Fellow meat eaters. I saw it in Burnside Coles. Excellent value. I think it’s nation wide.
A juicy patty thats big on taste and succulence. These gourmet burgers are made with high quality, coarse ground Australian Angus beef and brisket, renowned for its incredible flavour. A specially created gourmet sausage of coarse ground Australian Angus beef blended with roasted garlic and fresh parsley.
Good luck finding any. Wasn’t out of stock, just wasn’t anywhere on shelves in my local
healthy meat
When they say Angus beef, that could be any old rubbish - fat, gristle, hooves, who knows. These are sausages and patties not prime steak. Still, I've had their Angus beef sausages before, and they're good sausages.
oof i got this the other day. sausages are thicc. takes longer to cook than regular sausages
One would think the longer you were out there, the happier youd be…
No sausages were harmed in the making of this deal.
Go to YouTube and check cows, goats and horses eating chicken videos. Ruminants are opportunistic omnivores as well (cruel) for quick protein.
killing animals to eat is not cruel. even animals do it! go whine to them
@ProlapsedHeinous: CRUELTY: behaviour which causes physical or mental harm to another, especially a spouse, whether intentionally or not.
They have brains, they feel harm. I am just stating a fact. End of story.
@RexHavoc: Is it human cruelty if Coles don't stock enough or make it cheaper. Humans might mentally be harmed… And physically starved
It's ok.
The 🐄 is 💀 when they carve it up into juicy pieces.
The dead bit. Pain free is it?
You've to find someone that has died to answer that question.
All of a sudden I feel like having a steak! 😋 thank you OP for the deal
I love animals, but especially cows, medium rare.
Mushroom cruelty I do struggle with.
Fact: more mushrooms are killed daily than cows.
Mushrooms have feelings, reproduce mushrooms in family clusters and have measurable pain receptors in its cells.
But it’s not cool to care about mushies, so young Rex doesn’t.
Back in the ass to cook without a BBQ. Got them on short date for $3 before. It was good but a pain to cook with the amount of oil and bounce of the sausage.
Lol wut
I don't know how Pain got auto corrected as back… :( Using a pan to cook these on medium heat was a pain as it releases a lot of oil with the fat %
Not uncommon for sausages, just paper towel them afterwards or switch fans when finishing off.
Never cooked a bouncy sausage in my ass before…interesting…
That’s a winning autocorrect - made me laugh!
Bounce of the sausage.. must be bbqing in the nick!
Hold on.. let me get this straight..
Are you saying you were paid $3 to go on a “short date”, during which someone “cooked a sausage” in your rear end, but it was a bit painful because you didn’t use the right amount of “oil” and the “sausage” was bouncy?
Tell me more…
d'oh was just doing a shop recently but I tend only skim their otherwise expensive meat section.
the finest of fine
the best of the worst
They had a few at Ed Square
What inflation on food?
On this note , can anybody recommend a good starter BBQ at $300 or less?
Grab a cheapie from Bunnings?
How big do you need? Would a small Weber Q fit into that budget? We have a Q200 we bought 15 years ago and it works perfectly.
Weber baby q. On sale under $300 occasionally. Was $271 at David Jones two weeks ago.
jumbuq 4 burner from bunnings
occasionally bigger ones will have $100 off
Gas or charcoal.
Bunnings $85 jumbuck mini spit roaster is good for a small beginner charcoal bbq.
There’s a Facebook page that you could get tips and tricks for it as well.
Gas I have no idea.
You can either vraby a Weber q when on special.
They are great little BBQs but lack a hot plate and smokey factor. Most accessories for them are also expensively prices.
I would personally grab a cheap gas bbq and a jumbuck mini spit. ($84.90)
check thhe FB marketplace or a cheapy from Bunnings for $115 (usually goes on special for $90 odd)
Max. $199.90 and u have a snag burner + a charcoal grill + a rotisserie. = great value.
I've been thru a bbq obsession and found half of bbqing is the taste/flavour and the other half is the atmosphere and theatrics of it all.
drinking beer in the vicinity of rotating meat over charcoal is hard to beat. Hooded BBQs and smokers lose that atmosphere a bit….
https://www.bunnings.com.au/jumbuck-novo-small-charcoal-spit…
The marketplace usually has gas BBQs for free or $50.
I've seen heaps of BBQs for free that were originally $1,000-$2,000 brand new.
Fellow meat eaters.
So… normal people.
Is a faulty p xel normal? Common, maybe — but not normal. Don’t be a back in the ass
AFFIRM!
The strong eat,
the weak are meat
Thanks OP my local coles had stock. Luckily they had the listed price in store at $10 so they didn't sell out. They scanned at $5 though.
Hell that is damn good value. Hope there is some left when I get there.. :)
These are always so grissley. These and woolies black label or whatever they call them… rubbish quality sold as “premium”.
Agree 100% The Cole's premium are very average.
Although I generally prefer beef sausages, I like the Three Aussie Farmers range of snags. Heaps of flavour and a nice consistency. Plus they are cheaper than Cole's Premium.
Are these sausages or what? Judging by the the title it's Angus beef, but that could mean anything.
2 coarse ground brisket burgers
4 garlic and parsley sausages
$7.14/kg not bad
Looks pretty good for the price, I might pick some up tomorrow.
Should cook up nicely on the BBQ and the smell will piss off my annoying vegan neighbours which is always bonus! 😉
Make sure you cook them outside when the wind is blowing toward your neighbours. And perhaps get a second pack just for cooking until they disintegrate completely carbon black.
Those vegans love it.
I took the skin off the saisages and rolled them in puff pastry. A bit of egg brushed on the top and into the air fryer. Was pretty good
Could also take the skin off the snags and mash the patties and make a big batch of rissoles or any dish really that you start with mince
Sold out at one store, but another had mislabelled them at $10 and there were plenty.
My store is sold out. I hope they restock tomorrow.
I asked my local store while I was there and was told is a discontinued / removed item so wouldn’t be restocked.
Oooo bbq Sunday perhaps
Coles website is down. Ozbargain DDOS?
I'm ozbargainer first and vegetarian second.
At this price, I'm going to eat 2 packs!
There is no good reason why you have to be vegetarian every day of the week.
Apart from reducing co2 emissions and water wastage right?? 😂
water wastage right
Doesn't veggies drink lots of water??
@LFO: The water footprint per calorie for meat is much higher than for vegetables, particularly beef. Your livestock need to eat (and drink), and what they eat requires a lot of water.
https://www.theplantway.com/water-food-calories/
I eat meat, and understand with how many people we have on this planet, it's not sustainable to eat the way many of us in developed countries do. Either we make the transition on our terms (having good alternatives, reducing how much we're eating, etc.) or nature will force it and you will not enjoy being forced.
what they eat requires a lot of water.
Quality beef is fed by grazing natural pastures, natural pastures use natural, precipitated rain water that will otherwise evaporate.
Cheap, as in low quality meat is grain(or whatever)fed made by who knows what alchemy; not the same.
us in developed countries
Funny thing is that "primitive" country lifestyle in "non-developed" nations have a diet where meat is prevalent, being cattle of different breeds and not necessarily beef but others like sheep, chicken, pork, goat, rabbit, birds, etc etc etc etc; even horse, cats, dogs and large rats.
Other than those doing for religious reasons (Hindus AFIK) most civilizations understood the need to consume meat as well as vegetables.
For a reason we are omnivorous, by design, born with dentures to consume meat and greenery.
@kwchaz: " it's not sustainable to eat the way many of us in developed countries do"
Oh really??
What humanity has been doing for thousands of years is not sustainable???
Only in a fevered leftie/warmunist's mind.
cows drink water too
And fish drink a lot more water depleting oxygen from it as well ;-)
@LFO: Eat more fish cos they drain our oxygen you're saying?
Or you just being stupid haha?
Person I replied to says there's no good reason why we should become vegetarian - actually that's factually incorrect.
The argument "you should eat meat because it's natural" is poor. Many humans have existed naturally without eating meat. Also, is farming cows to this extent, "by design"?
Do you really think people even pay for the $5/kg+ for free range beef? Most cows are not raised on native pasture.
In Australia, very few of us have necessity to eat meat, many eat it because they like it and want to. People should just admit that rather than hide behind filmsy reasoning such as "we were born to" or denying the legitimacy of vegetarianism.
When people eat meat out of necessity, it's a totally different ballpark. They cherish the animal, they raise it from child to adult. Can many omnivores say the same here?
I'm a meat eater by choice btw.
there's no good reason why we should become vegetarian - actually that's factually incorrect.
Now that is actually:
just being stupid
.
I'm a meat eater by choice btw.
WOT? No need to eat but you eat … good reasons not to eat but you eat … wot?
Please, just focus.
@LFO: There are good reasons to eat meat
There plenty of good reasons to be vegetarian
Majority of meat eaters need to admit they do it because they like it and it's easy - not because it's natural or necessary. They don't have many grounds on which to refute vegetarianism.
Kinda simple no?
not because it's natural or necessary
Well, eating, to get nutrients, is a real necessity.
Choosing to eat a large amount of vegetables or a small amount of meat to satisfy such needs is a choice.
None is better than the other.
NONE
Well, eating, to get nutrients, is a real necessity.
Absolutely. Cept you can get all nutrients from non-meat alternatives. The only people that need to eat meat are those with health conditions.
Eating plant-based is cheaper. Eating red meat is linked with higher levels of obesity and shorter life span. As well as creating a huge amount of waste and emissions. Plant-based diets are better for the environment and for your health - scientifically proven. So in that case, it is better.
None is better than the other.
Didn't you just state we should eat meat by design, implying it's better to eat meat, because we are designed to?
The only people that need to eat meat are those with health conditions.
Eating plant-based is cheaper.
Eating red meat is linked with higher levels of obesity and shorter life span. As well as creating a huge amount of waste and emissions.
Plant-based diets are better for the environment and for your health - scientifically proven.
Sorry, that is the vegetarian mantra and is neither solid nor "proven".
However, I happily agree to disagree.
Didn't you just state we should eat meat by design, implying it's better to eat meat, because we are designed to?
No. I stated there is nothing wrong with eating meat. To the point we are design to consume meat and vegetables.
Like human reproduction: an instinct that (almost) rules (most of) our lives.
But you don't have to necessarily copulate and reproduce to live. Up to the individual.
Like eating meat.
Without being told how bad it supposedly is..
Like eating meat.
Without being told how bad it supposedly is..
Imagine being vegetarian lmao, it's always meat eaters that feel the need to "correct" vegetarians
Vegetarian mantra with merit and scientific backing.
Here are a few articles run by doctors, scientists, dietitians.
1, 2
Of course, correlation-based, but sounds… solid.
"Apart from reducing co2 emissions"
BOOGA BOOGA
i want MORE emisions of colourless, odourless trace gas (0.04%), plant food CO2 … so does plant life.
FYI: Plant life dies off with CO2 at less than 150ppm.
Humanity has come perilously close to this level.
To the consternation of global warming proponents, the Late Ordovician Period was also an Ice Age while at the same time CO2 concentrations then were nearly 12 times higher than today— 4400 ppm. According to greenhouse theory, Earth should have been exceedingly hot. Instead, global temperatures were no warmer than today. Clearly, other factors besides atmospheric carbon influence earth temperatures and global warming.
@Gekov: To reply, I'm just going to follow simple logical reasoning. If you need sources, I'll provide.
Global temperatures have increased, this is FACT. It's now considerably hotter than… the ice age?
It's been 40 years since the 1970s?? Even if scientists didn't know what caused climate change, they have been taking photos of Arctic ice recessing!
You want more plant life, okay. Consider that plants have plenty CO2 going around because we bulldoze 10,000 year old forests, to plant short little wheat farms, don't worry, they're not starving.
I don't think a website labelled as "real climate science" sounds legitimate, do you?
@dengziyi: "Global temperatures have increased, this is FACT. It's now considerably hotter than… the ice age?"
As they did during the the Mediæval Warm Period … what's your point?
HUH? How can this be??
0.6ºC global warming 1900-1945 explained by natural variation BUT 0.8ºC warming 1975-2020 cannot be explained by natural variation????
By the way, global warming over the last 30 years is 0.1ºC! Shocking eh?
February 5, 2022: A DAY WITHOUT GLOBAL WARMING – ZERO POINT ZERO …
Using a baseline of 1979-2000, the global temperature anomaly on Saturday was… ZERO POINT ZERO!
“Not the net-zero they were looking for”
https://wattsupwiththat.com/2022/02/07/february-5-2022-a-day…
ALSO …
0.03ºC GLOBAL WARMING SINCE 1979? … OMG WE’RE ALL GOING TO DIE!
UAH Global Temperature Update for January, 2022: +0.03ºC relative to its 1991-2020 baseline period
February 2nd, 2022 by Roy W. Spencer, Ph. D.
The Version 6.0 global average lower tropospheric temperature (LT) anomaly for January, 2022 was +0.03 deg. C, down from the December, 2021 value of +0.21 deg. C.
https://wattsupwiththat.com/2022/02/03/uah-global-temperatur…
AND MORE HORRIFYING NEWS
… IT’S A CLIMATE EMERGENCY I TELLS YA!
Average global temperature has risen a massive, terrifying, unprecedented, 1ºC over the last 150 years, making that a staggering 1/7000th of a degree Celsius per year on year!!!
We’re all doomed!!!
"plants have plenty CO2 going around because we bulldoze 10,000 year old forests, to plant short little wheat farms, don't worry, they're not starving."
Compared to historical levels of CO2 the're STARVING!
I don't think a website labelled as "DESMOGBLOG" sounds legitimate, do you?
@Gekov: Article stating "plants will not die to CO2 starvation, but rising temps".
I'll talk on Dr. Roy Spencer, he's actually not a climate change denier. He believes the model currently presented in mainstream climate change media is too exaggerated, he believes climate change exists.
This is the link to his actual article, your link conveniently leaves out other information. "+0.12 C/decade over the global-averaged oceans, and +0.18 C/decade over global-averaged land".
That is BEST CASE scenario in climate modelling for business as usual. He is going against almost all mainstream projections of climate change
@dengziyi: "other information. "+0.12 C/decade over the global-averaged oceans, and +0.18 C/decade over global-averaged land".
This warming is likley due to the satellite record starting during PEAK GLOBAL COOLING circa 1979.
Wonder why leftie/warmunists want to censor him?
LEFTY CLIMATE ACTIVISTS WANT TO CENSOR INCONVENIENT, BUT TRUE, GLOBAL TEMPERATURE DATA
… THEY DON’T WANT YOU TO KNOW THAT THERE AIN’T MUCH GLOBAL WARMING!
DR ROY SPENCER: “GOOGLE PUNISHED ME FOR REPORTING THE REAL GLOBAL TEMPERATURE”
AS OPPOSED TO THE HIGHLY TAMPERED, WARMED UP, DATA FROM ALTERNATIVE DATABASES.
The Version 6.0 global average lower tropospheric temperature anomaly for January, 2022 was +0.03ºC
His UNTAMPERED satellite data shows virtually NO GLOBAL WARMING SINCE 1979!
Dr Roy Spencer runs the world's most authoritative measurement of the world's temperature, using NASA satellites.
Google has now demonetised his website, where he reports the results.
It accuses him of spreading "harmful" news - which is that the planet is not warming anything like as fast as predicted.
Here he speaks on The Bolt Report.
Social media giants are increasingly censoring debate
- and now Google is punishing one of the world's top climate experts.
Professor Roy Spencer runs one of the five big measurements of world temperature, some say the most authoritative, at the University of Alabama at Huntsville.
His work has been widely cited in the scientific literature and has won him the American Meteorological Society's Special Award.
Here's the problem …
Spencer’s latest measurements for January again confirm the planet isn't warming anything as fast as predicted by climate models.
It shows virtually no warming over the 30-year average – just 0.03ºC above that average.
That kind of data has outraged some activists.
They’ve complained to Google, which has now told Spencer it will demonetise his website because he has allegedly been making “unreliable and harmful claims”.
This means Spencer cannot earn money from ads placed on his website by Google’s AdSense program.
Without an accurate satellite record to limit climate activist data tampering, “adjusted” surface temperatures would fit alarmist predictions & we’d all now be carbon traders under a UN world government.
VIDEO OF THE INTERVIEW …
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=CZy8mgD05QA
https://www.drroyspencer.com/
https://www.heraldsun.com.au/blogs/andrew-bolt/roy-spencer-o…
@Gekov: You're using his work wrong. the 0.03C number is regarding the variance of the upwards trend of a warming Earth.
"The linear warming trend since January, 1979 now stands at +0.13 C/decade "
Therefore, since 1979, by Spencer's model, Earth's temperature has increased by 0.5 C
I really don't care if Spencer's been shunned or whatever. He believes in creationism.
@dengziyi: "he 0.03C number is regarding the variance of the upwards trend of a warming Earth."
HUH?
The 0.03ºC is an anomaly over a HORIZONTAL (NON-WARMING) level going back to 1979… NOT over a rising trend line.
Look at any historical temperature chart and you will see that the anomalies are referred to a HORIZONTAL LINE!
Thus the 0.03ºC is the net warming since 1979.
An anomaly over a rising trend line???? You can't be serious.
How you get that 0.5ºC is DEAD WRONG but to be expected from a leftie/warmunist used to distorting facts.
because we bulldoze 10,000 year old forests, to plant short little wheat farms
Priceless !!!!!
@LFO: "because we bulldoze 10,000 year old forests, to plant short little wheat farms"
because we bulldoze 10,000 year old forests, to plant HUGE wind & solar farms
"reducing co2 emissions"
Got it!
Scientists don’t know what caused 1920 to 1940 Arctic warming, and they don’t know what caused 1940 to 1980 cooling, but they totally know that CO2 caused post-1970’s warming.
"reducing co2 emissions"
That would be catastrophic!
Earth Currently Suffering From CO2 STARVATION!
We missed out on CATASTROPHIC CO2 DEPLETION to the 150ppm plant extinction level by a whisker
Saved by modern industrial emissions!
"educing co2 emissions"
What would the weather/climate be like if we could regress atmospheric CO2 levels from the current 400ppm back to 300ppm?
Glad you asked.
Here is the answer in this video …
https://realclimatescience.com/2022/02/digital-hate-climate-…
Relevant section starts at about 4 minutes into the video.
"reducing co2 emissions"
CO2 Starvation:
600 Million Years Of Data Reveals Current CO2 Starvation Levels.
Just Above A Mass Extinction Level Of 150ppm When Plant Growth Shuts Down
This made me hungry.
It looks interesting but a documentary is going to have its own view.
And what was the lie?
Yum Yum
It's in NSW too. Couldn't believe how good the value is myself. Wonder if it's a permanent thing.