• expired

Galax GeForce RTX 5080 1-Click 16GB OC Edition GDDR7 Graphics Card $2099 Delivered ($0 VIC/ADL C&C) @ Centre Com

250

ATL at a local retailer? $80 over MSRP still - might be a deal for those looking for good RT/PT capability right now and don't feel the 5070 Ti is fast enough. Stock seems available online and at some stores. While this is an SFF compatible version, it appears to have a vapour chamber so should be cooler/quieter than the other SFF versions of the 5080.

Surcharges: 0% for bank deposit, Afterpay & Zip Money. 1.2% for VISA / MasterCard & PayPal. 2.2% for AmEx.

Free shipping excludes WA, NT & remote areas.

Related Stores

Centre Com
Centre Com

Comments

  • +44

    Shocking lol $2100. It's 10 percent faster or a few fps than the 4080 without the fake frames and the 4080 was overpriced when it came out.

    I waited and used a voucher to get the 4080 with Diablo for $1200.

    Vote with your wallet. There was an article on toms hardware nobody is buying them and they found 5080 and 90s in Walmart below cost price on sale

      • +5

        It was 13% faster than 4080S when overclocked

      • +4

        19 negs for correcting misinformation, lol.

      • Its at least 10% behind a 4090 once overclocked…also dont forget a 4090 can also be overclocked and it has 24gb vram and has been as low as $2,600 at times. Dont make excuses for this card. It should be no more than $1,800 to make any kind of sense. A 5070 ti is $1,509 and is only 15% behind in performance ( it also overclocks very well….pretty close to a stock 5080) and lets not forget the even better value which is $800 cheaper for 15-17% less performance. 5080 is just as much as a dud as the 4080 was….no one should be buying these until they drop in price. Its just embarrassing that cards that are less than half the price have tge same amount of vram lol

        • -2
          1. No, it's at 95%.

          2. The 4090 at stock uses 420-450 W, pushes 5-7% further depending on the card, and consumes 480-600 W as it does so.

          3. Duh, the 5070 Ti is a better buy, but the 5080 also has an extra decoder chip on, so it's slanted towards video editing (i.e. creators). If you think I'm suggesting the price is good, you completely missed my opening sentence (though it's $590 more, not $800).

          4. Go look at RTX kit and recognise what is happening with VRAM consumption. If you're not happy with that, wait for 3GB chips to scale so the 5080 and below don't suffer the same fate as the 5090 and get hoovered to make cheap supercomputer clusters.

          Leave it at that, please.

          • @jasswolf: You're really going to correct me like its any better? Its still almost $600 more for 15% more performance. Your mental gymnastic skills are high I'll give you that, clearly you bought a 5080 and are trying to justify it to yourself and thats fine, you do you. But its still a poor purchase either way you slice it. It needs to be closer to $1,800 to be worth looking at. Dont forger 4080 supers had been as low as $1,399 over a yeae ago. A yeae later youre paying $700 and up more just for 15% more performance…..thats embarrassing lok

            • -1

              @S1nn3r86: Ok most of your performance figures are wrong, your statement on my opinion of the card pricing and purchasing decisions are wrong, and you're clearly not even reading what I'm writing at this point, and I've already asked you to leave it be.

              Scroll down like 7 comments and see where I link data, there's plenty of other data on the internet showing what's possible with a 450MHz overclock and +4000 MT/s boost to VRAM @ 350W.

              No one likes the price, you're wrong about OC performance, VRAM budgets are going to decrease through inferenced detail and improved asset streaming over time, enough.

    • @johnnyg I agree. But my fear is that Nvidia is making so much money in other markets (Professional products, A.I. etc) that they don't really care that much if their consumer GPU's drop off in sales, because it seems they just want to artificially inflate prices permanently.

      • +1

        Send a message by supporting their competitors. At this point i’m switching over to AMD. I shouldn’t need a 750w PSU to run a damn gpu alone

    • +3

      Having owned both a 4080 and a 5080 i can assure you the 5080 is more than 10% increase

    • +5

      While the MSRP and pricing is disappointing, I'm posting this again for visibility, with sources:

      No, it was 13% more than the 4080 Super at stock, at launch.

      1.13 x 1.12 = +26% when conservatively overclocked @ 350W (default) power draw, or 95.5% of the performance of a 4090.

      Now there's further boosts and savings.

    • +4

      would you like a pc to go with your GPU?

      No, OK the total is $2099.00 thanks

    • +1

      I assume you mean this article: https://www.tomshardware.com/pc-components/gpus/rtx-50-serie…

      The article does not say "nobody is buying them" but that returned items had been found below the original sticker price (sticker price and RRP may not be the same) but that such scores are rare and you are lucky if you find one. Since these are returned items that means they are used and no longer carry the store warranty so has increased risk for the buyer. To say that the 5080 is unpopular based on this article certainly takes some mental gymnastics.

  • +5

    Did they purposely make it look so cheesey

  • +9

    16GB

    • +24

      for $2k i'd expect a bit more than 16gb tbh

      • +7

        Exactly! This is why the 9070XT was a no brainer at 1139 for me. I just couldn't justify the price difference for a card that will probably be obsolete about the same time.

        • which 9070xt card did you get for 1139?

        • -2

          9070xt shows its weakness at 4k or with RT.
          Best value for money 1440p card on the market though.

          • @Bruceflix: It really depends on the game at this point… I have played multiple games at a very decent frame rate in 4K, 100-130fps is where it will live in most games. Sure, very demanding games will see it drop to 80-90 or maybe cyberpunk in the high 60s, low 70s. Again, all very playable. And it can all be increased by reducing details if you're picky about your fps.

          • @Bruceflix: Lol what? I get over 80fps in cyberpunk at 4k with fsr 4 on balance, high settings and RT reflections on and it looks and plays very well. No problems playing at 4k with fsr 4

      • +1

        hopefully a mid-gen refresh with 24gb model
        something should cover the gap between 16GB and 32GB models
        especially since they stopped production of the 4090

        • +5

          Probably for $2800 or something stupid

          • @DeToxin: One can hope (in vain?) they release it with price drop or similar to 4080S. That’s probs only if the 5080 vanilla doesn’t sell well like the 4080. But yeh, probs more likely a price bump instead coz if it might actually beat a 4090

            • +1

              @gazer: They dont appear to be selling, we're not getting much stock in and there's still plenty available because of the terrible pricing. I wouldn't hold out much hope for a super version with 24gb for the same price though. If they're going to do a 24gb card it will probably be a 5080 ti on a cut down gb202 die and cost more lol

              • @S1nn3r86: Almost like if doesn’t cost more than regular lowest 4090 price (2600 or so), and at least matches performance, then kinda somewhat palatable?!? But thena gain Nvidia is just shifting price goal posts up and up….and objectively not that reasonable….

                • @gazer: A super variant would just be a vram increase and probably for the same price. Gb203 is already pushed to its limit. If theyre going to do a 5080 ti it would have to a cut down gb202 die….i dont think it will be under $2,600. Lucky if its under $3,000 lol but it would surely have to beat the 4090. It would be embarrassing if it didnt lol. A 5080 can get within 10% of the 4090 with an OC but its gimped with 16gb….far too little for a card over $2,000 lol

  • +5

    I really dislike the use of the word SFF for a card so big and chunky(I define SFF as sub 10 litre cases, obviously it's subjective, I'm using a 4.9 litre case!). INNO3D are the only ones making an actual small card with their 250x116x41 design, compared to this 5080 at 315x140x49. It's a big difference! 2 slot, dual fan cards are almost extinct. inno3d have the other actual SFF GPU with the 4070 ti super, which is still the SFF king!

    They have a 5080 laptop GPU, a 2 slot dual fan 5080 should be possible with some minor power limits, or just fans spinning at 6000 rpm

    • Yeah that Inno card is great, though it'd be pretty toasty in an SFF case that small no?

      • +1

        I have the 5070 inno3d 2 slot card, with a decent undervolt, I'm playing KCD2 and it barely goes above 60 c. It's loud, that's just a con with a 2 slot card.

    • Yeah SFF has been derailed as meaning Substantial Form Factor. I have a dan a4-sfx, ghost s1, and an ssupd meshlicious and the latter i classify as barely SFF

  • +1

    This is the ugliest gpu I've ever seen in my life.

    • There are definitely way more ugly RTX 50 series than I've seen since before GTX 10 series, and at the highest prices since forever

    • Meh. Be tucked away in an ITX build. But fair play

  • +5

    So glad I picked up my 4080 Super while the announcement for this pieces of crap was being made.

    • +1

      Well played. Risky at the time but it paid off.

  • +2

    Nvidia has the most ridiculous pricing in tech companies all time. It’s not I like AMD and Intel, but I hope they can catch up.

    • +12

      No company is your friend. In tech or otherwise. They only give you benefits (better products at better prices) to win your business when they're not already on top.

      Once they're on top they'll take you for everything they can. We need competition.

      AMD was struggling, then knocked it out of the park, now look at what they've become. Canva does a rug pull on their small business plan, etc.

    • +4

      FWIW,

      AMD's 9070 xt costs about 38% less to make than the 7900 xt, but they're priced about the same to the consumer.

      Or, it costs about the same to manufacture as the 7900 GRE, but priced about AUD$200 higher.

      And according to earnings reports, they were already making healthy margins on the previous generation. Make of that what you will.

      • +3

        I'm hoping they bring in a lot of price cuts as time goes on. They had very healthy levels of stock but a 9070 XT at RRP still sells out immediately. But if you're prepared to pay $100 more, there's tonnes of stock.

        It seems like they've gone too far on pricing this time. There were rumours that the 5060ti was a paper launch with basically no stock, and yet they didn't sell out. We're less than 3 months after launch of all this generation and there is stock everywhere of every GPU, because the prices are ridiculous.

        • +4

          Totally agree. I'd be more than happy to pay fair prices relative to a reasonable level of performance increase over time, regardless of which company it is. I'm just so tired of ozbargain acting like AMD is their friend running a charity selling GPUs at a loss to "stick it" to the big bad green villain.

          • +1

            @xrailgun: I feel like, at this point, the only “good guy” GPU manufacturer will end up being a Chinese company.
            Especially as America is going down the shitter.

      • BoM accounts for less when they're tasking supercomputers and a bunch of extra employees to write software for all of this.

  • +4

    Buy a 5070. It is as fast as a 4090, says Nvidia. 5080 is only a bit faster than the 4080, so the 5070 is faster than 5080, right?

  • -6

    barely runs games from 2011. Hard pass

  • +3

    Galax needs to hire better designers.

  • +1

    wow $2100 for a GPU alone, years ago I built a whole kickass PC with that money, just insane. I always blame consumers, not NVIDIA.

    • +1

      Everyone's been conditioned to believe that RT is the way forward.

      • +1

        so ray tracing costs two thousand dollars?

    • it's the apple way

  • +2

    What a piece of junk

  • Nice! Just bought 5 such a great deal, 2k for a piece of junk…

  • +1

    The RTX 5080 is the new RTX 4070 lmfao. Every generation, we're regressing even more it seems.

  • +1

    Did they fix the melting cables with these?

  • +1

    wow wow wee wow $2,000 plus for a graphics card daymnnnnnnnnnnnn…..the most i have ever spent is $400 and that was a lot of money!

  • +2

    I remember when VooDoo 2 was the ultimate!!!!!

    • +1

      LOAD "*" ,8,1
      VooDoo 2 was the shit in the day, loved DethKarz and Incubation: Time is running out

      • +3

        you were playing the wrong games….it was all about quake and half life!

        • they were great too, i bought half life home on around 50ish floppy disks from uni, had to re-do a few that failed

  • Back in 2005 a high end Nvidia card like the GeForce 7800 GT launched at around $600 AUD.
    If you adjust for inflation then 20 years later it's just over $1,000.
    Then you just gotta add the $1,000+ Nvidia tax and there you have it, proof the RTX 5080 is a gen-u-ine bargain!

  • +1

    Crazy pricing, pays to be a patient gamer. You can get a mid-range GPU and games for much cheaper. Game Pass if you have a must play and even then you don't need the latest card to enjoy it.

  • Well, ppl still buying them. Pretty much all gone. Consumer power eh

  • +1

    not ebough VRAM for a $2k card,

  • +3

    We need China to make competitive graphic cards, its the only way the prices will come down

  • Still comes with the NVIDIA Fire Port

  • Should be at least 24GB RAM. We're robbed.

    • +1

      Only if you buy one

  • +1

    This is a terrible price imo. They need to be closer to $1,800 to even be worth looking at. 5070 ti can be had for $1,509 right this minute, its only about 15-17% behind in performance much cheaper. The only way the 5080 makes sense is if its $200 below rrp. Dont forget the 4080 super was $1,879 and they are both $1,000 usd cards. Our dollar isnt that much worse then when that card came out. We're getting ripped off. The 4080 super was also regularly under $1,600 on sales, i see no reason not wait a little longer for some decent sales. Theyre still not even at rrp yet ! What a joke lol

Login or Join to leave a comment