This was posted 7 years 8 months 20 days ago, and might be an out-dated deal.

Related
  • expired

Bose Headphone Wireless QC35 $424.15 at Myer in Store

700
Bose Headphone Wireless QC35 $424.15 at Myer in Store
Go to Deal
Cashback
Izzyhop on 31/07/2016 - 16:01 myer.com.au (3783 clicks)
Last edited 31/07/2016 - 20:45 by 1 other user

Bose QC35 wireless headphones $424.15 in Myer in store with trade in offer. The review for these headphones is pretty good, "The best overall active noise-canceling wireless headphone to date"

Originally posted by jbuttnz, the offer for 15% off all Bose headphones/ earphones still on at Myer in store, just take in some old headphones/ earphones for 15% off.

Was returning some faulty headphones today for a new set of the same model, but was offered a full refund or credit towards another pair, decided to go with the new QC35 wireless headphones, and without asking I was offered 15% off for returning the original headphones, saved $75 so I was very happy. Asked about the offer and any crappy headphones, earphones, in-ear etc. will be enough to get the discount, they throw them straight in the bin.

Other models also available;

  • QC35 $424
  • QC25 $339
  • QC20 $339
  • SoundLink around-ear wireless II $322
  • SoundLink on-air wireless $296
  • SoundTrue around-ear $211
  • Soundsport wireless in-ear $211
Electrical & Electronics Bluetooth Headset Bose Headphones

Related Stores

MYER
MYER

closed Comments

    • KOBH on 31/07/2016 - 17:14
      +6

      Which headphones are worth the price?

      • cDNA on 31/07/2016 - 17:39
        -6

        Audiophile headphones.

        Bose have been lacking in many departments, but the average user won't really notice a difference.

        • KOBH on 31/07/2016 - 17:42
          +31

          But people are buying the QC35 are not for sound, they buy it because of the comfort and superior ANC.

        • cDNA on 31/07/2016 - 18:29
          +1

          @PW:

          That's true.

        • Diji1 on 31/07/2016 - 19:45
          +1

          Do you think that's because audiophiles have better hearing or because you think they practice listening and so they hear more?

        • boredofficeworker on 31/07/2016 - 21:01
          +7

          @PW: I have audiophile grade headphones (Fostex TH-X00) and I definitely consider the Bose worth the price (If you plan to use them for the purpose they were designed). Obviously I wouldn't use these at home, but after spending over 45 hours on planes, and another 25 hours or so on trains during my trip to Europe this month, these really improved the quality of travel for me immeasurably. They are right up there with my camera for essential travel gear.

        • unifex on 31/07/2016 - 21:05

          So what you are saying is that there is no difference in audio and only people who have some bias can imagine a difference then post agonising posts about how the brand is crap.

        • unifex on 31/07/2016 - 21:08

          @PW:

          Personally I have been using Bose quiet comforts for years and love the sounds and the audio cancellation.

        • jaygee on 31/07/2016 - 21:48

          @PW:

          I have a B&O headphones, and I can admit that the comfort on the Bose far exceed my H6 ones. Sound wise though - it's hard to compare since they focus in different directions.

        • [Deactivated] on 01/08/2016 - 00:51

          @PW: they are buying it for sound or else who would pay 400 for 'anc' and comfort from a piece of plastic

    • JamesBingo on 31/07/2016 - 17:31
      -3

      Maybe Time For A Hearing Check?

      Well Worth It.

      Have Tried Cheap Bauhn From ALDI, Sennheiser, Sony & They All Fall Short.

      $425 Par Price, $500 Maybe An Ask.

      • KOBH on 31/07/2016 - 17:39
        +2

        I think the Sennheiser Momentum 2.0 Wireless Over-Ear Headphones have better sound quality, but not as comfort as QC35. I thought about buying the Sennheiser 2.0 heaphones before I bought the QC35 for $399.

        http://www.harveynorman.com.au/headphones-audio-music/headph…

        • BargainKen on 01/08/2016 - 13:06

          You do realise these cans are worth $799 RRP right? Can be had for ~630 on ebay but still, I'd expect them to sound better for the price. ANC on those arent as great either, the new PXC 550 seem to close the GAP in ANC and from reviews read, SQ is around halfway between the QC35s and M2AEBTs.
          The Sony's are price-matched to the Q35s but I wont spend that sort of coin without being able to test them, only place I could Im not sure the ANC was even working? SQ was better but it did distort which I never got with the QCs so I settled on those. Really a shame Sony doesnt have them available as demonstrators in sydney anywhere - The Sony store in the city has also shut down.

        • elektron on 01/08/2016 - 14:56

          @BargainKen: I saw the Sony's at JB Hi-Fi, but only the passive non-wireless unit was available for a demo, which is a different beast. Demos for most other models were available, so I think if you asked nicely they may be able to arrange for a demo unit for you.

          Someone who has compared no less then 100 bluetooth headphones has said that the Sony h.ear on wireless and the MDR-1ABT are some of the best bluetooth headphones in the world today. The two are quite different beasts, the 1ABT has a different sound signature, no ANC, touch controls and less attractive styling.

          I'm very happy with my 1ABT but ANC is not important to me.

        • BargainKen on 01/08/2016 - 17:48

          @elektron: yeh JBs setup sucks, I see the 100ABNs on sale everywhere but nowhere to test. It's a bit rich to expect someone to fork ou$499 for a set of cans without trying. The Bose on the other hand are setup everywhere and you can pair with your own device to compare which at least give your joe average a chance to try them out.

          I'm Hoping to try a few different pairs at frys and BB in the states when I go this week to see how they stack up, if they're all that much better shouldn't have much trouble flogging off the Bose but given I'm no audiophile they sound fine to me.

        • elektron on 01/08/2016 - 18:46

          @BargainKen:

          The truth is that none of them sound horrible in this price range as they all at least "sound fine". If you don't consider yourself an audiophile and happy with sound quality from the Bose, why second guess yourself and spend a lot of time and extra money for little gain?

        • BargainKen on 01/08/2016 - 21:11

          @elektron: I guesslike any punter, would like to try a variety of ANC cans at this pricepoint and get a field for the competition rather then just skull the koolaid and jump on the hype train :)
          Still interested in this format (BT, ANC). APT formats sounds good to have but I dont have any media recorded in uncompressed or high bitrates - still would be nice if bose included it (even if it makes little difference in most scenarios)

        • elektron on 02/08/2016 - 15:42

          @BargainKen: It's called upgraditis and not just audiophiles suffer from it :)

      • cDNA on 31/07/2016 - 17:40
        +2

        Bose have never made headphones that were worth the price. They'll never get the audiophile seal of approval, because of a host of reasons with their drivers.

        • KOBH on 31/07/2016 - 17:44
          +3

          To be honest, the Bose QC35 headphones I bought are well worth the price.

        • cDNA on 31/07/2016 - 18:30

          @PW:

          If you buy it for the right reasons, then I guess it's worth it.
          I'm not someone who cares for noise cancelling, which is probably why I have little interest in them.

          It's all about the sound for me.

        • elektron on 01/08/2016 - 10:28

          @PW: What other headphones in this price range have you compared them with?

        • elektron on 01/08/2016 - 10:47

          @cDNA: Looks like you got negged by a Bose fanboy for not even a criticism but a balanced and reasonable statement. It's human psychology to not want to believe that you got anything but the best for your $425.

          It doesn't change the fact that Bose headphones are marketed at people who value ANC over sound quality. For example, Sony h.ear on wireless provide 90% of the Bose QC35's ANC and about 125% of its sound quality. Not to mention that the Sony's support wireless hi-res audio (with a compatible device) and Bose can't even reproduce CD-quality sound.

          I would challenge anyone who thinks that Bose QC35 have fantastic sound quality to do a blind test against other bluetooth noise cancelling headphones such as Sony h.ear on wireless, Sony MDR-1ABT, Sennheiser Momentum 2.0 Wireless, Bang & Olufsen H7 and Definitive Technology Symphony 1.

        • kwchaz on 01/08/2016 - 11:09
          +1

          @elektron:
          You almost made me reconsider my purchase but then I realised I didn't spend $425 for my set of QC35s. :P

          Certainly, in the $500 range, I would have picked Sony myself. They do some REALLY nice bluetooth headsets.

        • elektron on 01/08/2016 - 15:00

          @kwchaz: I also didn't pay $500 for my MDR-1ABT last year but they don't have ANC, which wasn't a big deal for me.

        • kwchaz on 01/08/2016 - 15:11

          @elektron:

          How much did they cost you? :)
          I'm hoping to combine my current ANC7Bs and my bluetooth sony headset, hence why I wanted ANC.

        • Cyphar on 01/08/2016 - 16:07

          I can understand your comment for purely musical sense. However for me, I take benefit in them as a practical tool. They block out the sound of the data centres I work in and they reduce my anxiety when I fly (And I fly very often). For that, $400 is worth it. I'm still on my QC15's, 2 models down, but when they break and I have to make the purchase, they will be of extreme benefit to me and the cost is justifiable.

          If I was an audiophile, however, I certainly would never buy them

        • elektron on 01/08/2016 - 16:53

          @Cyphar: This goes back to my point of this being a good buy if you want the best noise cancellation money can buy over sound quality. Therefore you actually sound like a perfectly rational person unlike some on here who neg anyone who dares say that the Bose aren't the best sounding cans for the money.

    • mustang on 31/07/2016 - 18:32
      +2

      Sound quality wise, it is not as good as similarly priced 'higher-end' open headphones like the Senn HD600/650, AKG Q701s, etc but Bose have improved a lot with this one. I enjoyed listening to it and felt it has reached the 'golden' standard where vocals are clear (no more veiled highs, horay!) and everywhere else in the spectrum is tight and controlled. Also, not to mention its class leading noise cancellation perfect for travel/commuting.

      Ps. I chose this over the Sennheiser Momentums - far better comfort, unmatched NC and sound quality is competitive.

      • I used to be a headphone reviewer - OEM prototypes, Sony, Westone, Earsonics, Sennheiser, Beyerdynamic, Shure, etc. Now I am not too fussed about heaven-like quality as long as it's enjoyable enough to listen to.
    • 18 on 31/07/2016 - 18:48
      +1

      You're worth more than that. You're deserve way more!

  • nightelves on 31/07/2016 - 16:15
    +1

    Wait for the QC30 in September.

      • Nousernamehere on 31/07/2016 - 16:27
        +5

        Err yes they are.

      • disrupt3r on 31/07/2016 - 16:28
        +6

        qc stands for QuietComfort, which are Noise Cancelling

      • nexus4 on 31/07/2016 - 16:35

        They're in-ear noise cancelling earphones, like the QC20.

      • ChillBro on 31/07/2016 - 20:48
        +1

        You meant that the QC30 are in-ear monitors and not full sized headphones and therefore not comparable to the QC35 but people seem to have misunderstood that.

    • kwchaz on 31/07/2016 - 17:34
      +2

      Not if you can't handle in-ears, so I'm nabbing the QC35.

      • ATangk on 31/07/2016 - 20:50

        The QC30 isn't like the normal in ears, but whatever floats your boat. My QC25 for some reason are starting to get a bit toasty. They were fine for a whole year, so not sure what the issue with mine are, maybe it's just me…

        • kwchaz on 31/07/2016 - 20:58
          -1

          Me and earbuds are a no go, unfortunately. Wax, wax, wax. :/

    • engineeringprof on 31/07/2016 - 20:36
      +1

      I find the over-ears to be better with regards to comfort and noise cancelling

    • ATangk on 31/07/2016 - 20:49

      I am waiting, but I'm not sure if there will be a sale before December. Hoping to get TRS on it.

    • dpoon73 on 31/07/2016 - 21:51
      -2

      I was very excited however, I am not sure anymore because it does not have 3.5mm input (cannot use on plane), so I am not sure. If QC20 is around $250, I might buy that instead of QC30

      • ATangk on 31/07/2016 - 21:54

        3.5mm input into the headphone? Or 3.5mm into the console on the plane?

        • dpoon73 on 31/07/2016 - 23:09
          +1

          Yes, QC30 will not be able to connect to the console on the plane. Also, by right, we should not be using bluetooth on the plane, so really cannot use QC30 on the plane even with your phone.

        • ATangk on 01/08/2016 - 10:43

          @dpoon73:
          Just buy the airplane to 3.5mm adapter. There is still the cable if that was what you meant.

      • travs on 01/08/2016 - 02:20
        +3

        This is NOT correct.

        https://www.bose.com.au/en_au/products/headphones/over_ear_h…

        Go to the "in the box" section.
        Included are the "Airline Adapter" and "Audio Cable for Wired Connection"

        You can also look at the manual here:

        https://www.bose.com.au/content/dam/Bose_DAM/Web/consumer_el…

        It clearly shows the "Backup Audio Cable".

        • kevorulez on 01/08/2016 - 11:30

          The reply you replied to is about the QC30, the link you are referring to is the QC35.

          At this stage there are no reliable confirmation that the QC30 congress with audio bypass cable, we can only wait and see.

        • ATangk on 01/08/2016 - 17:32

          @kevorulez:
          All these numbers get me confused. Either way, I think Bose will think of some way to do it. The Frequent Flyer is part of their core target audience so I don't think they would be dumb enough to release a product like that. (Or would they?)

  • Jackal on 31/07/2016 - 17:05
    +4

    Everytime I see QC headphones on OzB, I recall the Pricing error of December 2014 that coincided with an AMEX offer.

    There was no turning back from OzB after that.

    • butterbuts on 31/07/2016 - 23:27

      Or when dicksmith went under and they were $230 odd as well. Spewing I didn't buy some then.

  • kwchaz on 31/07/2016 - 17:35

    Some Ozbargainers have been able to get this price matched at the BOSE store, and in conjunction with the Amex Mid-Year special (ends today!), gotten it for less than $424.15. For those with multiple Amex cards, and a planned OS trip, this can be as low as $265.59.

    • engineeringprof on 31/07/2016 - 20:37
      -1

      Cool story, care to share details?

      • kwchaz on 31/07/2016 - 20:41

        It's too late lol… the Mid-year offer ended today (spend $100 at participating retailers, get $30 back - split it across four transactions, minimum two cards, get $120 back), and the Bose stores all closed at 6pm.
        GST refund on the $424.15 would have been $38.56. Total cashback would have been $158.56.

        • engineeringprof on 31/07/2016 - 20:42
          +1

          Props to the bose store for letting you split it over 4 cards

        • kwchaz on 31/07/2016 - 20:45
          +1

          @engineeringprof:

          Indeed. One store would only do 10% off, but the Miranda one matched the 15% off.
          Photo ID was required for doing such a 'suspicious' thing as splitting it to so many transactions.

        • engineeringprof on 31/07/2016 - 21:24

          @kwchaz: Nice, great work! You have definitely earned your OzB licence!

  • a22andrew on 31/07/2016 - 18:33
    +2

    did this a couple of weeks ago after buying Daiso headphones for $2 for trade in. No issues with doing that - sales guy at Bourke St thought it was a little amusing, that's all.

  • Fredfloresjr on 31/07/2016 - 18:49

    Sick headphones! Got it for 399$ at myer last month

    • [Deactivated] on 31/07/2016 - 20:09

      Same here. Worth every penny :-)

  • genes888 on 31/07/2016 - 18:55
    +1

    Bought these prior to my O/S trip. Best cans I've ever used while travelling. Had em on for 12 hours straight on the plane. It pretty much blocked out all noise on the plane. Was even able to use em as quasi ear plugs while asleep(with anc still running without music), most peaceful sleep I've had on a plane! Well worth the price with Myer sale, Amex Cashback & also gst refund!

    • muncan on 31/07/2016 - 19:06
      +2

      I wonder how the ANC compares to $10 cans

      • AlexF on 01/08/2016 - 08:30

        You probably meant it in jest, but I use those over my IEMs to listen to podcasts during very noisy commutes. Together, there is nothing better in term of noise blockage, and I couldn't care less that they look utilitarian.
        (I've seen professional gamers use their preferred IEMs under the fancy headsets their sponsors paid them to wear.)

        • muncan on 01/08/2016 - 09:40

          Lol thanks for confirming. Wack some OzB stickers on the sides and fellow commuters will treat you with the utmost respect.

        • AlexF on 01/08/2016 - 15:39

          Wack some OzB stickers …

          Holy crap, where do I get these? Scotty!!!!!!!!?

    • Chall5 on 31/07/2016 - 19:08

      Do they come with one of those airplane adapters ?

      • dandandan on 31/07/2016 - 19:22

        yes.

      • AlexF on 01/08/2016 - 08:40
        -2

        No, they're wireless, don't require charging, their noise rejection complies to an Australian standard, their battery is weightless and doesn't deteriorate with age, and, if you lose or drop them, it's no big loss. [edit:] Oh, and they're waterproof and shock-resistant.

        • muncan on 01/08/2016 - 09:41

          I believe you need to download the 35.1 update to enable the waterproof feature.

    • xoom on 31/07/2016 - 20:08

      Main reason i bought the qc35 for my upcoming O/S trip. Been using it on my daily commute on the train and bus and its making those trips tolerable. Thanks to the top notch ANC.

  • Ryk on 31/07/2016 - 19:09

    Bargain!

  • Chall5 on 31/07/2016 - 19:09
    +2

    Anyone tried the Aldi $39 ones ? Thoughts ?

    • SnakeCasablanca on 01/08/2016 - 08:09

      These ones are at least 1,087% better. So they are worth the price!

    • sepa on 01/08/2016 - 14:32
      +1

      1,087% better? More like 1087% overpriced, like most big brand headphones. I doubt the Bose are even anywhere near twice as good as the Aldi where it counts - sound quality. The QC35 excel at noise cancelling, mostly in the mid and high ranges, which is overkill most of the time. Many others match them in the low register for blocking plane engine noise, or just buy some ear plugs. The QC35s sound great plugged in, and pretty good on Bluetooth but the Sony MDR-ZX770BN for one sound easily as good on Bluetooth, and you can pick up a refurb pair for a fraction the price. Don't get me wrong, the QC35s are very good headphones, but no bargain at anywhere near $400, imo. Think half that price.

  • tradiesunited on 31/07/2016 - 19:41

    lost the cable for qc25, where can I get a genuine replacement?

    • coco1458 on 31/07/2016 - 19:43

      Give bose a call, they'll hook you up

      • tradiesunited on 01/08/2016 - 08:10

        You're kidding?

        • coco1458 on 01/08/2016 - 08:12

          I think Bose has an Amazon store if you wanna check it out

        • tradiesunited on 01/08/2016 - 11:10

          Yes, I called them up. You can only order the replacement over the phone. The cable cost $50 plus delivery $5. Man they make a killing for just a cable. On the bose USA site the cable is half the price and free shipping. They should sell these cable instore. My rant is complete. phew

        • tradiesunited on 01/08/2016 - 11:11

          @tradiesunited:

          Looking at the one on ebay now 7$ as an alternative cheap replacement. not sure if there is any significant sound quality difference.

    • Nousernamehere on 31/07/2016 - 19:57

      A mate just got one from a Bose store, $50 as he had changed over from an iPhone to an Android.

      Lucky for me he sold me his old cable for $15, always handy to have a spare!

    • peetah on 01/08/2016 - 15:03

      I was after a QC25 cable as a backup for my QC35s and the staff at the Bose store said I'd have to call up spare parts – at least for the android variant. $50 – 1800023367 option 4.

      • tradiesunited on 01/08/2016 - 20:40

        Same got the exact same answer

  • thewinchester on 31/07/2016 - 20:00

    This offer expires COB tomorrow.

  • lawyerz on 31/07/2016 - 20:45
    +2

    I just bought this today from Sound Premium just wanted to note that the sound leakage is pretty bad! surprising as I thought their target was for use on board a plane.

    • genes888 on 31/07/2016 - 21:14
      +1

      What kind of sounds were you able to hear? I used mine on a recent 12hour plane trip & was able to block out most noise other than someone up close (~30cm distance) telling me the food was being served. It also blocked out the rather loud cabin announcements. Have yet to do much testing on public transport tho!

      • BargainKen on 31/07/2016 - 21:38
        +2

        I think sound leakage means outside people can hear what you're playing

      • coco1458 on 31/07/2016 - 21:38
        +1

        He's more talking about what music other people can hear from outside the QC35's.
        Honestly I'll have to agree, the sound leakage is quite large, anything above half volume on an iPhone and people are bound to hear what you're listening to

        • genes888 on 01/08/2016 - 00:02

          Thanks for the clarification guys.

          Haven't actually tried to listen to sound leakage from the headphones myself actually. Was too busy enjoying the noise cancellation while using them. Haha..

          Didn't get any complaints from other passengers on the flight, so hopefully it wasn't loud enough for them to care!

        • coco1458 on 01/08/2016 - 00:04

          @genes888: the sound leakage isn't insanely loud but at about 3/4 volume on my iPhone you can clearly hear what music is playing from about 1 meter away. Kind've concerning but who cares, the anc is awesome

      • lawyerz on 31/07/2016 - 21:39
        +1

        I meant sound leakage from my headphones - i.e. other people can hear my music playing.

        EDIT: I see people above have replied. Interesting how no one brought that up in the hundred billion reviews or so for this headset.

        • BargainKen on 31/07/2016 - 22:35

          Cuz nobody cares? Or the koolaid hasn't run out yet

        • scheps on 31/07/2016 - 22:51

          Difficult to realise and care factor probably pretty low.

        • Console on 31/07/2016 - 23:07
          +8

          @scheps: Sure it may be difficult to realise when your own headphones are leaking sound but incredibly obvious and frustrating when someone else's are! I find it most annoying when someone on a train insists on using crappy earphones that you can hear from the other end of the carriage! I always wonder if that person realises that they are "that guy." Personally, I would care if my headphones/earphones were leaking sound, especially in an enclosed space like a train or plane.

        • lawyerz on 01/08/2016 - 08:21

          @Console: ditto. I feel the same way. A little bit let down actually, as everyone is saying these are 'closed' headphones that at would leak less sound than an 'open' one.

          It doesn't need to be loud to hear your music at all, especially sitting next to someone on a train or plane. Reckon from 50% volume, it's audible.

        • nexus4 on 01/08/2016 - 09:30

          @lawyerz:

          If there is sound leakage, I doubt it would be to such an extent that people sitting next to you on a plane (where there is inevitably a huge amount of background noise) could hear. Add the fact that on a long haul flight pretty much everyone is wearing headphones anyway, and it's largely a non-issue. Electric trains/trams are a different story of course, but hopefully the noise cancelling would allow users of these to listen at a low volume, which would prevent too much leakage.

        • lawyerz on 01/08/2016 - 13:07

          @nexus4: There is a sound leakage, not if. And it is to that extent, based on my own usage with them and as mentioned above, you can clearly hear what I'm listening to up to a meter away.

          The issue here is so people can make an informed decision. Personally, I would consider it an issue, however big is up to you. You are right in saying that the noise cancellation allows you to hear it at lower volumes.

        • nexus4 on 01/08/2016 - 13:11

          @lawyerz:

          To the extent that someone on a plane sitting one meter away, with headphones on, could hear what you're listening to?

        • lawyerz on 01/08/2016 - 16:07

          @nexus4: Probably not if he/she had their own earphones on. But if it was a red eye flight and people were sleeping, it's definitely audible - depending on your volume. In any case, it's probably not a dealbreaker, the noise cancellation is indeed very impressive.

          I also do feel the 'pressure' on my ears when the earphones are on, especially when no music is playing. Might take a little getting used to.

    • travs on 01/08/2016 - 02:23

      Yours is the FIRST comment I've read that is giving me pause. I just got a new pair of QC25s but bluetooth is a killer feature.

      How do they compare with the QC25s? The 25's don't really leak sound IMO. I mean, you can't really go to the library and have your headphones turned up all the way.

      http://www.rtings.com/headphones/reviews/bose/quietcomfort-3…

      It has then as better than the QC25s which are acceptable IMO.

Login or Join to leave a comment
Login Join