Mahindra XUV700 AX7 2024 Plate from $33,990 Drive-Away (Save $3000) @ Mahindra Dealers

2011
Mahindra XUV700 AX7 2024 Plate from $33,990 Drive-Away (Save $3000) @ Mahindra Dealers
Go to Deal
I like GoodDeals on 14/01/2025 - 16:18 mahindra.com.au (7440 clicks)
Last edited 11/02/2025 - 11:12 by 1 other user

New Year, New Car Deal!

Mahindra XUV700 Run Out Sale on 2024 Plate Vehicles. Offer ends 31st January or while stocks last.

  • XUV700 AX7 from $33,990 Drive-Away (Save $3000)
  • XUV700 AX7L from $36,990 Drive-Away (Save $3000)

Features:

  • Petrol Engine with 149.2 kw (200bhp) and 380 Nm Torque
  • 7 Year Roadside assist
  • 7 Year/150,000 kms Warranty
  • Choose your Seating style - 7, 6 or 5 seats.
  • Dual HD 10.25” Infotainment and 10.25” Digital Cluster Screens (copied from Merc)
  • Sunroof - largest-in-segment
  • Diamond Cut Alloy Wheels
  • 2nd & 3rd Row Air Conditioning
  • Rear View Camera
  • ISOFIX Child Seat Anchors
  • Push Button Start
  • Leatherette Seats
  • 6 Speakers with Sound Staging
  • Android Auto and Apple Carplay
  • Cornering Lamp

Safety Features

  • Traffic Sign Recognition
  • Adaptive Cruise Control
  • High Beam Assist
  • Emergency Auto Braking
  • Lane Keep Assist
  • Smart Pilot Assist
  • Front Collision Warning
  • 7 Airbags
  • ESP
  • Hill Decent + Roll Stability Control + Post Collision Braking + Brake Assist

Looks like good amount of kit and safety features for the base model.

AX7L Variant adds

  • 3D Audio with 12 Speakers
  • 360º Surround View camera
  • Stop and Go function in Adaptive Cruise Control
  • Blind View Monitor
  • Wireless Charging

Couldn't find the Car sales figures as Mahindra may not be reporting the sales numbers. Seen a quite number of XUV700's in Melbourne in the past 1 year. The Product offering, features and the value for money proposition isn't bad.

Cheers!

Automotive Car Mahindra SUV

Related Stores

Mahindra Automotive
Mahindra Automotive

Comments

  • Gdsamp on 14/01/2025 - 16:19
    +41

    Incredible value

      • coffeeinmyveins on 14/01/2025 - 17:17
        +83

        did not hear good things about mahindra

        They ended up going to Chery.

        Lol. Out of the fire into the frying pan.

      • happydude on 14/01/2025 - 17:27
        +94

        So a dealership that did not currently sell Mahindra, but did sell Chery, said to buy a Chery? What a shocker.

        I would also note that Mahindra is Indian, not Chinese.

        • bboz on 14/01/2025 - 18:36
          +8

          OP didn't suggest Mahindra was Chinese. The Chery dealership told him about Mahindra.

          I wouldn't buy either.

          • Jackson on 15/01/2025 - 00:40
            +2

            @bboz: You can get away with buying an EV from these co.s, which are generally inherently more reliable, but maybe not a ICE vehicle, too many movie parts/potential issues to worry about

            • marcozmitch on 15/01/2025 - 01:12

              @Jackson: I definately think EV's from X car company are less problematic, as stated above, but I was after an ICE vehicle.
              The problem people will face, is the length of time you have to wait to be able to buy a favored Jap or other imported car that has long wait times.
              I am talking 6 months or more.
              I could not wait that long, and also the amount in $$ was $10 K or more for a similar vehicle.
              I do think cars have a very inflated value and once brand X vehicles are everwhere, will the market change.

              • coffeeinmyveins on 15/01/2025 - 10:44

                @marcozmitch:

                I do think cars have a very inflated value and once brand X vehicles are everwhere, will the market change.

                Australia has always paid more for vehicles compared to the rest of the world. Our LCT doesn't help, but we're a smaller market so we pay a premium for them.

                Since covid prices went crazy, but reality is coming back.

          • jaygee on 15/01/2025 - 18:19

            @bboz: He says 'I went chinese car-hunting recently' so not sure if OP knew it wasn't Chinese

    • Drakesy on 14/01/2025 - 16:31
      +98

      Lol no

      it's a 79 year old company…

      And actually makes decent 4wds.

      • HamBoi69 on 14/01/2025 - 18:25
        +5

        decent 4wds.

        Can vouch. Drove a mates the other day and was surprised.

        • tonyjzx on 14/01/2025 - 18:33
          +18

          theyre going to be around as they are financed by the indian govt. lol

          they build all their military vehicles

          • Drakesy on 14/01/2025 - 18:52
            +1

            @tonyjzx: If they brought in their version of Australia's Hawkei for the public…

            • dextertheboygenius on 14/01/2025 - 20:50
              +24

              @Sean8802: Settle down champ, probably will be able wipe us out in sheer numbers. They are the second largest in the world with nuclear capabilities.

              • 1st-Amendment on 15/01/2025 - 09:34
                -7

                @dextertheboygenius:

                probably will be able wipe us out in sheer numbers

                'The barbarians never take a city until someone holds the gates open to them. And it's your own multicultural authorities who will do it for you'

                -Christopher Hitchens

            • npnp on 14/01/2025 - 21:34
              -4

              @Sean8802: Lol. Living under a rock hey.. Good on you buddy.

            • VBO on 14/01/2025 - 22:39
              -3

              @Sean8802: How dare you mocking a YouTube superpower!

            • smartProverble on 15/01/2025 - 09:51
              +1

              @Sean8802: India is a nuclear power. That automatically gives them bragging rights.

    • I like GoodDeals on 14/01/2025 - 16:40
      +13

      Well, they have been here in Australia since 2007 - https://www.whichcar.com.au/features/mahindra-s-big-ambition…

      • Mr Bob Dobalina on 14/01/2025 - 17:13
        +8

        I'm pretty sure Mahindra briefly sold the Stockman and Bushranger 4WDs here in the early 90s.

        In any case, they only sold 50 vehicles here in 2007.

        • Matt P on 14/01/2025 - 23:22
          +2

          My uncle had a Stockman. It had a PTO lol

          He talks about that car more than his early 80s Porsche 911 so it obviously did something right.

    • thestig on 14/01/2025 - 17:01
      +37

      Another Ozbargain account spewing BS who will still be spewing BS in 5 years.

      • spast1ka on 15/01/2025 - 08:54
        +3

        check his comment history. all ranting and insults.

    • bargaino on 14/01/2025 - 19:24
      +3

      That's what they said about the Lada Niva!

    • Lets Make Sandwiches on 14/01/2025 - 19:36
      +1

      Best in class engine hahahahaha

    • boomramada on 14/01/2025 - 21:39
      -1

      FYI next time use google for facts befoe make a comment 😉

    • jlien on 15/01/2025 - 10:39

      never heard of them either but when i looked up wikipedia; they seem to be a pretty big company with lots of holdings. For instance they hold 51% of peugeot and 76% of pinafarina

    • StonedWizard on 15/01/2025 - 12:41

      @chadleyshe - They're also been in Australia for over 10 years lmao.

  • Brisbane1 on 14/01/2025 - 16:26
    +5

    This was the same price 6 months back when they brought the Black edition :)

  • SYLTB on 14/01/2025 - 16:27
    +7

    Thank you Indira Ghandi for this discount. Goodbye Elo!

    • Brisbane1 on 14/01/2025 - 19:17
      -7

      You should respect dead people goodbye to you too

      • SYLTB on 14/01/2025 - 19:46
        +2

        That is the respect.

  • King Tightarse on 14/01/2025 - 16:28
    +63

    Fuel Efficiency 8.3 L/100KM plus no ANCAP rating.
    Not great

    • TEER3X on 14/01/2025 - 16:34
      +1

      Yeah not good

      Solid car though

      • mynameisborat on 14/01/2025 - 16:38
        +9

        why isn't the Mahindra's getting an ANCAP certification?

      • billy_bob on 15/01/2025 - 12:22
        +2

        To be fair, 8.3 L/100KM is not bad for a seven seat, petrol engined SUV. And it uses the cheaper 91 RON Unleaded fuel.

        I'm not aware of any that are much better. You have to go either diesel or hybrid if you want much better fuel economy, but then you will be paying much more for the car up front.

    • Lord Ra on 14/01/2025 - 16:41
      +35

      Indian car, probably why no ANCAP rating.
      They're built like tractor though, based off my past experience.
      Lots of vibrations, noisy cabin, noisy diesel engines, very hard ride quality from stiff suspension (due to sh*t Indian roads I presume). But they last a long long time. Reliable, unlike the Jeeps. And some other peeps.

      • mynameisborat on 14/01/2025 - 16:45
        +2

        is it difficult for Indian cars to get an ANCAP rating ?

        • slackerman on 14/01/2025 - 17:04
          +14

          If the governing body would have been in india they would have even get ANCAP ultra plus rating in no time.

        • Pcoder on 14/01/2025 - 17:14
          +7

          It has a 'Global' NCAP rating, but that appears to be using a lower standard of testing to our ANCAP/EuroNCAP as it says two airbags and five stars but with the recent ANCAP/EuroNCAP standard, you'd need more airbags as they require curtain airbags throughout the car to get a five stars.

          It probably hasn't gone to the effort to get the ANCAP or EuroNCAP as they only really have a small presence in both markets.

          I think part of the issue coming up is there are multitudes of newish brands coming into the Australian market and not all will survive and since Mahindra was already a minor player, there is always a fear you could be left holding the bag if they decided to exit.

          This is going to be an issue for the next couple of years as I dont see all the Chinese marks surviving .

          • the-fuzz on 15/01/2025 - 09:00

            @Pcoder: They have been in Australia for 18 years?

      • TEER3X on 14/01/2025 - 17:10
        +7

        Built like a tractor because they've been making tractors for decades.

        I've read their cars are very reliable, just a shame about the fuel economy.

      • Avi0001 on 14/01/2025 - 17:17
        +6

        I do agree that most of the Mahindra cars are useless after couple of years with vibration and noisy cabin. Quality is not that much great.

      • SydBoy on 14/01/2025 - 17:41
        +4

        Well, I use XUV700 for almost 1.5 year and I have no issues with vibration or noisy cabin or suspension..! So do the test drive as this model is made to very high standard and provide great comfort while driving.

        • Alphahiankush on 14/01/2025 - 20:05
          +1

          I have this from last 2 years and no issues of noiseand vibrations.

          Never faced the issues what people are referring to avoid these. Infact i am pretty happy with its excellent value for money

        • cloudy on 15/01/2025 - 09:37

          hows the fuel economy?

          • SydBoy on 15/01/2025 - 11:28

            @cloudy: Honestly not great in city (8.5km - 9km per ltr) but on motorway it's excellent (14km per ltr). You can increase city driving mileage by using Cruze control, as I noticed whenever I used Cruze control it gives way more average then driving without Cruze control.

            However, it is powerful compared to Mitsubishi or Nissan as I test drive both before buying.

            So it's about your budget, power you want and mileage you are after.

        • Pcoder on 14/01/2025 - 17:54

          The reason why they are unrated is more to do with bureaucracy then never being tested.

          Most of the time the unrated cars are due to it's testing being more than five years old and some changes that were made to the scoring since then. So they have decided to unrate cars now even though they may be perfectly safe.

        • dealsucker on 14/01/2025 - 19:21
          +3

          Oh the R card again. Chill it's just a car company and has only just started making half decent cars.

          • 1st-Amendment on 15/01/2025 - 09:41
            +2

            @dealsucker:

            Oh the R card again

            These people are bots. The response to every discussion is either racism, sexism or homophobia. Someone needs to update their firmware…

        • 1st-Amendment on 15/01/2025 - 09:40
          +4

          Try harder with racism next time.

          rAcIsM! lol… India literally has some of the worst roads in the world. But sure, everyone who disagrees is Hitler right?

          https://i.kym-cdn.com/entries/icons/original/000/021/818/hit…

      • 16k-zx81 on 14/01/2025 - 18:52

        So, are you talking about all indian cars, all Mahindras, or just this model? Just curious.

      • OzzyBoy1 on 14/01/2025 - 19:33

        Yeah sure. Roads in India aren't great but these days roads here in Sydney or even Melbourne aren't that great. Road near me is full of pot holes and for months hasn't fixed still. So we need such cars here too..lol

    • Megatron on 14/01/2025 - 16:50
      +8

      From what I know they have 5* NCAP rating but ANCAP will not rate them due to no ADAS.. other than that they have all the safety features required for a 5* rating.

      https://www.globalncap.org/news/mahindra-xuv700

      These things are also apparently as reliable as a toyota.. there are Aussie reviews on Youtube that boast about these.

      • pulpfiction on 14/01/2025 - 17:20
        +22

        This. It’s why ANCAP is so terrible. They promote systems that actively distract the driver as well as those which are effective. They do not apply empirical evidence to verify safety, just a tick box if the car had it.

        Mitsubishi recently scaled back their driver attention in the Pajero Sport as it was chronically distracting. ANCAP made zero mention of this.

        • Oyster59 on 14/01/2025 - 18:15
          +2

          I recently drove a new Triton and the driver monitoring was infuriating. Baffles me that they could test that thing and say it was ready for production. Good to hear they're changing it.

    • Drakesy on 14/01/2025 - 17:51
      +11

      Rolls Royce don't have ANCAP ratings on their cars and their fuel efficiency is abysmal.

      Does that make this a better car?

      • Inyokuchi on 15/01/2025 - 00:32
        +1

        That's cause the people who buy them have a convoy around them and can afford the fuel

    • stephendt on 14/01/2025 - 18:00

      Yeah the running costs for this are quite high. I'm not sure I see the appeal.

    • Save Medicare on 14/01/2025 - 18:18
      +2

      Yikes that's 0.3L/100km worse than my 1050kg Japanese car that only carries 2 people

      • tonyjzx on 14/01/2025 - 18:39
        +3

        tbf this is a big family suv that is 1,8 ton empty

        and so you need a turbo 2.0 to push it

        tbh i dont know why a fwd suv is 1.8 ton!

        bad engineering imo

      • dukeGR4 on 15/01/2025 - 18:52

        1050kg Japanese car

        Miat?

    • Zonty on 15/01/2025 - 09:45
      -3

      ANCAP RATING WHY DO YOU NEED? WHEN YOU HAVE GLOBAL NCAP RATING 5 STAR ALREADY?

      THIS ANCAP RATING BASICALLY MORE MONEY MAKING BUSINESS FOR AUSTRALIA GOVERNMENT.

      • King Tightarse on 15/01/2025 - 09:52

        Different countries have different requirement and environmental conditions.
        For example, you would rarely drive in snow and ice in Australia but you might drive in extreme heat and dust. You might have frontal collision with wildlife in Australia etc. Also different countries place different value on occupant's safety.
        Different countries, different conditions.

        • Zonty on 15/01/2025 - 09:53

          Lol then Australian car will have zero star in Indian road. Car would be dead before warranty expires.

          • King Tightarse on 15/01/2025 - 09:56

            @Zonty: That seems like a pretty childish response to: 'different countries have different conditions'
            Anyway, it is up to the Indian government to set the standards and requirements that suit them

            • Zonty on 15/01/2025 - 09:59

              @King Tightarse: Exactly now you saying right. Each government set own standards. My first comment was why do you need ANCAP rating? When you have global NCAP rating. Global means it should be globally safe.

              • King Tightarse on 15/01/2025 - 10:04
                +1

                @Zonty: I said the exact same thing each time: Different countries have different requirements and conditions
                In some countries life is 'cheap' and occupant's safety is less important than a lower price, in others it is more valued and safety standards are higher. Environmental conditions are also different in many countries.
                IE Ice and snow in Canada would require more sophisticated sliding and skidding solutions than hot and dry conditions in Australia.
                Every country is different and the government can apply any standards (or no standards) as they see fit.
                Global rating is a basic 'ballpark' standard.

                • Zonty on 15/01/2025 - 10:10
                  -2

                  @King Tightarse: Most of those standards are built by corporate world which help government to win election.

          • xuqi on 15/01/2025 - 11:33

            @Zonty: India is also ditching NCAP:

            https://www.cardekho.com/india-car-news/different-types-of-n…

    • smartProverble on 15/01/2025 - 09:53

      Dumb and naive way to assess a car.

  • easternculture on 14/01/2025 - 16:28
    +7

    Mahindra, one of my best mates

    • gamesnepal on 14/01/2025 - 17:44
      +5

      *Mahendra, one of my best Kings.

      • HolyCr4p on 14/01/2025 - 18:14
        -3

        Mahondra, one of my best slaves

      • laudalashun on 15/01/2025 - 14:26
        +1

        Birendra, Not too bad either but Gyanendra…. ufff

    • Groovyuvi on 14/01/2025 - 17:47
      -4

      Also 2 cricket worldcups winning indian cricket team captain and a decent wicket-keeper 😆

    • groundward on 14/01/2025 - 16:37
      +28

      A comment without a comma is like a car without brakes—it just keeps going. Is there something you are hinting at?

      • SYLTB on 14/01/2025 - 16:49
        +2

        A mate has one of these (which is) 18 months old. I was amazed how well built (it was/is). His is going/His goes really well (that is) nice to drive. My only thought was the suspension, which was very firm for my liking, but I /(would) live that with easy for the value.
        You are happy now?

          • SYLTB on 14/01/2025 - 17:00
            +1

            @spock:

            word police

            Grammar nazi!

          • Cheapskate Paul on 14/01/2025 - 17:43
            +1

            @spock: It's amazing how the sun makes punctuation disappear, but the words are unaffected.

  • shxhshzhz on 14/01/2025 - 16:31
    +23

    Spend $3k more and get the Haval H6 Hybrid instead, will easily save enough in fuel compared to this very thirsty car

    • dixy on 14/01/2025 - 16:39
      -1

      what is real Fuel Efficiency of Haval H6 Hybrid

    • xyron on 14/01/2025 - 16:40
      +12

      The H6 is a surprisingly good car but it's also only a 5 seater, no good if you need the child/amputee seats in the third row of the Mahindra.

    • KrugerOz on 14/01/2025 - 17:52
      +2

      Well said!!!👍

    • salin on 14/01/2025 - 18:23
      +3

      30 major brands including GWM H6 crash tests.
      Range Rover has a terrible result.
      https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=L6GZfO4lPUQ&ab_channel=Globa…

    • dealhunter52 on 14/01/2025 - 19:54
      +2

      Haval H6 is 5 Seater while XUV700 is 7 Seater.

    • Oofy Doofy on 15/01/2025 - 14:04

      Fuel is the cheapest thing you put into a vehicle.

  • Jessie Ryder on 14/01/2025 - 16:34
    +3

    (copied from Merc) lol

    • smartProverble on 15/01/2025 - 09:55
      -2

      We give the Chinese a pass here with their copying on ozbargain. Why not the Indians too

Login or Join to leave a comment
Login Join