This was posted 10 years 29 days ago, and might be an out-dated deal.

Related
  • expired

$4.85 - a roll of Agfa 35mm Film 36 Exposure 200 ISO Colour Neg - pick up in Melb or $7.85 post

720
$4.85 - a roll of Agfa 35mm Film 36 Exposure 200 ISO Colour Neg - pick up in Melb or $7.85 post
Go to Deal
Store RepFilmNeverDie on 04/04/2014 - 13:45 filmneverdie.com.au (493 clicks)
Last edited 11/04/2014 - 14:10

Sales Extended for 2 more WEEK!! Supplier say they can do this deal a bit longer :D

To Continue the Celebration of Our FilmNeverDie Gallery re-opening @ 367 Mile Lane, Parkville, Vic, we bring you

$4.85 - a roll of New Agfa 35mm Film 36 Exposure 200 Iso Colour Neg - Fresh, Expire in Nov 2015

You can come pick up at the Gallery or pay $7.85 ( up to 10 rolls) for Australia Wide postage.

Affordable Negative film with some subdued in colour but in a good way, noticeable grain but generally a good all rounder film. Slightly more skewed towards warmer colours, but definitely great results for 4 x 6 prints and a not too bad on 8 x 12 prints.

Sensitivity and Film Sizes ISO : 200 Film Sizes : 135 , 36 exp.

we also have
$5.00 - a roll for the Agfa 35mm 400 iso film

GST inclusive! :D

Any issues let me know

Help spread the words for us:

facebook.com/FilmNeverDie
twitter.com/FilmNeverDie_

cheers
Gary
+61433 535 227
FilmNeverDie.com

Other 35mm Agfa Analog Camera Film

Related Stores

Film Never Die
Film Never Die

closed Comments

      • Store RepFilmNeverDie @ Film Never Die on 04/04/2014 - 17:20

        Expired in Sept 2017 , I double checked

    • Store RepFilmNeverDie @ Film Never Die on 04/04/2014 - 17:33
      +2

      Cheaper than $4.85 including GST?

      • hoxygt on 04/04/2014 - 17:37

        Do you sums store rep 3 rolls for $15!!! God some people……oh wait

        • Store RepFilmNeverDie @ Film Never Die on 04/04/2014 - 17:42
          +1

          Sorry I should have been clearer, I was asking if the state of SA the Presence store in Adelaide Arcade and King William Road sell their film for less than $4.85 a roll ?

          Also 3 rolls from us is only $14.50 compared to Lomography shop $15.

        • YellowKnight on 04/04/2014 - 17:55

          $4.85 per roll but no mention anywhere in the title or the body of a delivery fee?

          When I went to finalize the order there was a $7 delivery fee.

        • Store RepFilmNeverDie @ Film Never Die on 04/04/2014 - 18:19

          You can come pick up at our FilmNeverDie Gallery 367 Mile Lane for that price! We are open 11-6 Tuesday to Friday and 11-3 pm on Saturday ! :D

        • Store RepFilmNeverDie @ Film Never Die on 04/04/2014 - 18:24

          Fixed it now, I am sorry! Yup pick up for that price or $7.50 delivery Australia Wide.

        • hoxygt on 04/04/2014 - 18:32
          +1

          My post was tongue in cheek store rep, plus the product isn't even the same….

        • hoxygt on 04/04/2014 - 18:34

          You mean they want money for delivery??? - report them to consumer affairs immediately…

    • tohara on 04/04/2014 - 18:33

      lomo is absolute crap. It's like comparing apples and oranges

  • abacus on 04/04/2014 - 17:29
    +2

    I have about 30 rolls that expired 5 years ago, any suggestions what to do with them. Don't have the heart to throw out.

    • YellowKnight on 04/04/2014 - 17:30
      -2

      If you're in SA donate them to me.

    • Store RepFilmNeverDie @ Film Never Die on 04/04/2014 - 17:37

      What films are they? We can help you sell them if you want :D we do sell vintage used cameras on consignment too.

      • tohara on 04/04/2014 - 21:37

        ill sell you my neopan 1600 for $100 :P

        • Store RepFilmNeverDie @ Film Never Die on 04/04/2014 - 21:42

          LOL

        • tohara on 05/04/2014 - 11:34

          i bet you don't have any of that!

        • Store RepFilmNeverDie @ Film Never Die on 05/04/2014 - 12:01

          ya no neopan 1600, you are right, but we do have Ilford 3200 iso haha

      • abacus on 06/04/2014 - 02:08
        +1

        Have to find them first. Rolls of Agfa 35mm Film 36 Exposure 400 ISO Colour Neg, the el cheapo version.

  • fonsii on 04/04/2014 - 17:29

    selling any FP-3000B?

  • Fobsessive on 04/04/2014 - 17:42
    +7

    The rep is awesome and hilarious! Old school's the best.
    Film is great - it's still the best for movies today.

    • eug on 04/04/2014 - 23:19

      The rep shot my friend's wedding. He's awesome in person too. Hi, Gary… nice to see you here!

      • Store RepFilmNeverDie @ Film Never Die on 05/04/2014 - 12:03

        Haha Thanks Eug! Thanks for the support! if anyone want wedding done, Check out www.Aweiding.com my wife shot those. Mainly on digital but she will incorporate about 16 shots of Polaroid too.

  • [Deactivated] on 04/04/2014 - 17:56

    What about 120 film?

    • Store RepFilmNeverDie @ Film Never Die on 04/04/2014 - 19:23

      You mean promo for 120 films? we don't have any at the moment but we will continue to work to get some good supply in, what 120 do you normally shoot?

      • [Deactivated] on 04/04/2014 - 20:25

        Fuji 400H or Hp5

        • Store RepFilmNeverDie @ Film Never Die on 04/04/2014 - 21:49

          HP5 is still quite affordable about $9-10 a roll, Fuji 400H will be around $15, do you have a website where you put your work we can follow / share?

  • Lancerx on 04/04/2014 - 18:22

    WOW..this thing must have come back from time travel..

    • Store RepFilmNeverDie @ Film Never Die on 04/04/2014 - 21:52

      Yeah we use the latest time machine from Google :D

      OK , Time!

  • [Deactivated] on 04/04/2014 - 19:12

    I looked in the site but don't see medium format 120 film

  • quarrymaster on 04/04/2014 - 19:38

    Hey Rep, any reason why you didn't choose Film Never Dies with an "S" at the end?

    • Store RepFilmNeverDie @ Film Never Die on 04/04/2014 - 21:50
      +1

      Yup that's a good question, real answer is I got too excited and register the domain and started the business, the cover up answer is it looks 'Cleaner' ;)

      • quarrymaster on 04/04/2014 - 21:52

        Just sounds grating every time I read it. Imagine it was loveneverdie.com. Anyway, all the best.

        • Store RepFilmNeverDie @ Film Never Die on 04/04/2014 - 22:02

          haha thanks for the wishes! :D

  • Jimothy Wongingtons on 04/04/2014 - 20:12

    Hey Rep, any chance of a deal on fp100 any time soon?

    • Store RepFilmNeverDie @ Film Never Die on 04/04/2014 - 21:51

      What sort of prices will entice you to get more?

      • Jimothy Wongingtons on 04/04/2014 - 22:08

        I'm looking to grab 8 packs of fp100 and 2 packs fp3000 via B+H… I assume you can't get anywhere near those prices. :(

  • grasstown on 04/04/2014 - 20:37

    Makes me happy for film to survive

    • Store RepFilmNeverDie @ Film Never Die on 04/04/2014 - 21:52

      Haha! thanks, we are quite happy too that we got so many + votes, beyond my wildest dream that my post will go no.1 on OZB for about an hour ! hahahah

  • Perete on 04/04/2014 - 22:49

    I wish you guys had a Sydney branch and have the Efiniti UXI Super film! I had to order off eBay and it will take a month for them to arrive from HK. I just recently got hooked into film because of that unique look digital will probably never get ever. It makes you really think about composition and proper exposure before taking a shot and that makes you appreciate film even more. Hell, even the bad shots are keepers for me :)

    • Store RepFilmNeverDie @ Film Never Die on 07/04/2014 - 10:49

      Efinity UXI Super Film, we will look into that!

  • [Deactivated] on 05/04/2014 - 00:02
    +3

    I didn't think I've ever seen a post about film here and I really enjoyed the read. Great replies rep, I just had to log in to +1 your post. I love the anticipation of waiting to see the photos, you just don't get that with digital. Plus it always amusing to see people looking rather confused by an old SLR :P

    • Store RepFilmNeverDie @ Film Never Die on 07/04/2014 - 10:50

      haha where to slot in the SD card they asked?

  • Polde on 05/04/2014 - 01:40
    +2

    Just like to say also its been great reading the OP's replies, great stuff. I remember developing film back in high-school when the rise of digital was just coming around and being excited upon seeing my photos develop in the liquid.

  • cheng2008 on 07/04/2014 - 03:09
    +1

    Would love to shoot film, but digital is just too easy to use, and VSCO Film pretty much gets my photos all of the way to "the film look." FF DSLR + VSCO film = unbeatable combo for convenience vs the film look.

    • slowmo on 07/04/2014 - 09:47
      +1

      the reason why I love flim is because you put more thoughts into composing that shot. Nowadays I see too many people doing the '1 out of million' shots thing (shoot 1 million times and hope 1 turns out alright).

      • eug on 07/04/2014 - 10:06
        +1

        In many situations, like when photographing an event, if you don't keep snapping, you're going to miss a lot of good moments.

        • Store RepFilmNeverDie @ Film Never Die on 07/04/2014 - 12:50

          Eug, are you Kai's friend? i am still trying to work out which Eug you are haha.

        • eug on 07/04/2014 - 13:04
          +1

          Yup that's the right one!

      • retiredfeline on 07/04/2014 - 13:24
        +1

        When I look at my holiday slides from umpteen years ago, I bemoan how few there were. 6 weeks in Europe and all I had to show for it were 5 boxes of 38 slides (yes, I squeezed a couple more from the roll with care). So many sights I only took one shot of. Of course the facts that a roll cost about $30-40 processed and the bulk in the backpack might have had something to do with it.

        Yeah, film's fine when you want to be artistic in your home city, but no way I'm going back to it for travel photography.

        • slowmo on 07/04/2014 - 14:14
          +1

          I don't know about you, but I never regarded travel photography seriously nowadays with the amount of 'holding up the leaning tower' (this is just one example) poses by people with the boom of digital cameras.

          sure, a couple of photos to commemorate the experience of travel, but doing hundreds of shots overseas? I would start to wonder, is this the experience i want out of travelling? forever looking into that view finder (or smartphone)?

          how about people taking photos of food? i could go on…

          like i said, film forces you to be prudent with your shots… digital just encourages waste.

          maybe it's time people put their 'tech' away and really enjoy what they are there for.

        • eug on 07/04/2014 - 14:30
          +1

          maybe it's time people put their 'tech' away and really enjoy what they are there for.

          Then in 20 years, only remember bits and pieces of it?

          Have only a few photos to share your life stories with your children?

          Be unable to share experiences with other friends who also want to do the same trip soon?

          digital just encourages waste.

          Fortunately, memory card bits and bytes are recyclable. :)

          I started with film but learning was a very expensive process. I'm a hands-on person so I learned more by playing with manual settings on my digital camera than I did with film. Perhaps someone with lots of patience (and money!) wouldn't have any problem with that.

          Imagine if you were getting a driving licence and it costs $500 each time you want to practice driving. It would take you a loooong time to learn how to drive.

          Now imagine if it cost only one upfront fee of $500 and you could practice 24/7 if you wanted to. You'd pick up the skills much more quickly.

          I think film is great for slower-paced artistic shooting, but there definitely are many situations where digital is more sensible.

        • slowmo on 07/04/2014 - 16:18
          +1

          heavens forbid that I am ever going to let my kids sit through hours long of slideshows about places I've been.

          I don't know about you, I go to holidays for relaxing and not to make an amateur documentary about the place.

          That is the whole problem! Why does everyone with an entry level digital camera starts to think they are the next national geographic/lonely planet sensation?

          If you think an event is -that- important, then get someone who is skilled and equipped to do the job.

          what's this nonsense about memory bytes being recyclable?

          driving is a poor example (and irrelevant), maybe you should compare it to piano lessons.

          I would leave it at that, since it seems we will never agree on this.

        • eug on 07/04/2014 - 19:01

          heavens forbid that I am ever going to let my kids sit through hours long of slideshows about places I've been.

          That's what I thought at first too. But as my parents get older, I find that I want to know more about their lives. I went searching for their slides and photos myself, trying to digitize them before they degrade.

          don't know about you, I go to holidays for relaxing and not to make an amateur documentary about the place.

          Ahh you see, that's where different people are different. I can definitely understand people who go on holidays to relax by not taking photos. Not everyone finds photography relaxing.

          But there are also people out there who treat photography as their hobby - THAT is how they relax.

          If you see an Aussie sitting at a coffeeshop in Paris reading a book, do you say to them "Why are you reading a book? Why aren't you relaxing instead? You've travelled all the way here! Go out and look at things!"

          You wouldn't, because you'd guess that reading a book is how they relax and unwind.

          Some people who have photography as a hobby, relax and unwind by taking photos.

          If you think an event is -that- important, then get someone who is skilled and equipped to do the job.

          If you don't think holidays are worth remembering, that's your decision. Nothing wrong with that. Just keep in mind that other people who might have saved for 4 years to go on that overseas holiday might want to remember more of their holiday than you.

          I would leave it at that, since it seems we will never agree on this.

          Sure. The difference is you only see it your way and your way only, ignoring the fact that there are many different types of people in this world.

        • heathwithnoteeth on 07/04/2014 - 19:19
          +1

          i agree with you eug… I dont understand some peoples idea of relaxing, but each to there own. My sister inlaw and wifey went on a holiday together, and all sister inlaw wanted to do was stay in the hotel room and read or watch dvd's… I would go mad doing that. I need to cram as much into a short time as possible, and take lots of photos as in the blur of excitement, I forget quickly and need to keep momentos of the moment to reflect on later.

        • retiredfeline on 07/04/2014 - 19:36

          Maybe you go to the stereotypical attractions. But I have shots that are uniquely of my trip. Don't forget that people and events in other countries, while not typical guidebook pictures are also fascinating. And no, I don't take selfies or even ask people to take pictures of me. So there.

        • Store RepFilmNeverDie @ Film Never Die on 08/04/2014 - 10:00
          +2

          There validity for both using digital and film, while film will very unlikely to replace digital in the mainstream in the future, but using film is definitely a very different approach.

          For discuss sake, let's say we are going for a 10 day vacation to Europe or Japan, you don't have a camera to start, would you go buy digital camera or a film camera? Are you going to spend $1000 to get a decent DSLR gear with some kit lens or spend $300 to get a film 70-80s leather and chrome SLR with a 50mm f1.4?

          Yes we will need to factored the film cost, say 10 rolls of films 36 exposures? Developing and scanning $25 a roll,for $250? total film cost $550?

          Bear in mind though, the DSLR gear will probably be about $500 in 3 years however your film SLR will still be around $300 in 3 years, yes there will be on going cost of films, but the value of the camera will hold up better and even as display unit at home.

          Then to the vacation part, personally, I think shooting over a few thousands photos on a 10 days vacation is a overkilled. I mean at the end of the day you don't need more 15-20 photos to portrait the vibe, the fun and the highlights of your trip. When was the last time a mate of yours sit in-front of your laptop with you going through the 500 pictures you took during a holiday trip?

          Even when I browse my friends' vacation photos on Facebook, I don't go to further than the 30th photos. But at the end of the day what gear to choose and what method of vacation you want is your choice. Some prefer a relaxing coffee and book read in a coffee shop in Paris, while some likes to see every corner of Paris and experiences the Vibe.

          But my point is at long as there is an option to do either, or and maybe both, and at FilmNeverDie.com you get the option to go film and we will guide you through the process. We do quarterly Polaroid / Film Walk, but to be honest if you use digital come along too, we don't discriminate :D At the end is about the shooting fun.

        • retiredfeline on 08/04/2014 - 10:18
          +2

          You do not buy a new DSLR for every trip. A DSLR lasts for years.

          You do not need a DSLR to get good pictures. I use a prosumer, and the quality is very good. Super zoom too. Cost under $300.

          Nobody is suggesting you have to take thousands of pictures per trip. However 50-100 per day is not unusual for me. Not just of the tourist sights but of people and events. If on film that adds up to a lot of bulk in your luggage, worries about X-ray machines, etc. You say don't take so many pictures, make each shot count. Why try so hard to make a virtue of a limitation?

          Digital cameras can also double as video cams these days. Try that with film.

          You don't have to post every photo on your blog. You can choose the best. I just leave the poorer shots where they are on the disk. You can even check on the spot if you need to reshoot a shot. With film you are never quite sure if you really got that shot until it's developed.

          Stories about people obsessed with shooting pictures all the time and not relaxing are caricatures. In real-life taking pictures is only a tiny fraction of the holiday time. And it's also enjoyable being on the spot and finding the best view and framing it properly. You'd do the same with a film camera too.

          Even if I went with film I'd have to scan it back home to have a digital copy to send to friends. More time and hassle.

          Sorry, but as far as travel is concerned, film is not viable for me and hasn't been for over a decade. When digital reached 5mp resolution, it was good enough for me.

        • eug on 08/04/2014 - 10:30
          +1

          Costs concerns aside, there are just different kinds of people around. Film won't suit me for travel, but I'm sure it'll suit some others perfectly well.

          At least now there's an easy way to buy film!

        • Store RepFilmNeverDie @ Film Never Die on 08/04/2014 - 23:44

          yup the video argument win it haha

          but you should come check out some slides we shot on a medium format camera, it's really quite mind blowing.

          Just so you know our gallery are wide open Tuesday - Friday 11-6 pm and Saturday 11-3pm.

          All are invited :D

Login or Join to leave a comment
Login Join