MdMa7 on 05/04/2025 - 07:38
            +3

            @John Doh: With iHerb, it's included in the price and mentions it in the cart.

        • gromit on 05/04/2025 - 07:36
          +3

          What they did was remove a tax loophole that when we didn't have online trading made sense and as much as I was pissed it was removed and still hate Gerry for his role in that it was at least a fair and understandable move. The US NEVER had such exemptions, they charge their sales tax regardless of where the goods come from at point of sale. So NO GST is not a tariff, it is a sales tax. If GST is a tariff then the US actually slap us with a 17% tariff as they have an average of 7% GST as well.

        • wtfisgoingon on 05/04/2025 - 08:14
          +12

          Let me spell this out, because people like you really don't seem to get it.

          A value added tax, like the GST, applies to everything. Applying it to imports only levels the playing field with goods that are sold domestically.

          A tariff, by its very definition, is discriminatory. It applies only to imports.

          These are therefore not even remotely the same thing.

        • garage sale on 05/04/2025 - 10:15

          the $1000 was only applied to companies they could get to collect, e.g ebay, i buy lots of things from small companies overseas and don’t pay gst if under $1000 as too expensive for govt to collect.

      • desync on 06/04/2025 - 08:21

        hurting this country how? if you were to say slightly hurting the profits of the richest people in australia exporting to USA you'd be far more on point

        you do realise that those products will now be available to australians for cheaper now as it positively impact SUPPLY

        maybe take a moment and think about the narratives you are being sold and by who

    • subywagon on 04/04/2025 - 23:38
      +2

      THAT'LL OWN THE LIBS!!!! AND QUIT WHISPEERIN LIB!!!111

    • freefall101 on 05/04/2025 - 00:00
      +17

      Wasting your money to annoy the imaginary people who will never see nor care what you do, that’s definitely the mark of sanity coming through.

    • Crispcabbage on 05/04/2025 - 01:10

      You surely live up to your name

    • Crow K on 05/04/2025 - 03:27
      +8

      the woke left would absolutely hate it if you put your tongue on a red hot stove

    • slipperypete on 05/04/2025 - 06:46
      +3

      yeah, This is actually happening. Normal middle class people are going out buying cars they don't like and collapsing stock to support a trillionaire

      Join the sheep

    • weedlord420 on 05/04/2025 - 17:17
      -1

      cringe

    • desync on 06/04/2025 - 08:11

      52 NPCs were triggered by your comment

      It's just too easy, congratulations.

  • perfectlydark on 04/04/2025 - 23:24
    +45

    havnt seen a company's reputation plummet quite as fast as this mob. they will accidently be claiming insurance on warehouses full within months at this rate

      • perfectlydark on 04/04/2025 - 23:26
        +23

        you're most welcome, hope your BDS clears up soon

    • desync on 06/04/2025 - 08:23
      -1

      teslas are actually still killing it

      there is the media and there is reality

      not really the same thing

      • perfectlydark on 06/04/2025 - 08:41
        +2

        share price halved, terrible P/E, chinese market exploding..
        mate the media you are consuming isnt reality

      • arcticmonkey on 06/04/2025 - 12:38

        Killing what? Their reputation?

  • MaxHashrate on 04/04/2025 - 23:25
    +3

    TeSSSla woooo. Having fun shorting.

    • dealhunter52 on 04/04/2025 - 23:33
      +14

      Looking forward to the earning report on 22nd April.

      • Caped Baldy on 05/04/2025 - 09:01

        Don't be surprised if it is full of fraudulent activities.

    • ozbking on 05/04/2025 - 00:06

      It’s a rollercoaster… have been buying and selling TSLZ…

  • Vorsprungdurchtech on 04/04/2025 - 23:29
    +1

    New 2025 (Blue/White Interor/NSW/Driveaway) - $63,024
    Inventory 2024 (Blue/White Interor/NSW/Driveaway) - $60,399

  • Wokstar on 04/04/2025 - 23:38
    +6

    Model Ys are looking like $4-9,000 off, not that anyone cares enough to buy one. I'd rather walk than be seen driving one.

    • michaelTito on 04/04/2025 - 23:47
      +4

      Walkstar*

    • EchoMaple91 on 05/04/2025 - 08:37
      +2

      and you’d have to be living under a rock to choose the outgoing model over the new Model Y…

      • garage sale on 05/04/2025 - 10:17

        new model is more of a reason for discount, and possible new features are a reason to may be pay for new model. with the amount of tech in these cars it’s like buying latest vs old model phone. if you have the money buy new model.

  • DonaldJTrump on 04/04/2025 - 23:44
    +10

    Me and my good friend had a good thing going, until you people voted me in.

    • seamonkey on 04/04/2025 - 23:51

      member since 2018? How the hell was your username not snapped up 2 years earlier (at least)

      • strangeloops66 on 05/04/2025 - 09:17
        +1

        Disdain?

        • seamonkey on 05/04/2025 - 10:08

          Yeah and I share that disdain but still wouldn't expect that set of circumstances.

    • Gunnar on 05/04/2025 - 08:29

      Are people who downvote this deal terrorists?

      • strangeloops66 on 05/04/2025 - 09:19

        Only if they come within 150m of a Tesla dealership carrying a fuel container.

  • ozbargainjimmy on 04/04/2025 - 23:45

    eww

    • ego22 on 05/04/2025 - 01:12

      This checks out

  • seamonkey on 04/04/2025 - 23:50
    -1

    Family member has had a terrible run with their Tesla. They regret their purchase, that's all I know.

    • ezz88 on 04/04/2025 - 23:58

      Cool story bro.

      • FabMan on 05/04/2025 - 00:19
        +3

        Often on purchases, people give feedback to their experience using it, can be helpful.

        • basketcase86 on 05/04/2025 - 01:08

          Defo more dragons needed tho. Lol

        • seamonkey on 05/04/2025 - 11:42
          -1

          Jeez didn't realise people would get so butthurt from a throw away comment. It's not fair I critique it. I'm not the owner. I hear my cousin speak of panel alignment issues, long wait times for repairs and super poor quality repairs.

          Like more than a dozen downvotes. Is it a crime to speak poorly of this particular vehicle. People are bloody ridiculous.

          • basketcase86 on 05/04/2025 - 15:10
            +1

            @seamonkey: My friend of a friends best mate that used to live down the street from his other mate said that they thought their Tesla wasn’t very good for an unknown reason. You guys should know this as it’s a good value add. lol. Crickey! Lol

          • FabMan on 05/04/2025 - 16:10

            @seamonkey: You seem a bit odd. I defended your first post as sharing your experience or knowledge on the product is good, but then you write it isn't fair your critique it, so why bother writing your initial message at all? Then you get all upset asking if it is a crime because you got a few down votes, deal with it, it happens sometimes when you speak up.

    • Omarko on 05/04/2025 - 05:58
      +3

      Pointless post unless tou provide specifics.

      I love my Tesla, amazing car.

      • taki on 05/04/2025 - 09:56
        -2

        Pointless without specifics. Why is BYD not better amazing car than Tesla?

        • garage sale on 05/04/2025 - 10:26

          i’ve sat in byd and tesla, both are EV but are targeted at different demographics, and it could be because of where the design teams are based, it’s like apple and the cupertino design team, mazda Mx5 designed in california not japan. BYD has advantage of volume and cost, and depends what your budget and life style is.

        • Omarko on 05/04/2025 - 12:17

          huh ? what are you talking about ? I never compared Tesla to BYD? come on mate, you clutching the straws here and making illogical comments.

      • seamonkey on 05/04/2025 - 11:45

        Said something above. I can't provide specifics. I've never driven one. My specifics are having a beer with my cousin who whinges about it often. And this cousin is not a whinger. So frankly that's enough to scare me off for life. That's the only review I need. I trust their opinion.

  • chan1 on 04/04/2025 - 23:52
    +3

    It’s too early to buy a Tesla now. I need to hold for a few more months.

  • rmsprs on 04/04/2025 - 23:54
    +3

    great deal! soon as you buy, you also get HUGE discounts on the depreciation!

    • dylanando on 05/04/2025 - 00:13
      +4

      most cars offer same perk.

  • iguana on 04/04/2025 - 23:54
    +3

    I wouldn't buy a Tesla, unless you want it keyed. Or worse.

    • dylanando on 05/04/2025 - 00:13
      +5

      least you can watch it back through sentry!

      • EchoMaple91 on 05/04/2025 - 08:38

        this is the way! LOL.

      • krouton24 on 05/04/2025 - 10:39

        Just on this, do Tesla owners find more Sentry alerts in recent times of people randomly messing with their cars?

        Would there be anything illegal in getting Sentry to activate and then start done some kind of childish gestures, Elon salutes etc. that would get tiresome after a while, not to mention NSFW with kids in the car.

        • dylanando on 05/04/2025 - 21:57

          I haven’t received any ‘more’
          Normally it’s kids looking into the car.

      • rooster7777 on 05/04/2025 - 01:53
        +6

        You have a very american view on what the word terrorist means…. are you american?

        • ConsumerAffairs on 05/04/2025 - 02:12
          +1

          Not an American view at all

          Dictionary
          Definitions from Oxford Languages
          ~domestic terrorist
          ~noun
          ~a person who commits terrorist acts in their own country against their fellow citizens.

          • Lt Lemming on 05/04/2025 - 02:54
            +3

            @ConsumerAffairs: Keying a car is hardly a terrorist act. It's petty vandalism at best.

          • Crow K on 05/04/2025 - 03:31
            +3

            @ConsumerAffairs: they were querying the definition of terrorist, not "domestic terrorist"

            "it's what a terrorist does, only not overseas" isn't a helpful contribution to this discussion of what a terrorist is

          • gromit on 05/04/2025 - 07:40
            +2

            @ConsumerAffairs: it is not a terrorist act at all. It is a moronic act of vandalism in the misguided view that it hurts Musk. Terrorist acts are designed to invoke fear for ideological or religious causes. These acts don't frighten people or endanger them, they do piss them off (rightly so).

Login or Join to leave a comment
Login Join