Complimentary 5-Year/75,000km Service with Purchase of MY25 Jaecoo J7, J7 SHS, J8 Models @ Jaecoo

540

Extended for one more month!

This end-of-financial-year, receive 5 Year/75,000km Complimentary Service^ when you purchase a JAECOO. This offer is available on all MY25 models, including the J7, J7 SHS, and J8. Book a test drive today or visit your preferred dealer to take advantage of this offer. Ends June 30.

T&Cs apply. While stocks last.

https://youtu.be/RaC4qsIN2nw?si=ohBbPQWJUvpahygu

https://youtu.be/8DdOKp2FMZI?si=vQQzmng-V1_33TFP

Adding couple of reviews from carexpert for their J7.

Terms

Offer available at participating dealers on the Jaecoo J7 and Jaecoo J8 onsold demonstrator stock vehicles purchased and delivered between 14/06/2025 and 30/06/2025. While stocks last. Complimentary factory standard scheduled servicing for 5 years from the date of purchase or the first 75,000 kms (whichever occurs first), as per Jaecoo’s recommended service intervals and otherwise in accordance with the terms specified in the vehicle’s manufacturer service book. It is the customer’s responsibility to present their vehicle to a participating Jaecoo dealer for the complimentary scheduled servicing at each of the service intervals. Scheduled servicing excludes wear and tear items and additional work or components required that are not set out in the vehicle’s manufacturer service book. Not redeemable for cash. Not available to fleet, government or rental buyers, or with any other offers. Not available in conjunction with any other offer. Jaecoo Motor Australia reserves the right to modify or withdraw this offer in its sole discretion.

Related Stores

Jaecoo
Jaecoo

Comments

  • +18

    Here I was thinking it was a caravan!

    • I wouldn't be surprised if the workers building this in China are treated better and have lower turnover.

    • Chrysler stopped making those for some reason.

  • +6

    A lot of nice looking car for 34k… #NoChinaOpinion

    • +12

      Range rover evoque clone by the looks of it

      Edit: oh wait it IS a deliberate clone. Lol makes sense.

      • Always thought the 2 door Evoque was nice looking.

      • +12

        Temu Range Rover.

        • +24

          Possibly more reliable

  • While Stocks last.

  • +3

    Weak EOFY promotion

    • +4

      5yrs servicing not bad though. Whats the big brands offering?

        • What?!!??

          T&C's:

          Complimentary factory standard scheduled servicing for 5 years from the date of purchase or the first 75,000 kms (whichever occurs first).

      • +2

        About $1,700 of value. Decent but not mind blowing.

      • I had 5yrs scheduled servicing thrown in without haggling or negotiation for a new VW T-Roc bought this weekend, valued at $3.5k.

        • +3

          More like overvalued at $3.5K. That's $700 per service for a VW. Considering most of those services are just an oil and filter change + general inspection, that is crazy money for servicing.

  • +7

    Great looking car but not keen on the massive screen on the entertainment system plus no physical buttons to control things like climate control.

  • +1

    Is this 5 years servicing for free of the 5th year service for free?

    • +2

      Complimentary factory standard scheduled servicing for 5 years from the date of purchase or the first 75,000 kms (whichever occurs first)

  • +4

    You are the reason that I breathe
    (Jaecoo) You are the reason that I still believe
    (Jaecoo) You are my destiny
    Jaecoo Oh-oh-oh

  • +1

    Looks good and a good amount of value for the price

    I will say 75,000km warrenty is a bit concerning…i mean if you going to a KM limit 5 year warranty i would expect it to be 150,000km

    However if your happy with a Chinese car this seems like a good deal

    • 15,000km is above the average driven per year for most Australians. It’s probably fine for most people.

      • Look that's fair enough

        'Using the average' might not be the target market - most of these cars would be for people who drive out to the country/beach/camping they would would likely do well above the average as they seem to be targeted the young couples and families with budget friendly SUVs

        Possibly even older retired couples looking for a car to spend there twilight years travelling Australia

        It isnt a deal breaker for the price but it is worth noting

        If you just want a car to get you from A-to-B for work and social gatherings 75,000km is plenty i agree

        I will say this Land Rovers (which these seem to be modelled off) are ultra expensive and notoriously shit cars - ie expensive parts, services, repairs etc if you ask me Land Rovers are the 'worst' value for money cars in the road

        It would not be hard to mirror there product with better quality and durability which i reckon they might have done here but don't-fully' truth the product in the Aus market yet

    • +3

      It's an 8-year unlimited kilometer warranty. It's complimentary service that they're offering for the first 75,000km.

      • +1

        Oh i misread that then that is a fantastic deal lol

        Im considering buying one!!!

  • +6

    Are they still be around in 5 years time?

    • +14

      Appropriate question given the intense cannabilism among Chinese car companies. Out of the hundred plus car companies there, only a couple make any money at all. Even worse they only make money because of abusive business dealings with local suppliers. Driving genuinely good companies out of business. There's going to be major Chinese car industry contraction no matter what anyone does. Their government cannot come in and save the day anymore.

      All without even mentioning the massive oversupply issues and price wars. Making any buying a chinese cars feel like a sucker when it's much cheaper only months down the line. Especially within China. I'd say this will happen over here, too. The price war has already pushed Tesla's prices down here.

      • +6

        Couldn't agree more. Bought Geely EX5 Inspire for the full price of $48.5k d/a. No dealer wanted to drop the price. Motorscout came with an offer higher than RRP. Just 2 months later and there are reports of people buying the same car for $44k d/a. I feel like a total loser.

    • -3

      Will you?

    • +3

      Could ask that of nissan, honda and possibly subaru

      • +1

        The difference with them though is even if they left Australia, spare parts distribution and servicing know-how are already established.

        For these new brands, parts availability is still a big concern with huge wait times. Not just from China either, Mahindra (India) is also pretty lacking.

        • Id firmly back Mahindra before Nissan Honda or Subaru. They’ve been around for something like 80 years

  • +2

    Something very very very interesting here to consider.
    Their Future price promise is very interesting topic.
    Apparently it doesn't tie with finance offer.
    I cannot find T&Cs and value for it but if the value is strong, another good reason to buy especially you are upgrading every 3-4 years( most guaranteed future value is 2-4 yrs). Either sell privately to get more or worth nothing, just sell back to the manufacturer with promisedbuyback. (If future market is flooded with solid state battery cars.)
    Looking to find out more tomorrow

    • +3

      Very interesting. Post when you know more

  • +2

    I've personally driven and I loved it except a little glitch to start Android Auto once. Otherwise it's a value for money I believe.

    • That glitch could be some serious foreshadowing in software though. Chinese has yet to do well on any software that I've seen.

    • +2

      That's just the back-end ccp software loading.up

  • -6

    Why are we flooding the market with so many koochie koos? I think 2 or 3 double happiness is enough but instead we get the likes of pagodas, sinsieths and Kowloon all coming in

    • +6

      More the merrier!. Makes the mainstream players a little more honest in their offerings. For far too long we have had higher pricing and cheaper interior options compared to what is offered in US/Europe .

      • 100%

  • has anyone driven this? looks the goods but seems like a big punt

    • +6

      I'll save you the time. If you ask for advice here on a Chinese car brand, ask you're going to get is boomers saying Chinese cars are shit and copycats.

      • -2

        Many have been and many still are. It's not some secret. If you really wanted to save him some time help out with recommendations of favourable models.

    • +4

      I've driven both.
      The j8 is kinda odd because it's a 5 seater at about the size of a 7 seater.
      The j7 felt a little small for my fam. I felt I could reach the passenger door too easily from the driver seat.
      The tech is everywhere in the car, more features than any of the major brands, BUT too much in my opinion. Very intrusive on your drive (can turn them off manually but have to do it every time).
      No manual controls was a turn off, no pun.
      Every part of these cars is from something else, down to the Mercedes gear select on the j8.
      A lot of car for the cash, but not without teething issues.

      • thanks. sounds like every other chinese car, lots of tech but intrusive ADAS. how's the handling? suspension and car roll seems to be a common issue

        • +1

          Yea that's it. Lots of cool features outside of ADAS though, that you don't find in lower end Mazda's, for example.
          I wasn't exactly attempting to drive it like a supercar, but the body roll probably was a little more than I'd imagine. Nothing crazy though.

      • -2

        Lol @ you having wasted time driving BOTH

  • -3

    Chinese car brands lol

  • I have heard some Chinese car manufactures and component makers might have questionable labour practices. Does anyone know if that's true?

    • 15 year olds carrying a 700 kilos battery from one end to the other, which in Australia the same labour practice would just be a slap on the wrist and please don't do that again. No jail time guaranteed by law.

      • Clearly they need to rip those superboys out of the factory, and ready them for the next olympics!… and you reckon there's more than 1 of them that can carry a 700 kg battery!
        Would it be steroids you reckon?
        ahem

    • Yes, built by forced labour of minorities

    • Chinese state-owned mining and investment companies routinely engage in debt trap diplomacy in African nations. Trading loans for infrastructure, with mining rights for natural resources.

      • -3

        Or the other option is to first destroy those countries and steal their minerals like the way the West have done it over the centuries.

        • Disliking both scenarios is an option y'know. I will never dispute that the West has had its fair share of mistreatment towards developing countries. No need to engage in whataboutism, it's a weak argument.

          The difference is we are talking about what's occurring in the present day. It's a bit like slavery. People stopped talking about it when the West stopped doing it, but it still happens in the Middle East. And it barely gets the backlash it deserves.

          If we want to make change for the better, focussing on past failures is a lesson. Focussing on current failures is an opportunity for change.

    • It’s not like EU company ethics are exactly squeaky clean

  • +1

    Purchase a what?

  • -5

    75,000km warranty… That's not good.

    • +5

      It's an 8-year unlimited kilometer warranty. They're offering complimentary service for the first 75,000km.

  • +1

    I used to be across all the auto brands but 2025 is the year I put up the white flag

  • -6

    jesus these will be worth nothing in 5 years anyway

    • +10

      Yeah, I've been hearing this about Haval. After years of waiting for a bargain second hand Haval Jolion, I gave up and bought something else. 3 year old Haval Jolions are cheaper by only 4-5k compared to new. No 50-70% off like promised here on OzB.

    • +3

      where do I sign up for a free car in 5 years?

  • -8

    Vanakam வணக்கம் Mahindra also has some specials going…any takers?
    and soon sa wa dee cups สวัสดีครับ will have a few ev coming your way too.

  • +1

    Where on earth are these brands popping up? They sound like AliExpress brands.

    • There's like 150+ Chinese car brands no ones ever even heard of

  • +1

    When is the great Aussie brand coming?

    • It is coming. Once we become a state of America

  • +1

    Ends June 30.

    Practically over by the time this deal was posted

    Anyway, $35k DA for a Chinese petrol SUV… a hell no!

  • +3

    Really cool that we don't make cars in Australia any more, but are happy to sell China cheap coal so they can have a thriving complex economy.

  • Anone owns this can share if its good or not?

  • Cool that we abandoned the manufacturing sector? Because losing cars was a domino effect on a series of other industries, that needed the auto manufacturing work as part of their revenues.
    I can understand people agreeing with it, but thinking it was cool is another step again.
    Given that leaves australia pretty much with a service industry, an agricultural industry, and a raw mineral export industry….. do you reckon we're still spreading our efforts too broadly?

    • +2

      why would we insist on making something we are not good at and don't have a competitive advantage in? it just means the industry lives on government subsidies when the same money should be spent on creating jobs in other industries that are future proof and on fields we have an edge in. although we all know they will throw it away on buying "concepts of a submarine"

  • -1

    Australia was very good at making cars in the end… the competitive advantage on a level playing field was a thing of market volume (and tariff protection) and the obvious labour costs that apply to any activity in australia involving employment.

    The industry subsidy was a way of getting around not having tariffs due to free trade agreements…… that many/most countries in the world DO have to protect various industries. The australian auto market is now one of the least restricted in the world, with a relatively very large number of makes and models of vehicles being marketed.
    (what is not so obvious to most consumers is the horrendous parts cost result of buying a vehicle with a low market volume…. with results like $3K+ for a single headlight assembly)
    What other industry had money spent on it to create jobs? I presume you are OK with industry subsidies… just not for cars.

    Future proof? I suggest nothing is future proof unless you have a time machine.
    I dunno what you mean about "buying concepts of a submarine"… my best guess is you are being critical of the thought of part manufacturing subs here.

    • +2

      Australia was very good at making cars in the end… the competitive advantage on a level playing field was a thing of market volume (and tariff protection) and the obvious labour costs that apply to any activity in australia involving employment.

      if you can't achieve economies of scale, it means we aren't good at it. building a beautiful machine for 3x what it would cost in thailand isn't being "good at it." it sounds like you are emotionally invested in having a domestic car industry. the question you should ask yourself is why.

      Future proof? I suggest nothing is future proof unless you have a time machine.

      doesn't take a genius to know where the future is going. services, machine learning AI and data science, health, personal care, renewable energy etc etc.

  • -1

    @ MAY4th
    I'll accept your view that a great product can be defined as "not good at it"… your view but not mine. How many countries do you think have no trade barriers to vehicles from thailand?
    Nope, I'm not at all emotionally invested in australia having a manufacturing industry, so I don't need to self examine on that. My raising the issue was in response to another poster saying "it's really cool that australia doesn't have a car industry".

    You have already read my response
    "Cool that we abandoned the manufacturing sector? Because losing cars was a domino effect on a series of other industries, that needed the auto manufacturing work as part of their revenues. I can understand people agreeing with it, but thinking it was cool is another step again."

    Your indication of where you reckon the the future is going primarily revolves around the service sector…. which I agree is very significant.

    The problem is that if australia ever has an economic hiccup by not being able to rely on mineral exports, we're stuffed. A service sector just catering to australians won't be economically possible without external funds… in this case from the mining industry. We do earn a bit from educational tourists… a bit from recreational tourists… have a fast growing net deficit on call centres, and I'd suggest not very much from "AI and data science, renewable energy etc etc. I reckon those are big net deficits on the australian trade balance. Where are all the solar panels, solar electronics control systems, batteries, wind turbines etc coming from? Not australia.

    Agriculture, while significant, would not compensate for a fading of mineral export wealth.

    Before mining became such a financially significant earner, australia had a lot of manufacturing. We were close to being able to be self sufficient (obviously at a lower efficency and thus lower standard of living). Opening up the textile, clothing and footwear industries put many thousands of people out of work but made a lot of things much cheaper. Similarly with local electronics industries (tvs and radios etc), whitegoods, steelworks, shipbuilding, and ultimately a huge part of the australian
    manufacturing industry after the auto industry.

    Britain is an example of a nation struggling with the new world economy, where their mining and manufacturing industry has close to disappeared. But for our minerals, australia would be seeing similar massive social disharmony and disintegration.

    Trump's naive MAGA strategies have great social appeal (well… the ones about growing industry), but it's hard to see any significant likely change to the overall growth/disintegration of american manufacturing. Tariffs could assist select key areas to grow (but only with long term planning and goals that investors might be attracted to)… but definitely not with trump's incredibly ADHT strategies.

    My bottom line is I'm not wailing about the loss of manufacturing in australia, but I do think it's unfortunate. I'm not saying there was/is any way to keep it here…. but the social cost of its loss should be clear for anyone to see… massive unemployment in certain sectors and areas which create a methamania of social problems. Will australia have its own detroit urban and social wasteland in the near future?

    • +1

      I agree Australia has a very imbalanced economy, and where money should be invested is beyond the scope of a couple of ozb posts. I also don't think the demise of the car industry has as significant of a social cost compared to the US - these jobs went elsewhere, our labour market is as strong as ever with unemployment near all time lows

  • -1

    Yep, it's complex.
    As a parthian shot I'll say it wasn't the car industry we lost… that took out the viability of a lot of associated manufacturing industry.
    As time goes by I think australia's (self- as in to its own population) service industry has grown significantly, but a lot of employment that used to be semi skilled life long manufacturing jobs has been replaced by unskilled fast food preparation/serving/delivery, uber driving, and ad hoc casual work etc…that both carry a lot less personal reward, and don't lessen our need to import goods.
    If australia can't sell a lot of stuff to overseas buyers, to offset the huge lot of stuff australia buys from overseas…. things in australia will go quiet and dark. The less australia makes here, the more it buys.
    Adios and cheers.

  • The car's name is so not cool lol

  • +1

    Thanks for posting OP. While it is too late to start looking into this car today on 30/6 to get the complimentary servicing, you have introduced me to a new brand that seems to have great reviews and is very reasonably priced. I look forward to checking it out in person and comparing to the Chery vehicles i have recently looked at. :-)

    • I'm tossing up between Jaecoo J7 or Cherry Tiggo 7. Both cars have got their good and points. It's a hard decision

      • I haven't seen the Jaecoo yet but I was pretty impressed with the Chery Tiggo 4. Much bigger than I thought for a 'small' SUV. Once you decide I would love to know which one you end up purchasing and what got you over the edge on that car. Thanks.

      • +1

        @FrankTT Just saw Jaecoo servicing offer has been extended to end of July. Chery didn't have any offers so something else to consider in your decision.

        • +1

          Cheers mate, plan to do a test drive on them both soon and then hopefully a price drop happens in the coming months

  • I am worried in 5 years and 100,000km, will anyone buy my Jaecoo?

  • +1

    Hey @AnirudhD. It seems offer extended for another month as I just saw this on the link you provided are you able to unmark as 'Expired' and put new end date?

    July Offer
    Receive 5 Year/75,000km Complimentary Service^ when you purchase a JAECOO. This offer is available on all MY25 models, including the J7, J7 SHS, and J8. Book a test drive today or visit your preferred dealer to take advantage of this offer.

    T&Cs apply. While stocks last. Ends July 31.

Login or Join to leave a comment