[PS4] Free - Black Lives Matter Theme @ PlayStation Store

Moved to Forum: Original Link

Give your PlayStation®4 system’s home screen a personal touch with this special theme in show of support for the Black Lives Matter Movement.

Themes can be downloaded to give your on-screen display a completely new look, changing the background, icons and colours to match your favourite game or style.

After downloading, you can select the theme you want to use via the Themes option on the PS4™ system’s Settings menu.

Download of this product is subject to the PlayStation Network Terms of Service and our Software Usage Terms plus any specific additional conditions applying to this product. If you do not wish to accept these terms, do not download this product. See Terms of Service for more important information.

One-time licence fee to download to multiple PS4 systems. Sign in to PlayStation Network is not required to use this on your primary PS4, but is required for use on other PS4 systems.


Mod:

Deal Posting Guidelines: Free Multimedia & Content:

There are so many useful free multimedia content (e.g. ebooks, videos, photos, software, apps etc.) and websites out there that if we listed every great one, then we would be inundated with deals. Feel free to discuss any of these in one of our forums. Alternatively, add the freeware to its dedicated free software wiki page – Useful Free Software.

In general, multimedia content that are always free and available to everyone should be posted in the forums, but if something that was not previously free is offered free temporarily or permanently, it qualifies as a deal. In some cases, decisions on whether a post should stay as a deal or be moved to a forum post is at moderators discretion.

Related Stores

PlayStation
PlayStation

Comments

    • -1

      Exactly this.

      • Agreeing with someone else's comment isn't a valid reason for a negative vote.

    • There are not enough letters and words in the english language to express how truly ridiculous your post is.

  • +62

    Can we keep gaming and politics separate.
    It’s my only escape from all the noise.

    • +32

      I don't think anyone is forcing you to download it.

      • +24

        Correct.

        However in the spirit of fairness. Equality. We should really not start including things like this.
        It’s a deep hole and where will it stop.

        I’m not racist but I’m sure people will say I am.

        • +37

          If you dare have an opinion or ask any questions of the BLM movement you must be a racist. RACIST RACIST RACIST!!!

          • +6

            @Pennypacka: Kind of like when you criticize a certain nation…

      • +1

        It's a fair point though. Another example is with sports matches being politicised and is upsetting some people (e.g. choosing not to stand during national anthem). Yeah no one is forcing them to attend or watch the match, but it used to be a place where everyone with a common interest could come together and put their differences aside. But if companies or organisations decide to go political, it indirectly forces divide and is not a healthy direction for society in the long term.

    • +13

      Some good news for your friend, you can! Simply don't install the theme :)

      • -2

        would you say the same thing if someone put a Nazi theme?

    • +1

      Support those behaving appropriately with your patronage, punish those with boycott who are not.

      The only thing a corporation ultimately care about is money. The virtue signalling is only about money (which is why you'll never see a Free Hong Kong/Taiwan banner on any Sony site).

  • +10

    Yes piss off with the political propoganda millions of people die everyday

    • +27

      Why did you go out of your way to find a deal posted for something you don't care about just to get offended by it?

      • +8

        How do you know he doesn't care about PS4 backgrounds? He just doesn't like political agendas being involved in it.

        • -1

          Why are you assuming that they are a 'he'?

    • +3

      Yeh, you anti cancer people can piss off too.

  • +12

    Billion of colours to choose from and they go with the same colours as the Proud Boys. Hilarious.

    • +9

      The proud boys only have those colours because that was the only Fred Perry combination in black they could find.
      Fred Perry has now discontinued that colour.

      • +2

        I took a look and it turns out that they're just not selling in North America.

  • +76

    Propaganda is not a bargain

    • +9

      5g gone to your head ?

      • +23

        Has propaganda gone to yours?

        • +9

          I don't use Facebook or Murdoch news, so no.

          • +16

            @onlinepred: But what about the CCP run TikTok or black twitter

          • +6

            @onlinepred: really Facebook is where you draw the line?

            • +6

              @yannyrjl: As a news source.. this is basic knowledge.

              • +3

                @onlinepred: curious where you would consider a reasonable news sources?

                • +3

                  @yannyrjl: This is ozb, not Facebook. Argue conspiracies and misinformation there. No need source is perfect, it's why any normal person looks at more than one source that does not consist of Murdoch or Facebook haha

                  • +2

                    @onlinepred: why not look at multiple sources including Murdoch and Facebook and find the intersecting points which are more likely to be reliable facts. Also, you can probably get a better understand of the broader spectrum of ideas / perspectives. Unfortunately most news sources are tainted with opinions both traditional and new media.

          • +2

            @onlinepred: At the very least, distributing this theme to a worldwide audience is culturally inappropriate.

            BLM is part of a very American problem. I leave it to our friends in the US to figure out to deal with racism and violent protests in their country. But I sure as hell don’t want any of this here.

            • @maxbon: So screw the rest of the world? Okay mate. Stay off Facebook and put your tin foil hat back on

        • +1

          Damn straight, the rubbish you believe in is the truth not propaganda. Am I right?

  • +34

    Do they have any White Pride themes? Asian Pride?
    Asking for a friend.

    • +28

      This is a BLM theme not a Black Pride theme. Maybe you should be looking for bargains for glasses, and maybe some history books as well

      • +6

        Yea lookup history of the one billion people enslaved by the exact same ideology that drives BLM.

        • +6

          I quite like Marx but I'm not at all supportive of the regimes of Mao or Stalin or any other 'Communist' tyrants. Where do I fit in?

          • +7

            @WinstonWithAY: Don't confuse the capitalists

          • +4

            @WinstonWithAY: Trotsky? the lesser tyrannical can't win the power struggles as show by Trotsky to Stalin and Liu to Mao

            • +3

              @yannyrjl: Don't like Trotsky either since he crushed the anarchist movement in Ukraine. Also what you're saying isn't even true, you can have socialism without tyrannical dictators, Catalonia is an example

          • @WinstonWithAY:

            I quite like Marx but I'm not at all supportive of the regimes of …

            So you like socialism as a political ideology but not when it is put into practice?

        • Special one.

      • I demand a Native American People Matter theme! If they don't do it, then I guess they believe Native American people don't matter! /s

    • +1

      Hey, it's the AZN better recognise

  • +26

    Eww, Richmond colours.

    • +3

      Not even the footy is safe from politics

  • +32

    Who would have thought the venn diagram overlaps that much between racists and people who are looking for a bargain. please be better

    • +5

      Who would of thought it overlaps with those looking for a bargain (capitalism) and supporters of BLM (Marxism)

      • +4

        I can't believe the amount of filthy marxist sympathisers on here. That and the amount of truly uninformed people is amazing to me.

        • +3

          Heres another one.

          Googles marxism, 5 minutes later, world leading authority.

          • +2

            @doobes: Unfortunately you have no evidence of that so it's most likely that you're projecting.

            Why don't you stop with the ad hominems and actually try to argue the point. Try with these ones: the BLM leaders are trained marxist organisers and marxism is an evil cult of envy.

            • +1

              @Ghos7: What is a "trained Marxist"? Marxism isn't a job or a skill, it's an ideology. This "trained Marxist" point is a right-wing talking point and wrong. There's nothing wrong with being a Marxist as well

              • +2

                @WinstonWithAY: You missed the word organisers. They are trained marxist organisers.

                Don't believe me? Find the video of them saying exactly that.

                You clowns really are the most ill informed bunch of NPC drones.

            • +1

              @Ghos7: Again. They arent, but even if they were the BLM movement has nothing to do with marxism.

                • +1

                  @wrjcu: The founders are Marxists. Not everyone who is in the movement or supportive of it is one. Again, what is a "Trained Marxist". Provide a definition and a reason why that is bad in the first place.

                  • @WinstonWithAY: And here we go with the goalpost shifting.

                    LMAOOOO

                    • @Ghos7: Wait, there's something wrong with organisers having training? What? I didn't move the goalposts at all.

                  • @WinstonWithAY: Do you apply that theory to Neo Nazi groups as well?

                • @wrjcu: @wrjcu well that certainly makes things awkward for these guys……

      • +1

        Don't be like this guy. Talk about stuff you actually know about. Don't just read headlines you see on facebook or watch any sky news.

    • +6

      Problem is the BLM in America was no longer about racism protesting months ago. The main group in Portland only caused chaos and opportunities for looters. There are new evidences that the group is funded by the CCP

      • +3

        No their isnt.

        • -2

          Do you have proof of that or are you just spouting what you saw someone say on facebook? Sorry about triggering your cognitive dissonance.

          • +3

            @Ghos7: I have to prove something is not true but the statement that it is true is ok to go on by.

            I see you.

            • @doobes: So you're going to continue to avoid providing anything but personal attacks and baseless claims and you want me to go target someone else?

              OK…..

              You had your chance to ask Scythic to prove it but you didn't, you pretended to know there was no evidence. Something that there is no way for you to know or prove. Classic leftist hot air.

              • @Ghos7: There isnt. Its simple.

                I asked my spaghetti overlord.

                Don't believe it exists? Prove it.

    • I though it's "do better" not be better.

    • Stop saying that criticising BLM is racism. This is totalitarian.

  • +24

    All lives matter!

    • +28

      no-one is saying Only Black Lives Matter

      • +33

        No, but the argument is over whether Black lives are special.
        The implication is that Blacks are unfairly targeted, but the evidence does not support this.
        Police violence is a big problem in the US, but black violence is far bigger.
        Of course if everybody didn't have such easy access to guns … but that is another story.

        I'm not for a moment saying that black people are not doing it tough. But blaming the problems on white racism is not going to help anyone.
        It is a distraction from the real issues of extreme inequality in the meritocracy.

        The bigger problem in the US is how badly the poor, the weak, are treated, regardless of race. It is a class conflict, and only the elite benefit by turning it into a race war.
        Violence is the US is actually a small issue compared to poverty. I don't think Australians appreciate how bad it is to be poor in the US.

        • +4

          I started to disagree with you after reading the first line, but you've hit the nail on the head. Unfortunately capitalism and American democracy lives and works on inequality. It has to in order to keep the division of power as greatly separate as it is.

          • @Ninternet: It was not always so bad. Millions of blacks (and whites) left the rural South to get well-paying factory jobs in the industrial North, like Detroit.
            They had a prosperous middle-class lifestyle that their children can only dream about.

          • +3

            @Ninternet: Capitalism works on those who contribute the most (as valued by society) reaps the most benefit

            American is a constitutional republic, it is intended not to set up a democracy due to fear of tyranny of majority. The constitution is suppose to protect fundamental "god" given rights such as speech, religion, right to self-defence from the government

            I would argue democracy actually is the worst system for a so call "oppressed" minority

            • +4

              @yannyrjl: You have to realise that, even in the simplest example, capitalism thrives on inequality because so-called valuable or successful products have to be sold at extreme markups and be built by exploiting the cheapest labour possible in the world. Then on top of that those large companies desperately avoid giving back to said societies in the way of taxes.

              • +3

                @Ninternet: I think your building a strawman here

                I presume the cheapest labour possible in the world you mean in China or Vietnam? Run by communist governments who has depressed wages and prevented any form or worker rights since their respective founding?

              • @Ninternet: Evidence is that the wealth gap is expanding

              • +1

                @Ninternet: I would argue in a free society, what you a posing is much more difficult to achieve, I don't particularly see taxes as a way of contribution to society, I see the provision of the goods and services as the greater contributor

                I'm guessing our philosophies differ in how we what responsibilities lies with the government vs the individual. In my opinion, I want to be responsible for my own well-being and I want the government to get out of the way.

                Some government interventions are required if they help prevent others infringing on my rights, I'm not for welfare, rather I prefer a closer knit community structure

            • +1

              @yannyrjl: Republics are democratic by definition. Also, imagine being against tyranny whilst also being against democracy.

              • +1

                @WinstonWithAY: Democratic Yes, democracy in it's literal sense No.

                So against tyranny also against democracy (true meaning). For democratic systems that derives from democracy but safe guards some of the short comings.

            • +1

              @yannyrjl:

              I would argue democracy actually is the worst system for a so call "oppressed" minority

              I wonder what millions of people in Cambodia and other Marxist countries think of that comment

        • +9

          Oh they hate it when you show them facts like the biggest threat to an African American person in America is another African American.

          https://www.cdc.gov/healthequity/lcod/men/2016/nonhispanic-b…
          Leading cause of death in African American males aged 1-44 is Homicide.

          https://ucr.fbi.gov/crime-in-the-u.s/2016/crime-in-the-u.s.-…

          2016 Homicide stats show that of the 2870 Black or African American deaths the perpetrator was Black or African American in over 2500 of the cases.

          Interestingly the reverse is true for white people.

          • +2
            • +2

              @yannyrjl: Oh dont tell me you dont like facts reported by government agency's because it doesnt fit the "poor black people" narrative? Remind me of anti vaxxers not liking facts..

              • +1

                @Ravensbane: Dude, I'm agreeing with you that Black on Black crime in the US is out of control, various factors. I see the root cause being the absence of Fathers. >70% of black households without fathers is ridiculous, not saying single mother aren't trying, but because of single parent income lower than dual, they are living in poorer areas, also most single mothers have to work to support the family so for long periods of times black teens are unsupervised in lower social economic areas which has high crime and gang presence.

                • +1

                  @yannyrjl: I heard a black commentator in America mention that the biggest issue in the black community is the absence of fathers. The welfare system has incentivised a single parent family. People would rather play the racist card than have an open mind.

              • @Ravensbane: Black people are poor as (profanity) due to systematic racism. Maybe read this article instead of just quoting statistics without any analysis:
                https://www.brookings.edu/blog/up-front/2020/02/27/examining…

          • +2

            @Ravensbane: You're right. BLM love crime actually in black communities. None of this changes the fact that police brutality is still a problem that needs to be dealt with. Not sure what you're proving

          • @Ravensbane: Black people kill black people?

            It certainly is that simplisitic.

            Unless of course you want to actually find the underlying causes of crime.
            Definitely nothing to do with poverty which definitely has nothing to do with inequality and definitely has nothing to do with race.

            • @doobes: Be careful about assigning cause to correlation. Sarcasm is no substitute for unbiased logic.

              Poverty correlates to crime, but even controlling for poverty (and socioeconomics generally) there is far more crime among (male) blacks in the US (i.e than poor whites). You could also look at history, and other countries, and see your theory melt away.
              Why do you assume that racism causes violent crime and not the other way around?

              China has worse poverty but less crime.
              A clue is in the association between crime, poverty and IQ scores: https://scholar.google.com.au/scholar?q=crime+poverty+and+iq

        • You dont know what your'e doing.

    • +17

      Cheers, was waiting for someone to say this so I can link to this excellent comic! https://chainsawsuit.com/comic/2016/07/07/all-houses-matter-…

      It communicates a response to your thoughtless (and unfortunately common) comment better than I ever could.

      • +6

        Ther problem with your comic - and the movement - is that it assumes the correctness of its conclusion, whereas there is little to no evidence of its truth.
        To be clearer and more specific for your comic - while SOME black people feel their house is on fire, the statistics seems to show that a mild case of rising damp is probably closer to the truth - and that case of rising damp is substantially better than the flooding it was suffering just a few decades ago.

        • +12

          "Black people should be happy they aren't getting murdered by police as much as they used to" -blaircam

          • +6

            @Ezekiel2320: Like I said, people who support BLM assume the correctness of their conclusion - where the actual evidence does not support it.
            Murder has a meaning and requires a conviction. Police being found guilty of murdering ANYONE have always been rare.

            • @Almost Banned: Yes. Remember how surprised people were when Mohamed Noor was convicted of murder after killing the Australian woman?
              Of course nobody was screaming racism, but the police rounded the wagons and defended the killer cop as usual.
              Somehow he was convicted. Was it because the victim was a white woman? Maybe, but even so it was unexpected, and in hindsight was the start of increased accountability for police, and police forces in the US.

              • @bargaino: Only 3rd-degree murder and 2nd degree manslaughter apparently.
                Now google Dillon Taylor - almost everyone has heard of Michael Brown or Eric Garner, very few will have heard of Dillon Taylor.

                • @Almost Banned: Dillon Taylor was a few years before Justine Damond, and yes, that was the way of things.

                  That's why Noor's conviction came as a shock.
                  3rd degree murder is fine. Nobody thought it was premeditated. Some say the real problem is the system that fast-tracked him on the basis of race, ignoring red flags.

Login or Join to leave a comment