This was posted 3 months 19 days ago, and might be an out-dated deal.

Related
  • expired

[WA] Tesla Model Y RWD (2024) Existing Inventory: $51,100 Delivered + On-Road Costs @Tesla

20410
[WA] Tesla Model Y RWD (2024) Existing Inventory: $51,100 Delivered + On-Road Costs @Tesla
Go to Deal
LInPerth on 28/02/2025 - 01:10 tesla.com (6149 clicks)
Last edited 01/03/2025 - 06:47 by 2 other users

This looks like an inventory clearance price for Model Y MY2024 manufactured around August to September 2024.

It's $2,000 further cheaper than previous $53,300 inventory discount price from initial inventory sale https://www.ozbargain.com.au/node/888355.

Stock only available in WA and there is $350 discount if you use a referral link.

Besides, WA ZEV Rebate for $3,500 (apply separately after you get a qualified vehicle) available until 10th of May 2025. It is like refund stamp duty for the EV registration.

Save further if you can get novated lease on it as it does not attract any FBT.

The $51,100 model sold out in half a day as per comment from whom visited the store.

Other Model Y existing inventory in WA

Referral Links

Referral: random (817)

Referee gets $350 off Model Y & 3 purchase.

Referrer gets $150 credit toward Supercharging, software upgrades, merchandise, service payments or a new vehicle. Limit of 10 referral benefits per calendar year.

Automotive Car SUV Tesla Inc Electric Vehicle

Related Stores

Tesla
Tesla

closed Comments

      • Caped Baldy on 28/02/2025 - 13:56

        Isn't the USA's war on drugs an excuse to imprison minorities and use them as prison labour?

        They've also got one of the highest per capita incarceration rates.

        https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/List_of_countries_by_incarcera…

        • 1st-Amendment on 01/03/2025 - 14:13
          -1

          Isn't the USA's war on drugs an excuse to imprison minorities and use them as prison labour?

          Yes! You've cracked it!

          The US government convinces all the minorities to go out rape and murder people, beat their wives, molest children etc, then arrests them to use as prison labour. And the minorities obey with this because… reasons? I see no problem with that theory whatsoever…

          They've also got one of the highest per capita incarceration rates.

          And? Do you think people who commit crimes shouldn't go to jail? Let me know how many rapists or murderers you'd like to relocate to your neighbourhood…

    • prodrome on 28/02/2025 - 07:29
      +3

      Musk is an unelected Nazi who directly caused hundreds of African babies to contract AIDS by illegally shutting US foreign aid (for example). He is a danger to democracy and the western world.

      China is a country and evil dictatorship. We trade with China to spread democracy.

      That said, this is a shopping website. They both make crap cars. Buy a European or Japanese car instead.

      • Aureus on 28/02/2025 - 07:45
        +2

        China makes crap EVs…? Lol get your head out of the sand.

        • prodrome on 28/02/2025 - 08:52

          The BYD is unusually good.

          I'm biased because I've owned American or Chinese cars before and they fell apart.

      • Pdubes on 28/02/2025 - 08:21
        +2

        How did Elon make African babies contract aids exactly? By preventing babies to have protected sex? Stopping the flow of condoms to babies? Are you insane?

        • prodrome on 28/02/2025 - 08:45

          No, I am not insane. I am an Aerospace Engineer, unlike Musk.

          I don't know how you avoid the news. I wish I could.

          Babies born to people with HIV need to receive HIV medicines straight after birth to prevent HIV transmission. Musk's first Dog act was to shutdown the clinics in Africa, giving a death sentence to hundreds of babies.

          He also shut down fighting an Ebola outbreak and lied about it.

          • Pdubes on 28/02/2025 - 09:10
            -2

            @prodrome: Gotcha yes Elon is evil. Your last statement that Tesla is a crap car or the Chinese cars are crap is juvenile though.

            • prodrome on 28/02/2025 - 09:26
              -1

              @Pdubes: Chinese cars have been falling apart on Australian roads for 10+ years. The BYD is strangely doing better, but utter garbage like MGs may as well be a Chery J11.

          • 1st-Amendment on 28/02/2025 - 11:54
            +2

            @prodrome:

            No, I am not insane.

            Your comments say otherwise.

          • Mark365 on 01/03/2025 - 03:23

            @prodrome: Yeah unlike Musk, u r not a billionaire, thats why u r here looking for a bargain.

        • aussiecageman on 28/02/2025 - 08:52
          +2

          HIV is not always transmitted through sex. Aids is the disease caused by HIV. One can be HIV positive and while being treated not transmit HIV to a child.

          https://www.betterhealth.vic.gov.au/health/conditionsandtrea…

        • Matt88 on 28/02/2025 - 09:26
          +1

          Elon/Trump cut funding to USAID which in turn stopped the babies born with HIV from receiving medicine that prevents them from developing full blown aids.

          • 1st-Amendment on 28/02/2025 - 11:57
            +1

            @Matt88:

            which in turn stopped the babies born with HIV from receiving medicine that prevents them from developing full blown aids.

            So why don't you donate your salary to helping them? By not doing that you are equally guilty.
            Why do all the grand plans of the Left require them to spend $Other_People's_Money?

            • prodrome on 28/02/2025 - 13:46

              @1st-Amendment: You aren't very bright are you.

              The US spent money a small amount on foreign aid to further their own interests.

              • 1st-Amendment on 28/02/2025 - 14:55

                @prodrome:

                The US spent money a small amount on foreign aid to further their own interests.

                You forgot to say how this conflicts with anything I said…

            • Autonomic on 28/02/2025 - 17:28

              @1st-Amendment: I guess the "left" is about helping regular people. The "right" is about kissing the feet of billionaires who only want more money.

              • 1st-Amendment on 28/02/2025 - 17:46

                @Autonomic:

                I guess the "left" is about helping regular people. The "right" is about kissing the feet of billionaires who only want more money.

                Well that is the cartoon view of the world that almost all Leftists seem to fall for.

                Let me see if we can open up that mind a little.
                Jeff Bezos is billionaire. He currently employs 1.5 Million people. That's 1.5 million people that can eat, pay rent, buy a house, food, cars, pay taxes etc. Is it better for Jeff Bezos to run a profitable business selling things that people want to buy, where he enriches 1.5 Million other people, or do you think he'd be better in say Left-wing Cuba where his step-father fled from, to rely on the government to issue him a few peanuts a day to subsist on and where everyone else has no job and lives in abject poverty too?

                Which one of those do you thinks helps more people?

                • Autonomic on 01/03/2025 - 01:14

                  @1st-Amendment:

                  few peanuts a day to subsist on

                  Sounds like Amazon workers to me

                  • 1st-Amendment on 01/03/2025 - 13:49

                    @Autonomic:

                    Sounds like Amazon workers to me

                    Is that what you read on the Internet then instantly believed?

                    The average income for an Amazon Australia employee is $122k, in the US it's minimum $30/hour (AUD) in Cuba it is $2.8k/year

                    Tell me which one you prefer

            • ruanjiangongren on 28/02/2025 - 19:04
              +1

              @1st-Amendment: You would be right if USAID were funded by Elon Musk. However, USAID is funded by American tax payers who did not raise many concerns about helping poor foreign people in last 60 years. And they also donate ~$500 billions to charity every year. What Elon did is not refusing to spend his own money on helping others. Instead, he prevented those American tax payers who are willing to help others from doing so. This is disgusting.

              • 1st-Amendment on 28/02/2025 - 19:26

                @ruanjiangongren:

                USAID is funded by American tax payers who did not raise many concerns

                Well they did exactly that at the last election. Trump ran on this platform and voters voted for it. That is how democracy works.

                about helping poor foreign people in last 60 years.

                Well this is the problem, it wasn't really about helping the poor, it was about Left-wing ideological crusades as the DOGE docs show.

                Instead, he prevented those American tax payers who are willing to help others from doing so.

                Nothing is stopping anyone from donating to charity. I'm sure the Iraqis will miss Sesame street and Ireland will miss its DEI musicals that American taxpayer were funding, but you are free to set up a GoFundMe and help these people out if you choose, just don't expect taxpayers to be funding your special interest crusades in future.
                Why do the Left's great ideas always require $Other_People's_Money?

                This is disgusting.

                What's disgusting is the people who think greater transparency and accountability in government is a bad thing.

                • Autonomic on 01/03/2025 - 01:18

                  @1st-Amendment:

                  it was about Left-wing ideological crusades as the DOGE docs show.

                  Helping babies with HIV is something only the left would do

                  • 1st-Amendment on 01/03/2025 - 13:51

                    @Autonomic:

                    Helping babies with HIV is something only the left would do

                    How many are you helping right now?

                    • Autonomic on 02/03/2025 - 10:14

                      @1st-Amendment: What's the argument here? If every left voter isn't personally helping, no one should be? I donate to MSF every year.

                      • 1st-Amendment on 02/03/2025 - 12:04

                        @Autonomic:

                        What's the argument here?

                        I'll tell you what's it's not. Left = good, Right = evil. That is the cartoon level world view you tried to argue with 'Helping babies with HIV is something only the left would do'

                        So stop and just think about this for a moment. Using the subject of treating HIV, how do you treat HIV patients? You need effective medicine right? And who invented those? I'll give you a clue, the top 10 HIV treatments were all invented by private companies (Gilead, J&J, GSK, Merck). How do private companies flourish so they can keep inventing things that improve lives? When they're allowed to keep more of their own money to devote to the things they know how to do best.

                        Now apply that across the board to every invention that improved billions of lives over the last few centuries. It almost always private sector that creates the innovations that improves lives. So when you say 'Helping babies with HIV is something only the left would do', it's comical.

                        If every left voter isn't personally helping, no one should be?

                        A good analogy would be the give a man a fish and he eats for a day, teach a man to fish and he eats for a lifetime proverb. The Left always seem to think (just like you did just now) that giving fish is the only way to improve things.And that if that doesn't work then the government should take more people's money by force so they are able to give out more fish. This never works long term, and if anyone calls out this failed strategy, they are labelled as Racist/Fascist/Nazis. This is the comedy that is the modern Left

                        The Right wing view is less concerned about giving fish, or even teaching to fish, because these are not as good return on investment. It believes that if you allow people to have the ability to invent fishing rods, and boats, and nets then it won't just improve one life, it will improve millions or even billions. And that exactly what capitalism (Right wing) has done over the last few hundred years.

                        Here's a good graph showing how BILLIONS of lives have been improved not by charity, but by freeing up market economies: https://blog.bham.ac.uk/cityredi/wp-content/uploads/sites/15…

                        I donate to MSF every year

                        Cool, but if you bought Gilead shares, or invested in other private research firms you'd probably get more bang for your buck. This is how the the Right does far more good than the Left ever could. Don't waste your money by just giving out fish, empower other people to create new ways of fishing by allowing them to keep more of their own money to innovate and do the things they are best at doing. This is why USAID is being shutdown. It wasn't even giving out any fish, it was taking TENS OF BILLIONS of dollars of other people's money to fund ideological crusades (Iraqi Sesame Street, Irish DEI musicals, Egyptian tourism, Paris Fashion week etc). They were even funding the Wuhan lab that is alleged to have caused the Covid pandemic. So much for saving lives eh?

                        • Autonomic on 02/03/2025 - 19:39
                          +1

                          @1st-Amendment: I see. By not helping babies with HIV we're encouraging them to develop their own treatments which is, ultimately, a much better outcome.

                          • 1st-Amendment on 03/03/2025 - 12:37

                            @Autonomic:

                            I see.

                            Well you clearly don't see based on this response.

                            By not helping babies with HIV

                            Who do you think think invented all the HIV medicine?

                            Who do you think creates the environment where people are prosperous enough to donate to charities?

                            • Autonomic on 03/03/2025 - 14:31

                              @1st-Amendment:

                              Who do you think think invented all the HIV medicine?

                              Babies that suffered from HIV

                              Who do you think creates the environment where people are prosperous enough to donate to charities?

                              From the money saved by not helping the aforementioned babies

                              • 1st-Amendment on 03/03/2025 - 18:44

                                @Autonomic:

                                From the money saved

                                Taking other people's money then allowing them to keep some of it is not 'saving'. You can't get your head around the fact that it's not your money can you…

                                by not helping

                                So exactly like all the money you aren't sending then? If it weren't for double standards you wouldn't have any.

                                • Autonomic on 03/03/2025 - 19:33

                                  @1st-Amendment: Exactly. By not helping babies with HIV we are, in fact, helping them even more.

                                  • 1st-Amendment on 04/03/2025 - 14:02

                                    @Autonomic:

                                    By not helping babies with HIV we are, in fact, helping them even more

                                    Well we know it works, just look at how free market economies have much higher health outcomes than Communist ones.

                                    You can't get your head around the fact that it's not your money can you…

                                    And the kicker is that YOU are still free to help them if YOU choose. What is stopping you from doing that? Every minute you spend complaining about this is one more baby you could've helped but chose not to. So brave, so courageous….

                                    • Autonomic on 04/03/2025 - 14:04

                                      @1st-Amendment: Free market economics: the less HIV babies we save, the more HIV babies we save.

                                      Why should anyone help anyone, ever? It's just going to hurt them in the long run. Helping people, especially sick babies, is pure evil.

                                      • 1st-Amendment on 04/03/2025 - 15:17
                                        -1

                                        @Autonomic:

                                        Child logic: the less HIV babies we save, the more HIV babies we save.

                                        FTFY

                                        Why should anyone help anyone, ever?

                                        Why do you think it is that you currently don't live in a cave spending most of your waking hours hunting and foraging for food? Do you not appreciate the help you've already received? Do you just take that for granted?

                                        I'll give you a clue, it wasn't charity that lifted BILLIONS of humans of poverty. Here's the data if you're ready to question your world view: https://www.fraserinstitute.org/commentary/world-shifted-fre…

                                        Also the beauty of a free market, is that YOU are still free to give people fish if you choose. Yay Freedom! What you will be able to do less of now is take other people's money for your crazy ideas like DEI musicals in Ireland or Ukrainians attending Paris Fashion Week, and that money will continue to improve more lives than you can possibly imagine, just like it already has (see charts in link)

      • Juggernaut1984 on 28/02/2025 - 14:24
        +2

        Every single person working in the US government is unelected except for the president.
        Every federal judge is also unelected.

        US PRESIDENT has plenary power over the exec branch of the government . He actually is the executive branch according to article 2 of the constitution.

        Whether anyone likes it or not Trump has the power to do what he is doing.

        • 1st-Amendment on 28/02/2025 - 19:28

          Whether anyone likes it or not Trump has the power to do what he is doing.

          Ooh they definitely don't like it. I haven't seen Democrats this upset since the Republicans freed their slaves 🤣

      • nomadspartan on 28/02/2025 - 16:28

        He said that it was a mistake and he reversed the decision.

        • prodrome on 28/02/2025 - 18:10

          He lied about that as well.

    • howcan on 28/02/2025 - 07:42
      -3

      Not really, the majority of these repetitive Tesla/Musk comments in every deal are CCP fanatics. Half are lonely and depressed uni student drones starved for attention and have found a common subject which aligns with other hyper-emotional tards, the other half are straight out CCP agents and bots working under instruction from Xi to post propaganda across Western countries. These comment sections now resemble some ridiculous Wechat bot feed.

      • knackers on 28/02/2025 - 07:52
        +18

        I'm a 46 yr old defence design engineer, Musk is an idiot and the rise of fascism/right wing extremism is a major concern with ASIO and the top brass at the ADF. The emotionally charged uni students are correct, you're wrong.

        • howcan on 28/02/2025 - 08:02
          -5

          Oh yah, I forgot there's a pasty white nerd group that basically dedicate their lives to posting rants on social media about Dutton/Morrison/Trump. They also carry on like scared little kittens, always sharing how absolutely terrified they are about every little action made by any type of conservative government.

          And you wouldn't believe it, it's quite common to find photos of these said terrified little kittens wearing red Labor party shirts 😂

          • TightAl on 28/02/2025 - 17:01

            @howcan: So you're not a pasty white nerd who is posting anti ccp rants? lmao

        • 1st-Amendment on 28/02/2025 - 08:17
          -6

          Musk is an idiot and the rise of fascism/right wing extremism is a major concern with ASIO and the top brass at the ADF.

          Lol 'top brass'? Did you hear that in a movie and thought it sounded cool? Who specifically is this 'top brass'?

          The emotionally charged uni students are correct, you're wrong.

          I'm right, you're wrong. Exactly the type of zero-logic argument we expect from emotionally charged uni students…

        • chadleyshe on 28/02/2025 - 09:07

          and what about the rise of anti-Semitism?

        • Mixhael on 28/02/2025 - 15:53

          defence design engineer

          How ironic a military contractor has ethical concerns.

          The people who get paid to design the weapons and arms of tomorrows wars.

          • 1st-Amendment on 28/02/2025 - 17:51
            +1

            @Mixhael:

            How ironic a military contractor has ethical concerns.

            He's more than likely just a uni student playing pretend… If he worked in Defence he'd need clearance, and that strictly forbids you from misrepresenting your employer like this in online forums. He'd be sacked on the spot.

            • howcan on 28/02/2025 - 19:57

              @1st-Amendment: That's true. Who would be dumb enough to literally identify themselves as a defence employee/contractor with their position and age, then post public criticism of our largest defence ally with public claims on behalf of the top brass of his orgnisation! The CCP AI bot that generated that post doesn't understand how absurd it would be for anyone to do that.

              • 1st-Amendment on 01/03/2025 - 14:33
                -1

                @knackers:

                https://www.theguardian.com/australia-news/article/2024/jun/…

                So you're a uni student who reads the Guardian and buys into the garbage. Well done.

                Let's see if we can pick apart yet another media beat up:
                Headline: Exclusive: Documents reveal the ADF has conducted more than a dozen investigations into allegations about army and navy personnel since 2022

                So is a dozen high or low? The ADF is 85000 strong so in any population of that size there would always some amount of investigations but the article doesn't tell you. And the reason they don't tell you is because they deliberately obfuscating in order to push fear, and the Muppets buy into that.

                Maybe the rate of investigation is 100 so 16 would be very low. Or maybe is normal is zero so 16 is high. Don't you ever question why they deliberately don't tell you?

                nine are still “pending” while two are open

                So what was the results of the others? Again they deliberately don't tell you to maintain the narrative. It may have turned out to be nothing_to_see_here but then the Guardian wouldn't have had their scare piece. You really need to look at this stuff more closely before swallowing the lies and deliberate mistruths.

                The fact you posted this as your smoking gun only shows how truly weak your claim is. Nowhere in the article did it say right-wing which is also unusual since if it was we know the Guardian would have it on the front page. This glaring omission is makes a great case study of why MSM and their lies are slowly dying.

                  • 1st-Amendment on 02/03/2025 - 12:50

                    @knackers:

                    Our resident incel

                    When you run out an argument, fall back on Ad Homimen… Not a good start…

                    The article also mentions words/phrases that align with right wing ideologies

                    Let me help you about here since you seem to have bought into a lie. 'Right Wing' primarily means freedom of expression and free markets, what cartoon channel did you get your definition from?

                    The fact that you missed all that suggests to me that you're not a genuine actor.

                    Either that or I know what words mean.

                    Are you going to claim Sky News is MSM?.

                    Yes lol. What did you think it was?
                    The idea that My_news_channel_ good and their_news_channel_ bad means you've bought into the lie.

                    Huge banner

                    So not the article then, a different article…

                    ‘Islamic extremism’ and ‘right wing extremism’ now represents 40% ASIO case load.

                    So what's the split? Is it 99% Islamic and 1% right wing? This would be important if you are interested in accuracy wouldn't it? Because Islamic extremism is hardly 'right wing' now is it? You don't see too many Imam's calling for greater free speech laws or greater economic freedom…

                    and the decentralised nature of emerging extremist ideologies.

                    Sure and I'd agree with that, but 'extremism' affect all sides. Or did you think the BLM riots that killed at least 20 people were 'fiery but mostly peaceful' like CNN tried to tell us?
                    The part you've failed to support was that someone wanting a free market or free speech is somehow a terrorist.

                    • knackers on 02/03/2025 - 15:59
                      +2

                      @1st-Amendment: You made a bunch of obfuscations and childish non-arguments…

                      Right wing ideologies cover a whole gamut of ideas and movements, from fascism to fiscal conservatism. I'm pretty sure ASIO is not concerned with fiscal conservatives or free-market capitalists.

                      As for the break down between Islamic extremism and right wing extremism. If you bothered to read the article you would have seen a figure of 25% case load for right wing extremist groups/individuals.
                      Here is the official ASIO publication cited by the article. Entitled, "Inquiry into RIGHT WING extremist movements in Australia"
                      https://www.aph.gov.au/DocumentStore.ashx?id=8c709782-609e-4…

                      You heard genuine concerns from our country's chief spy and you're stuck on which carriage service he appeared on. People who run cover for extremist are very much part of the problem.

                      This is a public forum so I'm sure some of the words used in this thread were flagged. Good luck, I hope your backyard is clean.

                      And seriously, less time trolling and more time living your life. 83 comments in 48hrs is super sad.

                      • 1st-Amendment on 02/03/2025 - 18:09

                        @knackers:

                        You made a bunch of obfuscations and childish non-arguments…

                        Well you said it so it's true. Is that the adult way of making an argument in your mind?

                        I'm pretty sure ASIO is not concerned with fiscal conservatives or free-market capitalists.

                        Yet you tried to make that equivalence above.

                        from fascism

                        Could you define this word for me? I'm serious here, I know what it means I just want to make sure we're talking the same language because I've had this conversation many times and every other time the other person didn't know what the word meant that they were throwing around. So I just want to be sure you are not just another one of the 'everyone I disagree with is a Fascist/Nazi/Racist' types etc

                        You heard genuine concerns from our country's chief spy

                        Well I heard a talking head give his spin because like every other talking head in the media they're all playing a game. You'd have to be naive to not understand how that game works, especially if you work in Gov.

                        and you're stuck on which carriage service he appeared on.

                        You brought it up lol. Do you even read what you write?

                        83 comments in 48hrs is super sad.

                        Not as sad as counting someone else post count as if that somehow adds weight to an argument. That is really creepy.

                        I'll also note you never attempted to answer any of my questions from the previous post. Obfuscation indeed…

      • May4th on 28/02/2025 - 07:54
        +1

        cool story, where do I collect my pay from CCP?

        • howcan on 28/02/2025 - 08:05

          Seems like you're happy to collect your endorphin rush every time you hit that post button because your exclusively online friends will think you're cool.

          • May4th on 28/02/2025 - 08:27

            @howcan: ok. it's probably time for you to do the dishes before mum cuts your wifi to the basement

            • howcan on 28/02/2025 - 19:48

              @May4th: Wait, what? Why are you conversing with anonymous people on the internet like they're a 12 year old child? You think it's cool but it's highly concerning behaviour and a massive red flag.

      • Purp on 28/02/2025 - 08:01
        +3

        They aren't bots, the are the perpetually online left activists.

      • dealhunter52 on 28/02/2025 - 11:23
        -1

        Musk is owned by CCP. He pokes his nose in politics all around the world but I have never seen him utter a word against Xi or CCP.

      • jackspratt on 28/02/2025 - 12:10

        Thank you for contributing even more. 👍

        • howcan on 28/02/2025 - 19:45

          Oh hey again friend. Fancy seeing you trawling through a Elon Musk related post trying to be cool! Because we all know you lead a completely fulfilling and eventful life when you're not crying about the contributions of anonymous people on the internet onto a bargain website that you don't have any type of investment in, yet seem to go on the offensive for. I'm not gonna lie, it's creepy as all hell, but kind of hilarious how sad it is.

    • 1st-Amendment on 28/02/2025 - 08:10

      It's a strange world when people in Australia consider China to be more virtuous than Elon Musk

      The Left were never known for logic and reason, it's always emotion with them. Just read all the comments in here as shining proof.

    • Autonomic on 28/02/2025 - 08:55
      +1

      not to mention militarily threatening their neighbors constantly.

      Like Taiwan?

      Elon Musk: I think Taiwan is an integral part of China

      • TightAl on 28/02/2025 - 17:02
        -1

        Taiwan belongs to China
        Just like Tasmania belongs to Australia

        • Juggernaut1984 on 28/02/2025 - 18:28
          +1

          That is true and the actual government for all of China is the Taiwan 🇹🇼 government!

          • TightAl on 28/02/2025 - 21:58

            @Juggernaut1984: They can barely govern a small island lmao, in your sweet dreams.

            • Juggernaut1984 on 28/02/2025 - 22:09
              +1

              @TightAl: Taiwan is very successful and freedom for the people with human rights. Don't worry about it they will do a great job and you will be happy 😊

              • TightAl on 01/03/2025 - 09:45

                @Juggernaut1984: So successful so much freedom Haha
                You obviously haven't been there, keep reading wikipedia!

    • TightAl on 28/02/2025 - 16:59

      Lmao believing "internment" camps, "slave labour" camps.
      Actually hilarious, here's the self declared expert.

      What 'threatening', like did they go bomb countries? how about invade a bunch of countries and destablise half the world?

      • belongsinforums on 01/03/2025 - 10:30
        +1

        The Uighur prison camps are well documented at this stage FYI

        • TightAl on 01/03/2025 - 10:30

          Yes sure they are, where are they?
          How many people are there?

  • OfferScooperHQ on 28/02/2025 - 07:28

    we do not buy microwaves 😅

  • Wiadro on 28/02/2025 - 07:30

    I’d rather spend 1/5 of that and buy a old bmw

    • easternculture on 28/02/2025 - 07:37
      +5

      Spoken like a true westpac employee apprentice

      • krisspy on 28/02/2025 - 09:44
        +2

        Graduate investment banker with a 4.0 GPA, high yield investments

    • Aureus on 28/02/2025 - 07:44
      +4

      Really good choice for anyone who enjoys automotive repair. 👍

    • shabaka on 28/02/2025 - 08:19
      +2

      spend twice that and get a new BMW

      • MrThing on 28/02/2025 - 09:19
        +1

        spend four times that when its out of warranty

        • shabaka on 28/02/2025 - 09:22
          +1

          no no you don't do that. trade that in before it's out of warranty. get a new BMW. rinse and repeat.

      • Caped Baldy on 28/02/2025 - 13:57

        Getting an old BMW is spending twice a new BMW

    • Znorka on 28/02/2025 - 08:50

      You are very cool and old school.

  • monty168 on 28/02/2025 - 07:51
    +3

    Tempting, great car for that price

    • tempting on 28/02/2025 - 08:51
      +1

      I agree

  • wfdTamar on 28/02/2025 - 07:52
    +5

    I liked this when I test drove it a few months ago. Possibly would have bought one, but waited to see what the Juniper version would be like. It didn't feel as big as its size (I didn't really want a car that big).

    I like the Tesla service model, but have read horror stories of post warranty repair costs (I would have kept it long term). The warranty is a bit measly compared to a lot of others.

    I love the tech in them, but not the insistence on using the display for virtually everything.

    A big factor was that they seem to be the poster child for anti EV nuts and therefore vandalism and road rage. Yes you have the cameras, but I'd rather not get the damage in the first place.

    Now, given what a fascist nut job Musk is, there's no way I would contribute to his cause. The sales reps keep calling me and I can hear the desperation.

    As a temporary (some years) I bought a lightly used Hyundai Ioniq 38 for $26k. Suits my needs (I don't need long range or uber 0-100) and has a lot of mod cons.

    • garage sale on 28/02/2025 - 08:36
      +1

      i’d love an EV as i live inner city and only drive 300 kms per week , still a bit pricey my budget even used, but hopefully more used will come to the market.

      • wfdTamar on 28/02/2025 - 08:55

        Sometimes see the base model Ioniq under $20k. Well worth testing one.

  • May4th on 28/02/2025 - 07:56

    not wading in on the politics but the old MY RWD is notorious for a poor ride and stiff suspension - if you are going for the old model, get a long range or performance, or wait for the cheaper new 25 MY if you are a muskhead and launch series is out of budget

    • 1st-Amendment on 28/02/2025 - 08:24
      +3

      not wading in on the politics

      There no politics in this thread, it's just a bunch of babies whining about the whoever the media told them to hate this week. After 8 years of Orange Man Bad not working, they though they'd try Elon Man Bad to see if that would work. Because you know what they say about repeating the same failed strategy over and over and expecting a different result…

      • May4th on 28/02/2025 - 08:30
        +8

        you know I miss the days when we were arguing about actual deals and products instead of all this bs

      • prodrome on 28/02/2025 - 08:54
        +1

        username checks out

Login or Join to leave a comment
Login Join